Applying Value Sensitive Design (VSD) to Wind Turbines and Wind Parks: An Exploration

Community acceptance still remains a challenge for wind energy projects. The most popular explanation for local opposition, the Not in My Backyard effect, has received fierce criticism in the past decade. Critics argue that opposition is not merely a matter of selfishness or ignorance, but that moral, ecological and aesthetic values play an important role. In order to better take such values into account, a more bottom-up, participatory decision process is usually proposed. Research on this topic focusses on either stakeholder motivations/attitudes, or their behavior during project implementation. This paper proposes a third research focus, namely the ‘objects’ which elicit certain behavioral responses and attitudes—the wind turbine and parks. More concretely, this paper explores Value Sensitive Design (VSD) as way to arrive at wind turbines and parks that better embed or reflect key values. After a critical discussion of the notion of acceptance versus acceptability and support, the paper discusses existing literature on ecology and aesthetics in relation to wind turbine/park design, which could serve as ‘building blocks’ of a more integral VSD approach of the topic. It also discusses the challenge of demarcating wind park projects as VSD projects. A further challenge is that VSD has been applied mainly at the level of technical artifacts, whereas wind parks can best be conceptualized as socio-technical system. This new application would therefore expand the current practice of VSD, and may as a consequence also lead to interesting new insights for the VSD community. The paper concludes that such an outcome-oriented approach of wind turbines and park is worth exploring further, as a supplement to rather than a replacement of the process-oriented approach that is promoted by the current literature on community acceptance of wind parks.

[1]  Eefje Cuppen,et al.  Responsible innovation as an endorsement of public values: the need for interdisciplinary research , 2014 .

[2]  Neelke Doorn Lotte Asveld and Sabine Roeser (eds), The Ethics of Technological Risk , 2009, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[3]  C. Gross,et al.  Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance , 2007 .

[4]  Dan van der Horst,et al.  Exploring the landscape of wind farm developments; local area characteristics and planning process outcomes in rural England , 2010 .

[5]  Tim Sharpe,et al.  Visual And Physical Integration In Building Mounted Wind Turbines – An Alternative Approach , 2010 .

[6]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support , 2000 .

[7]  Mhairi Aitken,et al.  Why we still don't understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature , 2010 .

[8]  Sabine Roeser,et al.  The Ethics of Technological Risk , 2009 .

[9]  A.W.M. Meijers,et al.  Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences , 2009 .

[10]  Tim Gray,et al.  Offshore wind farms and commercial fisheries in the UK: A study in Stakeholder Consultation , 2005 .

[11]  S. Mathew,et al.  2.05 – Wind Turbines: Evolution, Basic Principles, and Classifications , 2012 .

[12]  Gillian Irene Bristow,et al.  Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development , 2011 .

[13]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study , 2010 .

[14]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Near-shore Wind Power - Protected Seascapes, Environmentalists' Attitudes, and the Technocratic Planning Perspective , 2010 .

[15]  A. Jobert,et al.  Local acceptance of wind energy: Factors of success identified in French and German case studies , 2007 .

[16]  Bela H. Buck,et al.  Marine Aquaculture within Offshore Wind Farms: Social Aspects of Multiple-Use Planning , 2009 .

[17]  Artie Ng,et al.  Paths to Sustainable Energy , 2010 .

[18]  Alain Nadaï,et al.  Birds, Wind and the Making of Wind Power Landscapes in Aude, Southern France , 2010 .

[19]  John Earman,et al.  Handbook of philosophy of science , 2007 .

[20]  Tore Wizelius,et al.  Developing Wind Power Projects: Theory and Practice , 2006 .

[21]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[22]  Peter Kroes,et al.  Treating socio-technical systems as engineering systems: some conceptual problems , 2006 .

[23]  Jacob Ladenburg,et al.  Willingness to pay for reduced visual disamenities from offshore wind farms in denmark , 2007 .

[24]  R. Künneke Institutional reform and technological practice: the case of electricity , 2008 .

[25]  A. Blowers Why dump on us? Power, pragmatism and the periphery in the siting of new nuclear reactors in the UK , 2010 .

[26]  C. Anderson The networked minority: How a small group prevailed in a local windfarm conflict , 2013 .

