Organizational Downsizing: From Concepts to Practices

Downsizing is currently one of the most popular strategies being used by organizations in an effort to survive and compete in the current business scenario. Existing literature in the area has broadly focused on the following three issues: Why do organizations downsize? What are the consequences of downsizing on the individual and the organization as a whole? What are the strategies that can be adopted for successful downsizing? While imperatives for downsizing have been considered from economic, institutional, strategic, ideological, and arational perspectives, suggestions for successful downsizing strategies have repeatedly reinforced the importance of adopting a planned, long-term, and people-oriented approach to implementation. The bulk of empirical research, however, appears to have focused on the consequences of downsizing both at the individual and organizational level. Given that downsizing today has achieved the status of an institutionalized norm, the relevant question is not so much whether or why organizations should downsize, but rather, how best to implement the process in a way which will enable organizations to accrue benefits and effectively manage the negative consequences of such an exercise. A review of literature reveals that a planned approach to the implementation process would lead to sustained and long-term benefits to the organization. Drawing from change management theories as well as related theories in organizational learning, theory of business, and business model innovations, this paper has attempted to identify issues that need to be addressed at each stage of downsizing in order to ensure effective implementation. At one level, this would imply a need to question the very rationale for downsizing in terms of whether it really is the best alternative under the existing situation. At another level, assuming that downsizing has been accepted to be the most viable option, and given that any successful planned change would need to be handled as a multi-stage activity, this would include : reframing of the existing mental models and assumptions about the business extensive communication with employees at each stage managing the needs and expectations of survivors, victims, and implementers themselves planning for employability initiatives for employees helping employees to renegotiate their existing psychological contract with the organization. This would necessitate bringing about a change in the mindsets and attitudes of the people involved in the exercise. Moreover, a downsizing exercise would also need to be implemented as a part of an overall corporate renewal package rather than as an isolated strategy on its own. Suggestions for future research in this area, especially in the Indian context, have been identified with a view to adding to the existing body of knowledge and also facilitating greater understanding on the part of practitioners in handling a downsizing exercise.

[1]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[2]  Pradip K. Khandwalla Innovative Corporate Turnarounds , 1992 .

[3]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Financial Consequences of Employment-Change Decisions in Major U.S. Corporations , 1997 .

[4]  S. Robinson,et al.  The toxic handler: organizational hero--and casualty. , 1999, Harvard business review.

[5]  Janet H. Weakland Human Resources Hollistic Approach to Healing Downsizing Survivors , 2001 .

[6]  Michael Basseches,et al.  Dialectical Thinking and Adult Development , 1984 .

[7]  S. Freeman The Gestalt of Organizational Downsizing: Downsizing Strategies as Packages of Change , 1999 .

[8]  J. Brockner,et al.  Procedural Fairness, Managers' Self-Esteem, and Managerial Behaviors Following a Layoff. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[9]  T. Kippenberger The theory of the business , 1997 .

[10]  Katharina Balazs,et al.  The Downside of Downsizing , 1997 .

[11]  S. Floyd,et al.  Dinosaurs or dynamos? Recognizing middle management's strategic role , 1994 .

[12]  Christopher L. Shook,et al.  Downsizing the firm: Answering the strategic questions , 1996 .

[13]  Efrat Elron,et al.  Expatriate managers and the psychological contract. , 1994 .

[14]  Mark A. Mone,et al.  Some Ideological Foundations of Organizational Downsizing , 1998 .

[15]  Gretchen M. Spreitzer,et al.  Explaining How Survivors Respond to Downsizing: The Roles of Trust, Empowerment, Justice, and Work Redesign , 1998 .

[16]  D. Feldman,et al.  Individual Responses to Job Loss: Empirical Findings from Two Field Studies , 1990 .

[17]  J. Purcell,et al.  Managing employee expectations during acquisitions , 2001 .

[18]  Steven M. Sommer,et al.  The Impact of Downsizing on Workplace Attitudes , 1999 .

[19]  Sunil Kumar Maheshwari,et al.  Implementation of VRS in India , 2003 .

[20]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  In search of quality improvement: Problems of design and implementation , 1993 .

[21]  Jonathan D. Linton,et al.  The Role of Relationships and Reciprocity in the Implementation of Process Innovation , 2000 .

[22]  Carol M. Sánchez,et al.  Organizational downsizing: Constraining, cloning, learning , 1995 .

[23]  Arthur G. Bedeian,et al.  The cesspool syndrome: How dreck floats to the top of declining organizations , 1998 .

[24]  J. R. Emshoff How to increase employee loyalty while you downsize , 1994 .

[25]  W. H. Turnley,et al.  Psychological contract violations during corporate restructuring , 1998 .

[26]  M. Venkatraman,et al.  Real Strategies for Virtual Organizing , 1998 .

[27]  Gretchen M. Spreitzer,et al.  Preserving Employee Morale during Downsizing , 1998 .

[28]  Aneil Mishra,et al.  Best practices in white-collar downsizing: managing contradictions , 1991 .

[29]  M. W. P. Savelsbergh,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Analyzing Why Organizations Downsize , 1999 .

[30]  M. Armstrong-Stassen,et al.  The Impact of Layoff Announcements on Shareholders , 1995 .

[31]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Downsizing: What do we know? What have we learned? , 1993 .

[32]  James E. King White‐collar reactions to job insecurity and the role of the psychological contract: Implications for human resource management , 2000 .

[33]  Robert Singh Redefining psychological contracts with the U.S. work force: A critical task for strategic human resource management planners in the 1990s , 1998 .

[34]  Rocki-Lee Dewitt,et al.  Firm, industry, and strategy influences on choice of downsizing approach , 1998 .

[35]  Jun Zhao,et al.  A Sociocognitive Interpretation of Organizational Downsizing , 2000 .

[36]  Steven H. Appelbaum,et al.  The tough test of downsizing , 1987 .

[37]  Fenghueih Huarng,et al.  A study of ISO 9000 process, motivation and performance , 1999 .

[38]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Circular organizing and triple loop learning , 1999 .

[39]  Laurie K. Lewis,et al.  Disseminating Information and Soliciting Input during Planned Organizational Change , 1999 .

[40]  E. Burack,et al.  The New Employment Relations Compact , 1995 .

[41]  Jeremy B. Fox,et al.  Early Retirement Programs and Firm Performance , 1996 .

[42]  Kenneth P. De Meuse,et al.  Announced layoffs: Their effect on corporate financial performance , 1994 .

[43]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  Assessing psychological contracts: Issues, alternatives and measures. , 1998 .

[44]  Gilbert Yip Wei Tan,et al.  Predictors of Coping Behavior after a Layoff , 1998 .

[45]  T. Burrow The human equation. , 1941 .

[46]  P. Shah Network Destruction: The Structural Implications of Downsizing , 2000 .

[47]  P. C. Nutt Implementation Approaches for Project Planning.1 , 1983 .

[48]  G. Hamel Leading the Revolution , 2000 .