Patterns and expenditures of multi-morbidity in an insured working population in the United States: insights for a sustainable health care system and building healthier lives.

The U.S. health care system is currently heading toward unsustainable health care expenditures and increased dissatisfaction with health outcomes. The objective of this population-based study is to uncover practical insights regarding patients with 1 or more chronic illnesses. A cross-sectional investigation was designed to gather data from health records drawn from diverse US geographic markets. A database of 9.74 million fully-insured, working individuals was used, together with members in the same households. Among nearly 3.43 million patients with claims, 2.22 million had chronic conditions. About 24.3% had 1 chronic condition and 40.4% had multi-morbidity. Health care expenditures for chronic conditions accounted for 92% of all costs (52% for chronic costs and 40% for nonchronic costs). Psychiatry, orthopedics-rheumatology, endocrinology, and cardiology areas accounted for two thirds of these chronic condition costs; nonchronic condition costs were dominated by otolaryngology, gastroenterology, dermatology, orthopedics-rheumatology conditions, and preventive services. About 50.1% of all households had 2 or more members with chronic conditions. In summary, multi-morbidity is prevalent not only among those older than age 65 years but also in younger and working individuals, and commonly occurs among several members of a household. The authors suggest that the disease-focused model of medicine should change to a more holistic illness-wellness model, emphasizing not only the physical but also the mental and social elements that can influence individual health. In that way the chronic care model could be broadened in context and content to improve the health of patients and households.

[1]  Marianna Diomidous,et al.  Social Networks and Health , 2015, ICIMTH.

[2]  R. Gevirtz,et al.  Stress in medicine: Strategies for caregivers, patients, clinicians , 2011, Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine.

[3]  Richard A. Goodman,et al.  Managing Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Strategic Framework for Improving Health Outcomes and Quality of Life , 2011, Public health reports.

[4]  Elizabeth K Rasch,et al.  The Complex Web of Health: Relationships among Chronic Conditions, Disability, and Health Services , 2011, Public health reports.

[5]  L. Glynn,et al.  Joined-up thinking in reduction of cardiovascular risk , 2011, The Lancet.

[6]  Martin Fortin,et al.  Future of Multimorbidity Research: How Should Understanding of Multimorbidity Inform Health System Design? , 2010 .

[7]  M. Dawes Co-morbidity: we need a guideline for each patient not a guideline for each disease. , 2010, Family practice.

[8]  L. Glynn Multimorbidity: another key issue for cardiovascular medicine , 2009, The Lancet.

[9]  Nancy A Perrin,et al.  Collaborative care for chronic pain in primary care: a cluster randomized trial. , 2009, JAMA.

[10]  L. Dumitrescu,et al.  THE BUSINESS VALUE , 2008 .

[11]  S. Jencks,et al.  Using Population Segmentation to Provide Better Health Care for All: The 'Bridges to Health' Model , 2007, The Milbank quarterly.

[12]  Jeanne Daly,et al.  A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[13]  Derick T Wade,et al.  Do biomedical models of illness make for good healthcare systems? , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  E H Wagner,et al.  Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness? , 1998, Effective clinical practice : ECP.