Diffusion kurtosis imaging to assess response to treatment in hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to compare diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) with conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for assessing the response to treatment in hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). SUBJECTS AND METHODS Sixty-two consecutive patients with treated or untreated hypervascular HCC underwent MRI of the liver including DKI (b values of 0, 100, 500, 1000, 1500, and 2000 s/mm(2)). The mean kurtosis (MK) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the hepatic parenchyma and of the HCCs were computed. The detectability of viable HCC based on MK and ADC values was compared. We also assessed the correlation between Child-Pugh grades and MK or ADC values. RESULTS For a total of 112 HCC nodules (viable, n = 63; nonviable, n = 49), the MK value was significantly higher for the viable group (mean ± SD, 0.81 ± 0.11) than for the non-viable group (0.57 ± 0.11) (p < 0.001). The mean ADC value was significantly lower for the viable group (1.44 ± 0.42 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) than for the nonviable group (1.94 ± 0.52 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of the ROC curve for the assessment of HCC viability were greater (p < 0.001) using MK (85.7%, 98.0%, and 0.95, respectively; cutoff value = 0.710) than using ADC (79.6%, 68.3%, and 0.77, respectively; cutoff value = 1.535 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s). Although the ADC of hepatic parenchyma was lower in patients with Child-Pugh grade B or C disease than in those with grade A disease (p = 0.02), no significant difference in MK (p = 0.45) was found among the Child-Pugh grades. CONCLUSION DKI can be a new option for the assessment of posttherapeutic response in HCC.

[1]  C. G. Child,et al.  Surgery and portal hypertension. , 1964, Major problems in clinical surgery.

[2]  R. Pugh,et al.  Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices , 1973, The British journal of surgery.

[3]  D. Bihan,et al.  4809701 Method to measure the molecular diffusion and/or perfusion parameters of live tissue , 1991 .

[4]  D. LeBihan,et al.  Molecular diffusion nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. , 1991 .

[5]  D. Le Bihan Molecular diffusion nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. , 1991, Magnetic resonance quarterly.

[6]  J. Helpern,et al.  Diffusional kurtosis imaging: The quantification of non‐gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Bachir Taouli,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MRI for quantification of liver fibrosis: preliminary experience. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  A. Luciani,et al.  Liver Cirrhosis : Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MR Imaging — Pilot Study 1 , 2008 .

[9]  M. Kanematsu,et al.  Evaluating local hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence post‐transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: Is diffusion‐weighted MRI reliable as an indicator? , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  J. Helpern,et al.  MRI quantification of non‐Gaussian water diffusion by kurtosis analysis , 2010, NMR in biomedicine.

[11]  H. Lanfermann,et al.  Cerebral gliomas: diffusional kurtosis imaging analysis of microstructural differences. , 2010, Radiology.

[12]  Yi-Hsin Weng,et al.  Parkinson disease: diagnostic utility of diffusion kurtosis imaging. , 2011, Radiology.

[13]  M. F. Falangola,et al.  Preliminary observations of increased diffusional kurtosis in human brain following recent cerebral infarction , 2011, NMR in biomedicine.

[14]  G. Johnson,et al.  Prostate cancer: feasibility and preliminary experience of a diffusional kurtosis model for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer. , 2012, Radiology.

[15]  J. Soto,et al.  Characterizing non‐gaussian, high b‐value diffusion in liver fibrosis: Stretched exponential and diffusional kurtosis modeling , 2014, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.