Paradoxical increase in cigarette smuggling after the market opening in Taiwan

Objectives: To assess the magnitude of cigarette smuggling after the market opened in Taiwan. Methods: Review of tobacco industry documents for references to smuggling activities related to Taiwan and government statistics on seizure of smuggled cigarettes. Results: The market opening in 1987 led to an increase in smuggling. Contraband cigarettes became as available as legal ones, with only a small fraction (8%) being seized. Being specifically excluded from the market-opening, Japan entered the Taiwan market by setting up a Swiss plant as a legal cover for smuggling 10–20 times its legal quota of exports to Taiwan. Smuggling in Taiwan contributed to increased consumption of foreign brands, particularly by the young. Taiwan, not a member of the World Health Organization, was excluded from the East Asian 16-member “Project Crocodile”, a regional anti-smuggling collaborative effort to implement the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Conclusions: Taiwan showed a sharp increase in smuggling after market liberalisation. Being excluded from the international community, Taiwan faces an uphill battle to fight smuggling alone. If Taiwan remained as its weakest link, global efforts to reduce tobacco use will be undermined, particularly for countries in the East Asian region.

[1]  C. Wen,et al.  How opening the cigarette market led to an increase in betel quid use in Taiwan. , 2005, Public health.

[2]  D. Levy,et al.  The effect of the market opening on trends in smoking rates in Taiwan. , 2005, Health policy.

[3]  D. Levy,et al.  Uncovering the relation between betel quid chewing and cigarette smoking in Taiwan , 2005, Tobacco Control.

[4]  D. Levy,et al.  Increasing taxes to reduce smoking prevalence and smoking attributable mortality in Taiwan: results from a tobacco policy simulation model , 2005, Tobacco Control.

[5]  D T Levy,et al.  Are marketing campaigns in Taiwan by foreign tobacco companies targeting young smokers? , 2005, Tobacco Control.

[6]  C. Wen.  Facilitating the critical process in tobacco control , 2005, Tobacco Control.

[7]  C. Wen,et al.  The impact of the cigarette market opening in Taiwan , 2005, Tobacco Control.

[8]  S. Schroeder,et al.  Tobacco control in the wake of the 1998 master settlement agreement. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  H. Sung,et al.  The behaviour of purchasing smuggled cigarettes in Taiwan , 2003, Tobacco control.

[10]  D. Yach,et al.  Trends and affordability of cigarette prices: ample room for tax increases and related health gains , 2002, Tobacco control.

[11]  F. Chaloupka,et al.  Tobacco Control in Developing Countries , 2001 .

[12]  W. M. Morrison.  Section 301 of The Trade Act of 1974, As Amended: Its Operation and Issues Involving its Use by the United States , 2000 .

[13]  L. Joossens,et al.  Cigarette smuggling in Europe: who really benefits? , 1998, Tobacco control.

[14]  T. Houston.  The Cigarette Papers , 1996 .

[15]  S. Chapman.  The Cigarette Papers , 1996 .

[16]  F. Chaloupka,et al.  U.S. Trade Policy and Cigarette Smoking in Asia , 1996 .

[17]  G. Guindon,et al.  Tobacco control country profiles , 2003 .

[18]  J. D. Beyer,et al.  Understand, measure, and combat tobacco smuggling , 2001 .

[19]  Rowena Jacobs,et al.  The taxation of tobacco products , 2001 .

[20]  F. Chaloupka,et al.  How big is the worldwide cigarette-smuggling problem ? 1 , 2001 .

[21]  M. Corrao.  Tobacco control country profiles , 2000 .

[22]  中華民國行政院主計處.  Statistical yearbook of the Republic of China , 1975 .