A critical view on transport and entanglement in models of photosynthesis

We revisit critically the recent claims, inspired by quantum optics and quantum information, that there is entanglement in the biological pigment–protein complexes, and that it is responsible for the high transport efficiency. While unexpectedly long coherence times were experimentally demonstrated, the existence of entanglement is, at the moment, a purely theoretical conjecture; it is this conjecture that we analyse. As demonstrated by a toy model, a similar transport phenomenology can be obtained without generating entanglement. Furthermore, we also argue that, even if entanglement does exist, it is purely incidental and seems to play no essential role for the transport efficiency. We emphasize that our paper is not a proof that entanglement does not exist in light-harvesting complexes—this would require a knowledge of the system and its parameters well beyond the state of the art. Rather, we present a counter-example to the recent claims of entanglement, showing that the arguments, as they stand at the moment, are not sufficiently justified and hence cannot be taken as a proof for the existence of entanglement, let alone of its essential role, in the excitation transport.

[1]  G. Tóth,et al.  Entanglement detection , 2008, 0811.2803.

[2]  V. May,et al.  Exciton exciton annihilation dynamics in chromophore complexes. II. Intensity dependent transient absorption of the LH2 antenna system. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[3]  M. Wilde,et al.  Identifying the quantum correlations in light-harvesting complexes , 2009, 0912.5112.

[4]  Andreas Buchleitner,et al.  Efficient and coherent excitation transfer across disordered molecular networks. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  W. Wootters Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits , 1997, quant-ph/9709029.

[6]  T. Mančal,et al.  Evidence for wavelike energy transfer through quantum coherence in photosynthetic systems , 2007, Nature.

[7]  M. Ali Can,et al.  Single-particle entanglement , 2004 .

[8]  Animesh Datta,et al.  Entanglement and entangling power of the dynamics in light-harvesting complexes , 2009, 0912.0122.

[9]  Justin R Caram,et al.  Long-lived quantum coherence in photosynthetic complexes at physiological temperature , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  K. B. Whaley,et al.  Quantum entanglement phenomena in photosynthetic light harvesting complexes , 2010, 1012.4059.

[11]  L. Mandel,et al.  Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics , 1995 .

[12]  M. Lewenstein,et al.  Quantum Entanglement , 2020, Quantum Mechanics.

[13]  Robert Eugene Blankenship Molecular mechanisms of photosynthesis , 2002 .

[14]  Alexander Eisfeld,et al.  Equivalence of quantum and classical coherence in electronic energy transfer. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  Animesh Datta,et al.  Highly efficient energy excitation transfer in light-harvesting complexes: The fundamental role of n , 2009, 0901.4454.

[16]  R. Gilmore,et al.  Coherent states: Theory and some Applications , 1990 .

[17]  G. Fleming,et al.  Quantum superpositions in photosynthetic light harvesting: delocalization and entanglement , 2010 .

[18]  S. J. van Enk,et al.  Single-particle entanglement , 2005 .

[19]  K. B. Whaley,et al.  Quantum entanglement in photosynthetic light-harvesting complexes , 2009, 0905.3787.

[20]  Gregory D. Scholes,et al.  Coherently wired light-harvesting in photosynthetic marine algae at ambient temperature , 2010, Nature.

[21]  Klauder,et al.  SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.

[22]  Alexandra Olaya-Castro,et al.  Distribution of entanglement in light-harvesting complexes and their quantum efficiency , 2010, 1003.3610.

[23]  R. Hildner,et al.  Femtosecond coherence and quantum control of single molecules at room temperature , 2010, 1012.2366.