Development of an Upper Limb Robotic Device for Stroke Rehabilitation

Stroke is the major cause of permanent adult disability worldwide. Often stroke affects the motor control of the upper limb, leading to difficulties in performing activities of daily living. Many hours are spent in resource-intensive therapy to regain functionality of the upper limb. In order to decrease the burden to therapists and increase access to rehabilitation, an upper limb rehabilitation robotic device was developed. Observations from therapists and an international survey of stroke therapists were conducted to understand general requirements of an upper limb rehabilitation device. These requirements were the basis of the mechanical design portion of the prototype. The prototype was evaluated with stroke therapists in a focus group. Although more iterations of design, testing and evaluation are needed, this project is a step in developing a lower cost, portable device to increase access to upper limb stroke rehabilitation.

[1]  R. Richardson,et al.  Enhancing exploratory learning behaviour in people with stroke undertaking iPAM robot assisted upper limb exercises , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[2]  W. Rymer,et al.  Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[3]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Upper Limb Robotic Therapy for Children with Hemiplegia , 2008, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[4]  C. E. Clauser,et al.  Weight, volume, and center of mass of segments of the human body , 1969 .

[5]  Maureen K. Holden,et al.  Virtual Environments for Motor Rehabilitation: Review , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[6]  Sheila Lennon,et al.  Physiotherapy practice in stroke rehabilitation: a survey , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[7]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  P. Morasso,et al.  Braccio di Ferro: a new haptic workstation for neuromotor rehabilitation. , 2006, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[9]  Claire C. Gordon,et al.  A Supplement to the 1995 Matched Anthropometric Database of U.S. Marine Corps Personnel: Summary Statistics , 1996 .

[10]  Mark Bayley,et al.  Canadian best practice recommendations for stroke care (updated 2008) , 2008, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[11]  M. Franceschini,et al.  Robot therapy for functional recovery of the upper limbs: a pilot study on patients after stroke. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[12]  C. Ogden,et al.  Anthropometric reference data for children and adults: United States, 2007-2010. , 2012, Vital and health statistics. Series 11, Data from the National Health Survey.

[13]  Derek G Kamper,et al.  Effect of a gravity-compensating orthosis on reaching after stroke: evaluation of the Therapy Assistant WREX. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  David Howard,et al.  Movement variability in stroke patients and controls performing two upper limb functional tasks: a new assessment methodology , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[15]  Hermano I Krebs,et al.  Rehabilitation robotics: pilot trial of a spatial extension for MIT-Manus , 2004, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[16]  L. Nilsson,et al.  Physical Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation: Bases for Swedish Physiotherapists' Choice of Treatment , 1992 .

[17]  Fernando Quevedo Ricardi The chi-square , 2011 .

[18]  N. Hogan,et al.  Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  Mark J. Wierman,et al.  RANKING ORDINAL SCALES USING THE CONSENSUS MEASURE , 2005 .

[20]  S. Masiero,et al.  Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[21]  J. Mehrholz,et al.  Computerized Arm Training Improves the Motor Control of the Severely Affected Arm After Stroke: A Single-Blinded Randomized Trial in Two Centers , 2005, Stroke.

[22]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Cortical Plasticity Following Motor Skill Learning During Mental Practice in Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[23]  W. Rymer,et al.  Robotic Devices for Movement Therapy After Stroke: Current Status and Challenges to Clinical Acceptance , 2002, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[24]  Christina Wasson Ethnography in the Field of Design , 2000 .

[25]  H. Ring,et al.  Robot-assisted therapy for neuromuscular training of sub-acute stroke patients. A feasibility study. , 2008, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[26]  B. Brewer,et al.  Poststroke Upper Extremity Rehabilitation: A Review of Robotic Systems and Clinical Results , 2007, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[27]  B Kolb,et al.  Experience-Associated Structural Events, Subependymal Cellular Proliferative Activity, and Functional Recovery After Injury to the Central Nervous System , 2000, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[28]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[29]  R. Schiffer,et al.  INTRODUCTION , 1988, Neurology.

