Linguistic/Rhetorical Measures for International Persuasive Student Writing

This research developed linguistic/rhetorical measures to ana- lyze and evaluate argumentative/persuasive student writing. 150 essays written for the IEA International Study of Written Composition by high school students from three English-speaking countries were used to test these measures. In a multiple regression analysis with an im- pressionistic holistic rating as the dependent variable, 1 1 independent variables explained 61 percent of the variation in the holistic score. The Toulmin measure, credibility appeal, and the syntactic factor of Abstract versus Situated Style were the best predictors of writing quality. Implications of this research for the evaluating and teaching of ar- gumentative/persuasive writing are discussed.

[1]  Melvin R. Andrade Writing Across Languages: Analysis of L2 Text. Ulla Connor and Robert B. Kaplan (Eds.) , 1990 .

[2]  Douglas Biber,et al.  A Textual Comparison of British and American Writing , 1987 .

[3]  John C. Mellon Transformational Sentence Combining: A Method for Enhancing the Development of Syntactic Fluency in English Composition , 1969 .

[4]  K. Allan,et al.  Coherence and Composition: A Symposium , 1986 .

[5]  B. Meyer The organization of prose and its effects on memory , 1975 .

[6]  Liisa Lautamatti,et al.  Observations on the Development of the Topic in Simplified Discourse , 1978 .

[7]  D. Biber,et al.  Investigating macroscopic textual variation through multifeature/multidimensional analyses , 1985 .

[8]  Sandra A. Stotsky Sentence Combining as a Curricular Activity: Its Effects on Written Language Development and Reading Comprehension. , 1975 .

[9]  Stephen P. Witte,et al.  Topical Structure and Revision: An Exploratory Study. , 1983 .

[10]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[11]  Barbara J. O'Keefe,et al.  Construct comprehensiveness and cognitive complexity as predictors of the number and strategic adaptation of arguments and appeals in a persuasive message , 1979 .

[12]  Kellogg W. Hunt,et al.  Grammatical Structures Written at Three Grade Levels. NCTE Research Report No. 3. , 1965 .

[13]  U. Connor A study of cohesion and coherence in English as a second language students’ writing , 1984 .

[14]  K. W. Hunt Grammatical structures written at three grade levels , 1965 .

[15]  Ch. Perelman The realm of rhetoric , 1982 .

[16]  D. Biber Spoken and Written Textual Dimensions in English: Resolving the Contradictory Findings , 1986 .

[17]  Frank O'Hare,et al.  Sentence Combining: Improving Student Writing without Formal Grammar Instruction. NCTE Committee on Research Report Series. No. 15. , 1973 .

[18]  Robert J. Connors,et al.  The Rise and Fall of the Modes of Discourse , 1981, College Composition & Communication.

[19]  L. Phelps Dialectics of Coherence: Toward an Integrative Theory. , 1985 .

[20]  P. Carrell Cohesion Is Not Coherence , 1982 .

[21]  Ulla Connor,et al.  Understanding persuasive essay writing: Linguistic/rhetorical approach , 1985 .

[22]  S. Takala,et al.  International perspective on the evaluation of written composition , 1982 .

[23]  Ulla Connor,et al.  Second Language Writing: The teaching of topical structure analysis as a revision strategy for ESL writers , 1990 .

[24]  James A. Berlin,et al.  Current-Traditional Rhetoric: Paradigm and Practice. , 1980 .

[25]  Susan L. Kline,et al.  The development of persuasive communication strategies in kindergarteners through twelfth‐graders , 1979 .

[26]  S. Toulmin The uses of argument , 1960 .