Customer Strategies for Responding to Day-Ahead Market HourlyElectricity Pricing

Real-time pricing (RTP) has been advocated as an economically efficient means to send price signals to customers to promote demand response (DR) (Borenstein 2002, Borenstein 2005, Ruff 2002). However, limited information exists that can be used to judge how effectively RTP actually induces DR, particularly in the context of restructured electricity markets. This report describes the second phase of a study of how large, non-residential customers' adapted to default-service day-ahead hourly pricing. The customers are located in upstate New York and served under Niagara Mohawk, A National Grid Company (NMPC)'s SC-3A rate class. The SC-3A tariff is a type of RTP that provides firm, day-ahead notice of hourly varying prices indexed to New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) day-ahead market prices. The study was funded by the California Energy Commission (CEC)'s PIER program through the Demand Response Research Center (DRRC). NMPC's is the first and longest-running default-service RTP tariff implemented in the context of retail competition. The mix of NMPC's large customers exposed to day-ahead hourly prices is roughly 30% industrial, 25% commercial and 45% institutional. They have faced periods of high prices during the study period (2000-2004), thereby providing an opportunity to assess their response to volatile hourly prices.more » The nature of the SC-3A default service attracted competitive retailers offering a wide array of pricing and hedging options, and customers could also participate in demand response programs implemented by NYISO. The first phase of this study examined SC-3A customers' satisfaction, hedging choices and price response through in-depth customer market research and a Constant Elasticity of Substitution (CES) demand model (Goldman et al. 2004). This second phase was undertaken to answer questions that remained unresolved and to quantify price response to a higher level of granularity. We accomplished these objectives with a second customer survey and interview effort, which resulted in a higher, 76% response rate, and the adoption of the more flexible Generalized Leontief (GL) demand model, which allows us to analyze customer response under a range of conditions (e.g. at different nominal prices) and to determine the distribution of individual customers' response.« less

[1]  Douglas W. Caves,et al.  The Neoclassical Model of Consumer Demand with Identically Priced Commodities: An Application to Time-of-Use Electricity Pricing , 1987 .

[2]  Thomas N. Taylor,et al.  The Long-Run Effects of a Time-of-Use Demand Charge , 1990 .

[3]  Robert H. Patrick,et al.  Rate structure effects and regression parameter instability across time-of-use electricity pricing experiments , 1990 .

[4]  B. Neenan,et al.  Social Welfare implications of demand response programs in competitive electricity markets , 2003 .

[5]  G. Barbose,et al.  How and why customers respond to electricity price variability: A study of NYISO and NYSERDA 2002 PRL program performance , 2003 .

[6]  Galen Barbose,et al.  Real Time Pricing as a Default or Optional Service for C&ICustomers: A Comparative Analysis of Eight Case Studies , 2005 .

[7]  F. Wolak,et al.  Estimating the Customer-Level Demand for Electricity Under Real-Time Market Prices , 2001 .

[8]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  Global Properties of Flexible Functional Forms , 1980 .

[9]  A. Goldberger.  A course in econometrics , 1991 .

[10]  J. R. Moroney,et al.  The Structure of Production in American Manufacturing , 1972 .

[11]  Iu. Kochevrin.  The Neoclassical Theory of Production and Distribution , 1988 .

[12]  Dean C. Mountain,et al.  Time-of-Use Prices and Electricity Demand: Allowing for Selection Bias in Experimental Data , 1997 .

[13]  Jay Zarnikau,et al.  Customer Responsiveness to Real-Time Pricing of Electricity , 1990 .

[14]  S. Braithwait.  Residential TOU Price Response in the Presence of Interactive Communication Equipment , 2000 .

[15]  R. Boisvert.  The Translog Production Function: Its Properties, Its Several Interpretations and Estimation Problems , 1982 .

[16]  Douglas W. Caves,et al.  The Response of Industrial Customers to Electric Rates Based Upon Dynamic Marginal Costs , 1993 .

[17]  P. Cappers,et al.  Customer response to day-ahead wholesale market electricity prices: Case study of RTP program experience in New York , 2004 .

[18]  Douglas W. Caves,et al.  Consistency of residential customer response in time-of-use electricity pricing experiments , 1984 .

[19]  W. E.,et al.  Mathematical Analysis for Economists , 1938, Nature.

[20]  Ernst R. Berndt,et al.  The Practice of Econometrics: Classic and Contemporary. , 1992 .

[21]  W. Diewert.  Applications of Duality Theory , 1974 .

[22]  Thomas N. Taylor,et al.  24/7 Hourly Response to Electricity Real-Time Pricing with up to Eight Summers of Experience , 2005 .

[23]  R. Shepherd.  Theory of cost and production functions , 1970 .

[24]  Thomas N. Taylor,et al.  Advance notice of real-time electricity prices , 2000 .

[25]  D. W. Caves,et al.  Residential Substitution of Off-peak for Peak Electricity Usage under Time-of-Use Pricing , 1980 .

[26]  Shana L. Dardan,et al.  INDUSTRIAL RESPONSE TO ELECTRICITY REAL‐TIME PRICES: SHORT RUN AND LONG RUN , 2002 .

[27]  N. Whittlesey,et al.  The Constant Elasticity of Substitution Production Function and Its Application in Research , 1975 .

[28]  Jean-Paul Chavas,et al.  Applied Production Analysis: A Dual Approach , 1988 .

[29]  P. Cappers,et al.  Industrial and Commercial Customer Response To Real Time Electricity Prices , 2004 .