[30]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[31]  T. Murphy,et al.  Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  Alex Mihailidis,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A REHABILITATION ROBOTIC DEVICE : NATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN THERAPIST PRACTICE , 2011 .

[33]  L Dipietro,et al.  Changing motor synergies in chronic stroke. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  K. An,et al.  Functional ranges of motion of the wrist joint. , 1991, The Journal of hand surgery.

[35]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[36]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robotic Technology and Stroke Rehabilitation: Translating Research into Practice , 2004, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[37]  W. Rymer,et al.  Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[38]  A. Eagger Rehabilitation , 1960 .

[39]  L. Sherwood Human Physiology : From Cells to Systems , 1989 .

[40]  W. Rymer,et al.  Guidance-based quantification of arm impairment following brain injury: a pilot study. , 1999, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[41]  Hans Forssberg,et al.  Use-Dependent Up- and Down-Regulation of Sensorimotor Brain Circuits in Stroke Patients , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[42]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[43]  Robert Riener,et al.  ARMin: a robot for patient-cooperative arm therapy , 2007, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[44]  Daniel Vélez Día,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 2013 .

[45]  R. Richardson,et al.  Initial patient testing of iPAM - a robotic system for Stroke rehabilitation , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[46]  Steven L. Wolf,et al.  Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Results in Increased Motor Map Area in Subjects 3 to 9 Months After Stroke , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[47]  Thomas J. Dormody,et al.  Analyzing Data Measured by Individual Likert-Type Items. , 1994 .

[48]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Arm-Training with T-WREX After Chronic Stroke: Preliminary Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[49]  N. Hogan,et al.  Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscular stimulation following stroke. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[50]  C. Mathers,et al.  Preventing stroke: saving lives around the world , 2007, The Lancet Neurology.

[51]  P. Goldfarb Physical therapy. , 1997, The Journal of the Kentucky Medical Association.

[52]  Michael Hillman Introduction to the special issue on rehabilitation robotics , 1998, Robotica.

[53]  ARMassist: A low-cost device for telerehabiltation of post-stroke arm deficits , 2009 .

[54]  Rory A. Cooper,et al.  Rehabilitation Engineering Applied to Mobility and Manipulation , 1995 .

[55]  C. Burgar,et al.  MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: A follow-up study. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[56]  Garth R Johnson,et al.  A study of the external forces and moments at the shoulder and elbow while performing every day tasks. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[57]  R. Riener,et al.  Effects of intensive arm training with the rehabilitation robot ARMin II in chronic stroke patients: four single-cases , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[58]  W. Harwin,et al.  The effect of the GENTLE/s robot-mediated therapy system on arm function after stroke , 2008, Clinical rehabilitation.

[59]  H. Kundel,et al.  Measurement of observer agreement. , 2003, Radiology.

[60]  H. F. Machiel van der Loos,et al.  Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[61]  Ming-Lu Wu,et al.  Quality function deployment: A literature review , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[62]  Gabor Fazekas,et al.  A novel robot training system designed to supplement upper limb physiotherapy of patients with spastic hemiparesis , 2006, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[63]  William Harwin,et al.  Devices for assisting manipulation: a summary of user task priorities , 1994 .

[64]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: Follow-up results. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[65]  Hermano I Krebs,et al.  Multicenter Randomized Trial of Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke: Methods and Entry Characteristics for VA ROBOTICS , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[66]  Susan Carlson Skalak House of Quality , 2002 .

[67]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Intensive Sensorimotor Arm Training Mediated by Therapist or Robot Improves Hemiparesis in Patients With Chronic Stroke , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[68]  S. Hesse,et al.  Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[69]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of Reliability , 1973 .

[70]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke , 2003, Neurology.

[71]  I. Robertson,et al.  Rehabilitation of brain damage: brain plasticity and principles of guided recovery. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[72]  James E. Bartlett,et al.  Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research , 2001 .

