The case of the vanishing frequency effect: A retest of the verification model.

[1]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[2]  G. M. Reicher.  Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  E. Goldstein.  Sensation and perception, 3rd ed. , 1989 .

[4]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[5]  J. Moran,et al.  Sensation and perception , 1980 .

[6]  R. Solomon,et al.  Frequency of usage as a determinant of recognition thresholds for words. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  R. Venezky,et al.  Orthographic structure and spelling-sound regularity in reading English words. , 1987 .

[8]  G. E. MacKinnon,et al.  Reading Research Advances in Theory and Practice , 1985 .

[9]  H. Savin.  Word‐Frequency Effect and Errors in the Perception of Speech , 1963 .

[10]  A. Jacobs,et al.  On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[12]  William Epstein,et al.  Perceptual set as an artifact of recency. , 1960 .

[13]  David A. Balota.  Comprehension Processes in Reading. , 1990 .

[14]  W. F. Hawkins,et al.  Vexierversuch: the log relationship between word-frequency and recognition obtained in the absence of stimulus words. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Tables of single-letter and digram frequency counts for various word-length and letter-position combinations. , 1965 .

[16]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[17]  C. A. Becker.  Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[18]  R. Solomon,et al.  Visual duration threshold as a function of word-probability. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  Allen R. Dobbs,et al.  Frequency Effects in Lexical Decisions: A Test of the Verification Model , 1985 .

[20]  Roger W. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Semantic Context and the Encoding of Words: Evidence for Two Modes of Stimulus Analysis. , 1981 .

[21]  Allen and Rosenbloom Paul S. Newell,et al.  Mechanisms of Skill Acquisition and the Law of Practice , 1993 .

[22]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time-course and decision criteria , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[23]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Experimental tests of a hierarchical model of word identification , 1980 .

[24]  K R Paap,et al.  A perceptual-confusion account of the WSE in the target search paradigm , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[26]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[27]  C. A. Becker.  Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  D. Balota,et al.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  A dual read-out model of word context effects in letter perception: Further investigations of the word superiority effect. , 1994 .

[30]  K. Rayner,et al.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  Thomas H. Killion,et al.  Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. , 1977 .

[32]  R. Haber,et al.  The psychology of visual perception , 1973 .

[33]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? , 1992 .

[34]  P. Allen,et al.  Perhaps the lexicon is coded as a function of word frequency. , 1992 .

[35]  J G Snodgrass,et al.  Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition: Facilitatory or inhibitory? , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[36]  D W Massaro,et al.  Visual, orthographic, phonological, and lexical influences in reading. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  S. Andrews.  Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? , 1989 .

[38]  Ram Frost,et al.  Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning , 1992 .

[39]  C. A. Becker.  Allocation of attention during visual word recognition. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  B. J. Davidson,et al.  Regression analyses as a tool for studying reading processes: Comment on Just and Carpenters eye fixation theory , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[41]  A. Marcel.  Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  J. Grainger.  Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. , 1990 .

[43]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  A non-parametric analysis of recognition experiments , 1964 .

[44]  D W Massaro,et al.  Letter information and orthographic context in word perception. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Basic processes in reading : visual word recognition , 1993 .

[46]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[47]  Newbigging Pl.  The perceptual redintegration of frequent and infrequent words. , 1961 .

[48]  L. Manelis.  Frequency and Meaningfulness in Tachistoscopic Word Perception , 1977 .

[49]  R W Schvaneveldt,et al.  An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect. , 1982, Psychological review.