Towards a Quantum World Wide Web

Abstract We elaborate a quantum model for the meaning associated with corpora of written documents, like the pages forming the World Wide Web. To that end, we are guided by how physicists constructed quantum theory for microscopic entities, which unlike classical objects cannot be fully represented in our spatial theater. We suggest that a similar construction needs to be carried out by linguists and computational scientists, to capture the full meaning carried by collections of documental entities. More precisely, we show how to associate a quantum-like ‘entity of meaning’ to a ‘language entity formed by printed documents’, considering the latter as the collection of traces that are left by the former, in specific results of search actions that we describe as measurements. In other words, we offer a perspective where a collection of documents, like the Web, is described as the space of manifestation of a more complex entity – the QWeb – which is the object of our modeling, drawing its inspiration from previous studies on operational-realistic approaches to quantum physics and quantum modeling of human cognition and decision-making. We emphasize that a consistent QWeb model needs to account for the observed correlations between words appearing in printed documents, e.g., co-occurrences, as the latter would depend on the ‘meaning connections’ existing between the concepts that are associated with these words. In that respect, we show that both ‘context and interference (quantum) effects’ are generally required to explain all possible probabilities calculated by counting the relative number of documents containing certain words and co-occurrences of words.

[1]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum structure and human thought. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[2]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Interpreting Quantum Particles as Conceptual Entities , 2010, 1004.2531.

[3]  Dimitri Kartsaklis,et al.  Open System Categorical Quantum Semantics in Natural Language Processing , 2015, CALCO.

[4]  Jian-Yun Nie,et al.  Modeling latent topic interactions using quantum interference for information retrieval , 2013, CIKM.

[5]  Peter Bruza,et al.  Quantum Logic of Semantic Space: An Exploratory Investigation of Context Effects in Practical Reasoning , 2005, We Will Show Them!.

[6]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  The Potential of Quantum Probability for Modeling Cognitive Processes , 2011, CogSci.

[7]  Dawei Song,et al.  Characterizing Pure High-Order Entanglements in Lexical Semantic Spaces via Information Geometry , 2009, QI.

[8]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Structure in Cognition , 2008, 0805.3850.

[9]  Guido Zuccon,et al.  Using the Quantum Probability Ranking Principle to Rank Interdependent Documents , 2010, ECIR.

[10]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Do spins have directions? , 2015, Soft Comput..

[11]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum theory and human perception of the macro-world , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[12]  Massimo Melucci,et al.  A Quantum Query Expansion Approach for Session Search , 2016, Entropy.

[13]  A. Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum Social Science , 2013 .

[14]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Ubiquitous Quantum Structure , 2010 .

[15]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Quantum aspects of semantic analysis and symbolic artificial intelligence , 2003, quant-ph/0309022.

[16]  Maristella Agosti,et al.  A two-level hypertext retrieval model for legal data , 1991, SIGIR '91.

[17]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  La mecánica cuántica y la conceptualidad: materia, historias, semántica y espacio-tiempo , 2013 .

[18]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence , 1996 .

[19]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Testing Quantum Models of Conjunction Fallacy on the World Wide Web , 2016, International Journal of Theoretical Physics.

[20]  Diederik Aerts BEING AND CHANGE: FOUNDATIONS OF A REALISTIC OPERATIONAL FORMALISM , 2002 .

[21]  J. Hampton Overextension of Conjunctive Concepts: Evidence for a Unitary Model of Concept Typicality and Class Inclusion , 1988 .

[22]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Concepts and Their Dynamics: A Quantum-Theoretic Modeling of Human Thought , 2012, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[23]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  The Quantum Challenge in Concept Theory and Natural Language Processing , 2013, ArXiv.

[24]  T. Landauer,et al.  Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis , 1990 .

[25]  S. Peters,et al.  Word Vectors and Quantum Logic Experiments with negation and disjunction , 2003 .

[26]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  The Unreasonable Success of Quantum Probability I: Quantum Measurements as Uniform Fluctuations , 2014, 1401.2647.

[27]  C. J. van Rijsbergen,et al.  What can quantum theory bring to information retrieval , 2010, CIKM.

[28]  Jerome R Busemeyer,et al.  Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling? , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[29]  J. Hampton,et al.  Disjunction of natural concepts , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[30]  C. J. van Rijsbergen,et al.  The geometry of information retrieval , 2004 .

[31]  Giacomo Mauro D'Ariano,et al.  2 Quantum Tomographic Methods , 2004 .

[32]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Context and Interference Effects in the Combinations of Natural Concepts , 2016, CONTEXT.

[33]  Jennifer S Trueblood,et al.  A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors. , 2011, Psychological review.

[34]  Fabio Crestani,et al.  Automatic authoring and construction of hypermedia for information retrieval , 1995, Multimedia Systems.

[35]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Identifying Quantum Structures in the Ellsberg Paradox , 2013, International Journal of Theoretical Physics.

[36]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  The Pet-Fish Problem on the World-Wide Web , 2010, AAAI Fall Symposium: Quantum Informatics for Cognitive, Social, and Semantic Processes.

[37]  Peng Zhang,et al.  An adaptive contextual quantum language model , 2016 .

[38]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A Potentiality and Conceptuality Interpretation of Quantum Physics , 2010, Philosophica.

[39]  Massimo Melucci,et al.  Contextual Search: A Computational Framework , 2012, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..

[40]  Gerard Salton,et al.  A vector space model for automatic indexing , 1975, CACM.

[41]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Theory and Conceptuality: Matter, Stories, Semantics and Space-Time , 2011, 1110.4766.

[42]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Hierarchical Topic Models and the Nested Chinese Restaurant Process , 2003, NIPS.

[43]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  A quantum probability explanation for violations of ‘rational’ decision theory , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  Dawei Song,et al.  Modeling Quantum Entanglements in Quantum Language Models , 2015, IJCAI.

[45]  Massimo Melucci,et al.  Introduction to Information Retrieval and Quantum Mechanics , 2015, The Information Retrieval Series.

[46]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  On the Foundations of the Brussels Operational-Realistic Approach to Cognition , 2015, Front. Phys..

[47]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Structure in Cognition: Why and How Concepts Are Entangled , 2011, QI.

[48]  William Blacoe,et al.  Semantic Composition Inspired by Quantum Measurement , 2014, QI.

[49]  Diederik Aerts Measuring Meaning on the World-Wide Web , 2010, ArXiv.

[50]  Robert E. Innis,et al.  Semiotics: An Introductory Anthology , 1985 .

[51]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision , 2012 .

[52]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  An introduction to latent semantic analysis , 1998 .

[53]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Entanglement in Concept Combinations , 2013, ArXiv.

[54]  Fabio A. González,et al.  Quantum Latent Semantic Analysis , 2011, ICTIR.

[55]  C. J. van Rijsbergen,et al.  Supporting polyrepresentation in a quantum-inspired geometrical retrieval framework , 2010, IIiX.

[56]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Interference and Superposition in Cognition: Development of a Theory for the Disjunction of Concepts , 2007, 0705.0975.

[57]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[58]  Dawei Song,et al.  Mining pure high-order word associations via information geometry for information retrieval , 2013, TOIS.

[59]  C. J. van Rijsbergen,et al.  Eraser Lattices and Semantic Contents , 2009, QI.

[60]  Dawei Song,et al.  Exploration of Quantum Interference in Document Relevance Judgement Discrepancy , 2016, Entropy.

[61]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Particles as Conceptual Entities: A Possible Explanatory Framework for Quantum Theory , 2009, 1004.2530.