EBV structural antigens, gp350 and gp85, as targets for ex vivo virus-specific CTL during acute infectious mononucleosis: potential use of gp350/gp85 CTL epitopes for vaccine design.

For many years, EBV vaccine development efforts have concentrated on the use of structural Ag, gp350, and have been directed toward Ab-mediated blocking virus attachment to the target cell. There is increasing evidence to suggest that the development of neutralizing Abs in vaccinated animals does not always correlate with protection; nevertheless, it has been postulated that gp350-specific T cell-mediated immune responses may have an effector role in protection. This hypothesis has largely remained untested. In the present study, we demonstrate that CTL from acute infectious mononucleosis patients display strong ex vivo reactivity against the EBV structural Ags, gp85 and gp350. Moreover, long-term follow up studies on infectious mononucleosis-recovered individuals showed that these individuals maintain gp350- and gp85-specific memory CTL, albeit at low levels, in the peripheral blood. These results strongly suggest that CTL specific for EBV structural proteins may play an important role in the control of EBV infection during acute infection. More importantly, we also show that prior immunization of HLA A2/Kb transgenic mice with gp350 and gp85 CTL epitopes induced a strong epitope-specific CTL response and afforded protection against gp85- or gp350-expressing vaccinia virus challenge. These results have important implications for future EBV vaccine design and provides evidence, for the first time, that CTL epitopes from EBV structural proteins may be used for establishing strong antiviral immunity against EBV infection.

[1]  S. Burrows,et al.  Identification of cytotoxic T cell epitopes within Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) oncogene latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1): evidence for HLA A2 supertype‐restricted immune recognition of EBV‐infected cells by LMP1‐specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes , 1998, European journal of immunology.

[2]  R Khanna,et al.  Tumour surveillance: Missing peptides and MHC molecules , 1998, Immunology and cell biology.

[3]  A. Kumar,et al.  Immediate Early and Early Lytic Cycle Proteins Are Frequent Targets of the Epstein-Barr Virus–induced Cytotoxic T Cell Response , 1997, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[4]  Lunli Yuan,et al.  Comparison of cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses induced by peptide or DNA immunization: Implications on immunogenicity and immunodominance , 1997, European journal of immunology.

[5]  X. Mo,et al.  Recombinant polyepitope vaccines for the delivery of multiple CD8 cytotoxic T cell epitopes. , 1996, Journal of immunology.

[6]  Rekha Khanna,et al.  Recruitment during infectious mononucleosis of CD3+CD4+CD8+ virus-specific cytotoxic T cells which recognise Epstein-Barr virus lytic antigen BHRF1. , 1996, Virology.

[7]  A. D. Wilson,et al.  Virus‐specific cytotoxic T cell responses are associated with immunity of the cottontop tamarin to Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) , 1996, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[8]  R. Khanna,et al.  Immune regulation in Epstein-Barr virus-associated diseases , 1995 .

[9]  S. Burrows,et al.  Copyright � 1995, American Society for Microbiology Immune Regulation in Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Diseases , 2022 .

[10]  D J Moss,et al.  Minimal epitopes expressed in a recombinant polyepitope protein are processed and presented to CD8+ cytotoxic T cells: implications for vaccine design. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  K. Parker,et al.  Scheme for ranking potential HLA-A2 binding peptides based on independent binding of individual peptide side-chains. , 1994, Journal of immunology.

[12]  S. Burrows,et al.  Presentation of endogenous viral peptide epitopes by anti-CD40 stimulated human B cells following recombinant vaccinia infection. , 1993, Journal of immunological methods.

[13]  E. Kieff,et al.  Localization of Epstein-Barr virus cytotoxic T cell epitopes using recombinant vaccinia: implications for vaccine development , 1992, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[14]  A. Morgan Epstein-Barr virus vaccines. , 1992, Vaccine.

[15]  U. Prasad,et al.  Salivary and serum IgA antibodies to the epstein—barr virus glycoprotein gp340: incidence and potential for virus neutralization , 2007, International journal of cancer.

[16]  E. Kieff,et al.  Expression of Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigens in anti-IgM-stimulated B cells following recombinant vaccinia infection and their recognition by human cytotoxic T cells. , 1991, Immunology.

[17]  A. Vitiello,et al.  Analysis of the HLA-restricted influenza-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte response in transgenic mice carrying a chimeric human-mouse class I major histocompatibility complex , 1991, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[18]  S. Burrows,et al.  An Epstein-Barr virus-specific cytotoxic T-cell epitope present on A- and B-type transformants , 1990 .

[19]  B. Morein,et al.  Prevention of Epstein-Barr (EB) virus-induced lymphoma in cottontop tamarins by vaccination with the EB virus envelope glycoprotein gp340 incorporated into immune-stimulating complexes. , 1988, The Journal of general virology.

[20]  M. Epstein,et al.  Recombinant vaccinia virus expressing epstein‐barr virus glycoprotein gp340 protects cottontop tamarins against EB virus‐induced malignant lymphomas , 1988, Journal of medical virology.

[21]  S. Burrows,et al.  Cytotoxic T-cell clones discriminate between A- and B-type Epstein-Barr virus transformants , 1988, Nature.

[22]  P. Cresswell,et al.  Impaired assembly and transport of HLA‐A and ‐B antigens in a mutant TxB cell hybrid. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[23]  D. Thorley-Lawson The suppression of Epstein-Barr virus infection in vitro occurs after infection but before transformation of the cell. , 1980, Journal of immunology.