Things That Go Together: A Review of Stimulus-Response Compatibility and Related Effects

[1]  P M FITTS,et al.  Some relations between stimulus patterns and performance in a continuous dual-pursuit task. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  W. E. Hick.  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[3]  W B KNOWLES,et al.  The effect of speed and load on display-control relationships. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  E. R. Grossman.  Entropy and choice time: The effect of frequency unbalance on choice-response , 1953 .

[5]  P. Fitts,et al.  S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  W. D. Garvey,et al.  Response time patterns associated with various display-control relationships. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  L. Gregg,et al.  The effect of stimulus complexity on discriminative responses. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  R. L. Deininger,et al.  S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  Alphonse Chapanis,et al.  Expected Locations of Digits and Letters on Ten-Button Keysets* , 1955 .

[10]  W. D. Garvey,et al.  Effect of additional spatial references on display-control efficiency. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  D. A. Grant,et al.  Learning and performance on a key-pressing task as function of the degree of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  E. A. Alluisi,et al.  An information analysis of verbal and motor responses in a forced-paced serial task. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  E. A. Alluisi,et al.  The empirical validity of equal discriminability scaling. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  E A ALLUISI,et al.  Verbal and motor responses to seven symbolic visual codes: a study in S-R compatibility. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  M. V. Rhoades,et al.  On the Reduction of Choice Reaction Times with Practice , 1959 .

[17]  J. A. Leonard.  Tactual Choice Reactions: I , 1959 .

[18]  G. Mowbray.  Choice Reaction Times for Skilled Responses* , 1960 .

[19]  W. Pierson,et al.  Generality of a Speed Factor in Simple Reaction and Movement Time , 1960 .

[20]  E. A. Alluisi,et al.  Toward Optimizing Man's Tactile Communication , 1961 .

[21]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Stimulus-Response Compatibility in the Paired-Associate Learning of Nonsense Syllables , 1961, Nature.

[22]  P. Fitts,et al.  Cognitive aspects of information processing: I. The familiarity of S-R sets and subsets. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  E. A. Alluisi,et al.  Some variables influencing the rate of gain of information. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  E. Alluisi,et al.  Predicting Letter Preferences: Aesthetics and Filtering in Man , 1962 .

[25]  E A ALLUISI,et al.  CHOICE TIME AS A FUNCTION OF STIMULUS DISSIMILARITY AND DISCRIMINABILITY. , 1963, Canadian journal of psychology.

[26]  E. Alluisi.  Frequencies, Preferences, and Choice Reactions to Letters , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.

[27]  E. A. Alluisi,et al.  Stimulus- response compatibility and the rate of gain of information , 1964 .

[28]  E A ALLUISI,et al.  Interaction of S-R Compatibility and the Rate of Gain of Information , 1965, Perceptual and motor skills.

[29]  Earl A. Alluisi,et al.  Effects of discriminability and irrelevant information on absolute judgments’ , 1967 .

[30]  Earl A. Alluisi,et al.  Effects of stimulus-response uncertainty on watchkeeping performance and choice reactions , 1967 .

[31]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  J R Simon,et al.  Effect of ear stimulated on reaction time and movement time. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  E. Smith,et al.  Choice reaction time: an analysis of the major theoretical positions. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[34]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Reactions toward the source of stimulation. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Temporal and symbolic S-R compatibility in a sequential information-processing task , 1969 .

[36]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[37]  J R Simon,et al.  Processing symbolic information from a visual display: interference from an irrelevant directional cue. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[38]  W. R. Garner,et al.  The Stimulus in Information Processing , 1970 .

[39]  J R Simon,et al.  Effects of an irrelevant auditory stimulus on visual choice reaction time. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Manipulating the strength of a stereotype: Interference effects in an auditory information-processing task , 1970 .

[41]  J R Simon,et al.  Auditory S-R compatibility: reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[42]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Influence of temporal uncertainty and sensory modality of signals on watchkeeping performance , 1971 .

[43]  R. Wallace,et al.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[44]  P Cairney,et al.  Spatial relationships and S-R compatibility. , 1972, Acta psychologica.

[45]  R. Wallace.  Spatiel S-R compatibility effects involving kinesthetic cues. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[46]  H. Shulman,et al.  S-R compatability, response discriminability, and response codes in choice reaction time , 1973 .

[47]  W H Teichner,et al.  Laws of visual choice reaction time. , 1974, Psychological review.

[48]  J. Callan,et al.  Strength of auditory stimulus-response compatibility as a function of task complexity. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[49]  A. Hedge,et al.  The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice response-time. , 1975, Acta psychologica.

[50]  J R Callan,et al.  Lateral stimulus-response compatibility effects in the oculomotor system. , 1975, Acta psychologica.

[51]  O. Tzeng,et al.  A response instruction by visual-field interaction: S-R compatibility effect or? , 1977 .

[52]  J R Simon,et al.  The effect of aging on the stages of processing in a choice reaction time task. , 1978, Journal of gerontology.

[53]  J. Brebner,et al.  The compatibility of spatial and non-spatial relationships , 1979 .

[54]  Earl A. Alluisi,et al.  Stimulus–response compatibility effects in choice reactions and memory scanning. , 1980 .

[55]  O. Tzeng,et al.  Role of cerebral hemispheric processing in the visual half-field stimulus-response compatibility effect. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[56]  A. Katz,et al.  Spatial compatibility effects with hemifield presentation in a unimanual two-finger task. , 1981, Canadian journal of psychology.

[57]  J. Richard Simon,et al.  Effect of compatibility of S-R mapping on reactions toward the stimulus source. , 1981 .

[58]  Stimulus-response compatibility for left-right discriminations as a function of stimulus position. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[59]  S. Lupker,et al.  S-R compatibility effects: Do we need a new theory? , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[60]  J. Miller.  Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: in search of partial output. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[61]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Spatial compatibility effects on the same side of the body midline. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[62]  C. Umilta,et al.  Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[63]  T. G. Reeve,et al.  On the advance preparation of discrete finger responses. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[64]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Must egocentric and environmental frames of reference be aligned to produce spatial S-R compatibility effects? , 1984 .

[65]  Jeff Miller.  A Hand Advantage in Preparation of Simple Keypress Responses: Reply to Reeve and Proctor (1984) , 1985 .

[66]  L. E. Longstreth,et al.  Exceptions to Hick's law: explorations with a response duration measure. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[67]  T. G. Reeve,et al.  Nonmotoric translation processes in the preparation of discrete finger responses: A rebuttal of Miller's (1985) analysis. , 1985 .

[68]  Peter Schroeder-Heister,et al.  Spatial S-R compatibility effects with unimanual two-finger choice reactions for prone and supine hand positions , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[69]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Evidence of preliminary response preparation from a divided attention task. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[70]  L. E. Longstreth,et al.  Hick's Law versus a power law: Reply to Welford. , 1987 .

[71]  A. T. Welford,et al.  Comment on "Exceptions to Hick's law: Explorations with a response duration measure" (Longstreth, El-Zahhar, & Alcorn, 1985). , 1987 .

[72]  Peter Schroeder-Heister,et al.  Spatial S-R compatibility with unimanual two-finger choice reactions: Effects of irrelevant stimulus location , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[73]  Response-compatibility effects in focused-attention tasks: A same-hand advantage in response activation , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[74]  L. E. Longstreth,et al.  Hick’s law: Its limit is 3 bits , 1988 .

[75]  C. Michaels.  S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: Evidence of the detection of affordances. , 1988 .