Delegate MASs for coordination and control of one-directional AGV systems: a proof-of-concept

Decentralized coordination and route planning face the challenges such as scalability, dynamic changes (disturbances) in the environment, continuous planning, and coordination issues (i.e., deadlock and livelock situations). Self-organized delegate multi-agent systems (D-MASs) have proven to be effective decentralized coordination mechanisms for coordination and control (C&C) applications. However, the use of such coordination mechanisms becomes more challenging, compared to the previous studies, in which the coordinated entities are one-directional automated guided vehicles (AGVs), with restricted movement, situated in a highly dynamic production environment. To address these challenges, there were several problematic situations identified dealing with issues such as the originally proposed functionalities of D-MASs, restricted movement, priority parameter settings, and simulated failures of AGVs. Solutions (coordination rules) to these situations were proposed, also described examples were provided and, finally, the approach was verified by simulation in the 3D environment, involving five AGV agents (AGVAs). Simple indicators of such intralogistics system were proposed to outline the system performance. Simulations were performed with as well as without simulated failure states. Simulation results show that the proof-of-concept was reached, and that by the combination of the proposed coordination rules and D-MAS, one-directional AGVAs were able to generate a short-term forecast for the near future and thus anticipate and avoid coordination issues as well as to cope with simulated failures.

[1]  Paul Valckenaers,et al.  Holonic Manufacturing Execution Systems , 2005 .

[2]  Sanjay E. Sarma,et al.  Auto ID systems and intelligent manufacturing control , 2003 .

[3]  Michael E. Bratman,et al.  Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason , 1991 .

[4]  Adriano Fagiolini,et al.  Distributed Collision-free Protocol for AGVs in Industrial Environments , 2011, ArXiv.

[5]  Reza Zanjirani Farahani,et al.  An ant colony-based algorithm for finding the shortest bidirectional path for automated guided vehicles in a block layout , 2012, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[6]  M. H. Fazel Zarandi,et al.  Coordination of order and production policy in buyer–vendor chain using PROSA Holonic architecture , 2009 .

[7]  Kenwood H. Hall,et al.  Rockwell Automation's Holonic and Multiagent Control Systems Compendium , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[8]  Paulo Leitão,et al.  Past, Present, and Future of Industrial Agent Applications , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[9]  Hendrik Van Brussel,et al.  A Service-Oriented Approach for Holonic Manufacturing Control and Beyond , 2012, Service Orientation in Holonic and Multi-Agent Manufacturing Control.

[10]  Olli Ventä,et al.  Intelligent Products and Systems. Technology theme: Final report , 2007 .

[11]  José Barbosa,et al.  Dynamic self-organization in holonic multi-agent manufacturing systems: The ADACOR evolution , 2015, Comput. Ind..

[12]  Danny B. Lange,et al.  Agent design patterns: elements of agent application design , 1998, AGENTS '98.

[13]  Wei Xiang,et al.  Industrial applications of the ant colony optimization algorithm , 2006 .

[14]  Karlos Artto,et al.  Intelligent products - a step towards a more effective project delivery chain , 2003, Comput. Ind..

[15]  P. Castagna,et al.  A multi-agent based conflict-free routing approach of bi-directional automated guided vehicles , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[16]  Danny Weyns,et al.  Delegate MAS patterns for large-scale distributed coordination and control applications , 2010, EuroPLoP.

[17]  Danny Weyns,et al.  Patterns of Delegate MAS , 2009, 2009 Third IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems.

[18]  Jan Holmström,et al.  Intelligent Products: A survey , 2009, Comput. Ind..

[19]  Anand S. Rao,et al.  BDI Agents: From Theory to Practice , 1995, ICMAS.

[20]  Tom Holvoet,et al.  (No) more design patterns for multi-agent systems , 2011, SPLASH Workshops.

[21]  Douglas H. Norrie,et al.  Agent-Based Systems for Intelligent Manufacturing: A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1999, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[22]  Paulo Leitão Towards Self-organized Service-Oriented Multi-agent Systems , 2013, Service Orientation in Holonic and Multi Agent Manufacturing and Robotics.

[23]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Situated agents can have goals , 1990, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[24]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Foundations of distributed artificial intelligence , 1996, Sixth-generation computer technology series.

[25]  H. Van Dyke Parunak,et al.  Concurrent Modeling of Alternative Worlds with Polyagents , 2006, MABS.

[26]  Danny Weyns,et al.  Anticipatory Vehicle Routing using Delegate Multi-Agent Systems , 2007, 2007 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference.

[27]  Paulo Leitão,et al.  ADACOR: A holonic architecture for agile and adaptive manufacturing control , 2006, Comput. Ind..

[28]  Pierre Verbaeten,et al.  Ant Algorithms in a Graph Environment: a Meta-scheme for Coordination and Control , 2002 .