[27]  Paul Gipe,et al.  The Wind Industry’s Experience with Aesthetic Criticism , 2017 .

[28]  Lambèr M. M. Royakkers,et al.  Ethics, Technology, and Engineering: An Introduction , 2011 .

[29]  Richard C. Dorf,et al.  Wind Power in View: Energy Landscapes in a Crowded World , 2002 .

[30]  Ibo van de Poel,et al.  Translating Values into Design Requirements , 2013 .

[31]  J. Rawls A Theory of Justice , 1999 .

[32]  David Bidwell,et al.  The role of values in public beliefs and attitudes towards commercial wind energy , 2013 .

[33]  Peta Ashworth,et al.  Societal acceptance of wind farms: Analysis of four common themes across Australian case studies , 2013 .

[34]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Invalid theory impedes our understanding: A critique on the persistence of the language of NIMBY , 2006 .

[35]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[36]  Jeremy Firestone,et al.  The Offshore Wind Power Debate: Views from Cape Cod , 2005 .

[37]  Tore Wizelius,et al.  Developing Wind Power Projects , 2007 .

[38]  Ali Sayigh,et al.  Comprehensive Renewable Energy , 2012 .

[39]  E. Kondili,et al.  2.16 – Environmental-Social Benefits/Impacts of Wind Power , 2012 .

[40]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’ , 2007 .

[41]  P. H. Kahn,et al.  Human values, ethics, and design , 2002 .

[42]  Paul Gipe,et al.  Design As If People Matter: Aesthetic Guidelines for a Wind Power Future , 2002 .

[43]  Aimee van Wynsberghe,et al.  Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design , 2013, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[44]  G. T. Wrixon,et al.  Renewable Energy-2000 , 1993 .

[45]  Dimitris G. Christakis,et al.  Wind Parks Design, Including Representative Case Studies , 2021, Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences.

[46]  Jeremy Firestone,et al.  Public acceptance of offshore wind power projects in the USA , 2009 .

[47]  D. Bell,et al.  Re-visiting the ‘social gap’: public opinion and relations of power in the local politics of wind energy , 2013 .

[48]  M. Flanagan,et al.  Embodying values in technology: Theory and practice , 2008 .

[49]  R. Künneke,et al.  Aligning modes of organization with technology: critical transactions in the reform of infrastructures , 2010 .

[50]  Cristina Cavicchioli,et al.  SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE OF WIND ENERGY PROJECTS , 2011 .

[51]  Peter Kroes,et al.  Modelling infrastructures as socio-technical systems , 2006, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructures.

[52]  Predrag V. Klasnja,et al.  Envisioning systemic effects on persons and society throughout interactive system design , 2008, DIS '08.

[53]  Behnam Taebi,et al.  To Recycle or Not to Recycle? An Intergenerational Approach to Nuclear Fuel Cycles , 2007, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[54]  Alan Borning,et al.  Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Methods , 2002 .

[55]  Alan Borning,et al.  Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems , 2020, The Ethics of Information Technologies.

[56]  Alan Borning,et al.  Next steps for value sensitive design , 2012, CHI.

[57]  Jeroen van den Hoven,et al.  Information Technology and Moral Philosophy , 2008 .

[58]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion , 2013 .

[59]  Johannes M. Bauer,et al.  Designing Socio-Technical Systems , 2009 .

[60]  Claire Haggett,et al.  Understanding public responses to offshore wind power , 2011 .

[61]  Ibo van de Poel,et al.  Values in Engineering Design , 2009 .

[62]  Julia Fernandez Chozas,et al.  Introduction Of Wavestar Wave Energy Converters At The Danish Offshore Wind Power Plant Horns Rev 2 , 2012 .

[63]  Jeroen van den Hoven,et al.  Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design , 2015 .

[64]  Noëmi Manders-Huits,et al.  What Values in Design? The Challenge of Incorporating Moral Values into Design , 2010, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[65]  H. Bressers,et al.  Facilitating Sustainable Innovations : Sustainable Innovation as a Tool for Regional Development , 2008 .

[66]  Mary L Cummings,et al.  Integrating ethics in design through the value-sensitive design approach , 2006, Science and engineering ethics.