论文信息 - Weighted Attacks in Argumentation Frameworks

Weighted Attacks in Argumentation Frameworks

Recently, (Dunne et al. 2009; 2011) have suggested to weight attacks within Dung's abstract argumentation frameworks, and introduced the concept of WAF (Weighted Argumentation Framework). However, they use WAFS in a very specific way for relaxing attacks. The aim of this paper is to explore ways to take advantage of attacks weights within an argumentation process. Two different approaches are considered: The first one extends the proposal by (Dunne et al. 2011) and accounts for other aggregation functions than sum in the objective of relaxing attacks. The second one shows how weights can be exploited to strengthen the usual notion of defence, leading to new concepts of extensions.

Sébastien Konieczny | Pierre Marquis | Sylvie Coste-Marquis | Mohand Akli Ouali

[1] Phan Minh Dung,et al. On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[2] Michael Wooldridge,et al. Inconsistency tolerance in weighted argument systems , 2009, AAMAS.

[3] Michael Wooldridge,et al. Weighted argument systems: Basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results , 2011, Artif. Intell..

[4] Srdjan Vesic,et al. Two Roles of Preferences in Argumentation Frameworks , 2011, ECSQARU.

[5] Nicolas Maudet,et al. On the outcomes of multiparty persuasion , 2011, AAMAS.

[6] Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks , 2003, J. Log. Comput..

[7] Guillermo Ricardo Simari,et al. An Abstract Argumentation Framework with Varied-Strength Attacks , 2008, KR.

[8] Claudette Cayrol,et al. A Reasoning Model Based on the Production of Acceptable Arguments , 2002, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[9] Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. Value-based argumentation frameworks , 2002, NMR.

[10] Sébastien Konieczny,et al. On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems , 2007, Artif. Intell..