[73]  Henning Schmidt,et al.  Machines to support motor rehabilitation after stroke: 10 years of experience in Berlin. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[74]  D. Corbett,et al.  Efficacy of Rehabilitative Experience Declines with Time after Focal Ischemic Brain Injury , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[75]  H. Krebs,et al.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[76]  Alejandro A. Rabinstein Principles of Cerebrovascular Disease , 2007 .

[77]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Faster, cheaper, deeper user research , 2010 .

[78]  Hussein A. Abdullah,et al.  Design Issues for Therapeutic Robot Systems: Results from a Survey of Physiotherapists , 2005, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[79]  Jason Viereck Principles of Cerebrovascular Disease , 2006 .

[80]  Maura Casadio,et al.  A proof of concept study for the integration of robot therapy with physiotherapy in the treatment of stroke patients , 2009, Clinical rehabilitation.

[81]  William S. Harwin,et al.  Upper Limb Robot Mediated Stroke Therapy—GENTLE/s Approach , 2003, Auton. Robots.

[82]  Jan Gulliksen,et al.  Key principles for user-centred systems design , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[83]  Susan D Horn,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation patients, practice, and outcomes: is earlier and more aggressive therapy better? , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[84]  P. Stratford,et al.  Measuring Physical Impairment and Disability With the Chedoke‐McMaster Stroke Assessment , 1993, Stroke.

[85]  Ruth Bonita,et al.  The worldwide burden of stroke: current status and future projections. , 2009, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[86]  Pradeep Natarajan,et al.  Expert system-based post-stroke robotic rehabilitation for hemiparetic arm , 2007 .

[87]  K. Sunnerhagen,et al.  Kinematic Variables Quantifying Upper-Extremity Performance After Stroke During Reaching and Drinking From a Glass , 2011, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[88]  G. Robert Whitcomb,et al.  Computer games for the elderly , 1990, CQL.

[89]  Nick S. Ward,et al.  The functional anatomy of cerebral reorganisation after focal brain injury , 2006, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[90]  S. Carmichael,et al.  Plasticity of Cortical Projections after Stroke , 2003, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[91]  D. Lynch,et al.  A pilot study of activity-based therapy in the arm motor recovery post stroke: a randomized controlled trial , 2008, Clinical rehabilitation.

[92]  Andras Toth,et al.  Safe robot therapy: Adaptation and usability test of a three-position enabling device for use in robot mediated physical therapy of stroke , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[93]  Jaap Harlaar,et al.  The globe system: an unambiguous description of shoulder positions in daily life movements. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[94]  Sarah J. Housman,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of Gravity-Supported, Computer-Enhanced Arm Exercise for Individuals With Severe Hemiparesis , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[95]  H. Ellis stroke , 1997, The Lancet.

[96]  Alex Mihailidis,et al.  A haptic-robotic platform for upper-limb reaching stroke therapy: Preliminary design and evaluation results , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[97]  F. Lowry,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation services inadequate, experts say , 2010, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[98]  M. Levesley,et al.  Systematic review of outcome measures used in the evaluation of robot-assisted upper limb exercise in stroke. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[99]  P. Pohl,et al.  Current clinical practices in stroke rehabilitation: regional pilot survey. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[100]  I. Davidson,et al.  Physiotherapists Working with Stroke Patients , 2000 .

[101]  Grant D. Huang,et al.  Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[102]  Douglas Schuler,et al.  Participatory Design: Principles and Practices , 1993 .

[103]  H. Krebs,et al.  Mechanical Arm Trainer for the Treatment of the Severely Affected Arm After a Stroke: A Single-Blinded Randomized Trial in Two Centers , 2008, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[104]  Nadina B. Lincoln,et al.  Physiotherapy treatment for stroke patients: A survey of current practice , 1996 .

[105]  Catherine M. Dean,et al.  Physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation : bases for Australian physiotherapists' choice of treatment , 1994 .

[106]  Alex Mihailidis,et al.  The development of an upper limb stroke rehabilitation robot: identification of clinical practices and design requirements through a survey of therapists , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.