Maximized achievable rate of SINR‐measurement‐based spectrum sharing with binary feedback

Motivated by the difficulty in measuring channel state information between heterogeneous primary and secondary systems, we propose a signal-to-interference-noise ratio (SINR)-based spectrum sharing policy. In the proposed spectrum sharing policy, a secondary user who does not cause SINR outage at the primary receiver is admitted to share the primary user's spectrum. In this article, we analyze the achievable rate of a secondary user and for whom the achievable rate is maximized in the SINR-constrained spectrum sharing. The maximized achievable rate is determined by the ratio of the distance between the secondary transmitter and the primary receiver to the distance between the secondary transmitter and receiver, and it is proportional to the distance ratio. In conclusion, secondary links with large distance ratio can support high data rate applications so long as SINR constraint of the primary user is guaranteed. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (Motivated by the difficulty in measuring channel state information between heterogeneous primary and secondary systems, we propose a signal-to-interference-noise ratio(SINR)-based spectrum sharing policy. In the proposed spectrum sharing policy, asecondary user who does not cause SINR outage at the primary receiver is admitted to share the primary users spectrum. In this article, we analyze the achievable rate of a secondary user and for whom the achievable rate is maximized in the SINR-constrained spectrum 17sharing. The maximized achievable rate is determined by the ratio of the distance between the secondary transmitter and the primary receiver to the distance between these condary transmitter and receiver, and it is proportional to the distance ratio. In conclusion, secondary links with large distance ratio can support high data rate applications so long as SINR constrain to of the primary user is guaranteed.)

[1]  Rajarathnam Chandramouli,et al.  Dynamic spectrum access in open spectrum wireless networks , 2006, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[2]  Heinrich Meyr,et al.  The effect of imperfect SNR knowledge on multiantenna multiuser systems with channel aware scheduling , 2003, GLOBECOM '03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489).

[3]  Jon M. Peha,et al.  Approaches to spectrum sharing , 2005, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[4]  Jon M. Peha,et al.  Regulatory and policy issues protecting public safety with better communications systems , 2005, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[5]  Sonia Aïssa,et al.  Ergodic and Outage Capacities of Spectrum-Sharing Systems in Fading Channels , 2007, IEEE GLOBECOM 2007 - IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[6]  Abhay Parekh,et al.  Spectrum sharing for unlicensed bands , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[7]  Halim Yanikomeroglu,et al.  On the impact of the primary network activity on the achievable capacity of spectrum sharing over fading channels , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[8]  Gaston H. Gonnet,et al.  On the LambertW function , 1996, Adv. Comput. Math..

[9]  A. Goldsmith,et al.  Capacity of Nakagami multipath fading channels , 1997, 1997 IEEE 47th Vehicular Technology Conference. Technology in Motion.

[10]  Athanasios Papoulis,et al.  Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes , 1965 .

[11]  Andrea Goldsmith,et al.  Wireless Communications , 2005, 2021 15th International Conference on Advanced Technologies, Systems and Services in Telecommunications (TELSIKS).

[12]  Norman C. Beaulieu,et al.  NDA estimation of SINR for QAM signals , 2005, IEEE Communications Letters.

[13]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.