A spatial distribution measure and collision analysis technique for distributed space systems

Abstract A distributed space system (DSS) is an architecture with more than one spacecraft to achieve a common objective. A number of questions arise with respect to the characteristics and dynamics of distributed system in space. How fast is the system spreading? How are the elements within the system distributed? Is it tightly or loosely packed? What is the effect of perturbations on its absolute and relative dynamics? What are the chances of a collision within the system? There has not been much research in these areas concerning a DSS. In this paper, quantitative metrics are established that allow characterizing DSS and assisting in answering above questions. Key performance indicators for a DSS are identified as size or envelope of the cluster, a distribution measure, and a measure for collision. Determining the geometric system size is straightforward through numerical or analytical propagation methods. The focus of this paper will be on the other two metrics: a cluster distribution index (CDI) and a measure for collision probability within the system. The distribution index can be used to assess the effectiveness of DSS in meeting system requirements such as coverage and resolution. An n-dimensional grid-based numerical approach is used to evaluate CDI. The collisions analysis using line-integral method (CALM) is proposed as an effective and efficient approach to analyzing collision probability within DSS. Results show that the CDI is an effective indicator to assess the influence of perturbations, such as differential drag, on spatial distribution of the system. The CALM approach is three orders of magnitude faster than existing approaches that evaluate collision probability for non-linear motion.

[1]  S. Janson,et al.  The Next Little Thing: Femtosatellites , 2013 .

[2]  John L. Junkins,et al.  Spacecraft Formation Flying Control using Mean Orbit Elements , 2000 .

[3]  Chris J. M. Verhoeven,et al.  On the reliability, availability, and throughput of satellite swarms , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[4]  Jian Guo,et al.  Survey of worldwide pico- and nanosatellite missions, distributions and subsystem technology , 2010 .

[5]  Lauwerens Kuipers,et al.  Uniform distribution of sequences , 1974 .

[6]  Eberhard Gill,et al.  Enhancing ground communication of distributed space systems , 2013 .

[7]  Martin Sweeting,et al.  A low-cost femtosatellite to enable distributed space missions , 2006 .

[8]  W. E. Morrow,et al.  The West Ford experiment—An introduction to this issue , 1964 .

[9]  Christian Bettstetter,et al.  Measuring Inhomogeneity in Spatial Distributions , 2008, VTC Spring 2008 - IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference.

[10]  Maruthi R. Akella,et al.  Probability of Collision Between Space Objects , 2000 .

[11]  Marinus Jan Bentum,et al.  Olfar, A Radio Telescope Based on Nano-Satellites in Moon Orbit , 2010 .

[12]  Eberhard Gill,et al.  Systematic identification of applications for a cluster of femto-satellites , 2010 .

[13]  Russell P. Patera,et al.  Satellite Collision Probability for Nonlinear Relative Motion , 2002 .

[14]  R. Patera General Method for Calculating Satellite Collision Probability , 2001 .

[15]  Martin Sweeting,et al.  Very-Small-Satellite Design for Distributed Space Missions , 2007 .

[16]  K. W. Yates,et al.  Assessment of the NASA Evolve Long-Term Orbital Debris Evolution Model. , 1995 .

[17]  Salvatore Alfanol,et al.  A Numerical Implementation of Spherical Object Collision Probability , 2005 .

[18]  Deok-Jin Lee,et al.  Probability of Collision Error Analysis , 1999 .

[19]  Jian Guo,et al.  Fractionated space infrastructure for long-term earth observation missions , 2013, 2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[20]  Krishna Dev Kumar,et al.  Design of a COTS Femtosatellite and Mission , 2007 .

[21]  C. Sabol,et al.  Satellite Formation Flying Design and Evolution , 2001 .