Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 87411 × 59122 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2017‐139)

Abstract Maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 87411 × 59122 (six‐event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine six single events: MON 87427, MON 87460, MON 89034, 1507, MON 87411 and 59122. The GMO Panel previously assessed the six single maize events and 17 of the subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events or the 17 subcombinations were identified that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins and dsRNA in the six‐event stack maize does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the six‐event stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as its non‐GM comparator and the selected non‐GM reference varieties. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of the six‐event stack maize into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in the 39 maize subcombinations not previously assessed and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the six–event stack maize. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the six‐event stack maize. Post‐market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the six‐event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as the non‐GM comparator and the selected non‐GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

[1]  Y. Vigouroux,et al.  Adaptive introgression from maize has facilitated the establishment of teosinte as a noxious weed in Europe , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  R. Binimelis,et al.  Teosinte in Europe – Searching for the Origin of a Novel Weed , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[3]  K. Pascher Spread of volunteer and feral maize plants in Central Europe: recent data from Austria , 2016, Environmental Sciences Europe.

[4]  S. Tanumihardjo,et al.  Effects of Different Processing Methods on the Micronutrient and Phytochemical Contents of Maize: From A to Z. , 2016, Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety.

[5]  J. Ward,et al.  The food and environmental safety of Bt crops , 2015, Front. Plant Sci..

[6]  Guoyao Wu Dietary requirements of synthesizable amino acids by animals: a paradigm shift in protein nutrition , 2014, Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology.

[7]  Nand K. Singh,et al.  Reduction of phytic acid and enhancement of bioavailable micronutrients in food grains , 2015, Journal of Food Science and Technology.

[8]  B. Tinland,et al.  General Surveillance for Import and Processing: the EuropaBio approach , 2009, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[9]  Enric Melé,et al.  Effect of volunteers on maize gene flow , 2009, Transgenic Research.

[10]  Christopher P. Bonin,et al.  ’ s Choice Series on the Next Generation of Biotech Crops Bacterial RNA Chaperones Confer Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants and Improved Grain Yield in Maize under Water-Limited Conditions [ W ] , 2008 .

[11]  Nathalie Colbach,et al.  Post-harvest gene escape and approaches for minimizing it , 2008 .

[12]  B. Tinland,et al.  General Surveillance: Roles and Responsibilities The Industry View , 2007, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[13]  Geert Plaetinck,et al.  Control of coleopteran insect pests through RNA interference , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  M. Inouye,et al.  Three Amino Acids in Escherichia coli CspE Surface-exposed Aromatic Patch Are Critical for Nucleic Acid Melting Activity Leading to Transcription Antitermination and Cold Acclimation of Cells* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  M. Inouye,et al.  The Nucleic Acid Melting Activity of Escherichia coliCspE Is Critical for Transcription Antitermination and Cold Acclimation of Cells* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  K. Narva,et al.  Novel Bacillus thuringiensis Binary Insecticidal Crystal Proteins Active on Western Corn Rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[17]  Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): The significance of gene flow through pollen transfer , 2002 .

[18]  N. Crickmore,et al.  Bacillus thuringiensis and Its Pesticidal Crystal Proteins , 1998, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[19]  K. Herrmann The Shikimate Pathway: Early Steps in the Biosynthesis of Aromatic Compounds. , 1995, The Plant cell.

[20]  A. Puhler,et al.  The Metabolites of the Herbicide L-Phosphinothricin (Glufosinate) (Identification, Stability, and Mobility in Transgenic, Herbicide-Resistant, and Untransformed Plants) , 1994, Plant physiology.

[21]  A. Pühler,et al.  Nucleotide sequence of the phosphinothricin N-acetyltransferase gene from Streptomyces viridochromogenes Tü494 and its expression in Nicotiana tabacum. , 1988, Gene.

[22]  C. Thompson,et al.  Characterization of the herbicide‐resistance gene bar from Streptomyces hygroscopicus , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[23]  P. Sanders,et al.  Expression of bacterial genes in plant cells. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.