Selection for position: The role of left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex in sequencing language

Patients with damage involving left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (left VLPFC) often show syntactic deficits. They also show exaggerated interference effects during a variety of non-syntactic tasks, including picture naming and working memory. Conceivably, both deficits could arise from inadequate biasing of competitive interactions during language production. To test this hypothesis, we manipulated "positional" interference during multi-word naming by priming one of the nouns in the same or different position. Experimental case studies of four left VLPFC patients revealed that two of the patients showed exaggerated positional interference, greater number of errors, including omissions during multi-word production, increased production difficulty when the order of nouns did not match the predominant English pattern, as well as impaired comprehension of non-canonical reversible sentences. These results suggest that these two patients had an impairment in "selection for position". Different from the other two, their lesions included a subregion of frontal cortex (BA 44/6) that has been shown in neuroimaging studies to play a role in sequencing.

[1]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Proactive Interference in a Semantic Short-Term Memory Deficit: Role of Semantic and Phonological Relatedness , 2007, Cortex.

[2]  Max Coltheart,et al.  The MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 1981 .

[3]  S. Bookheimer Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.

[4]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  Action comprehension in aphasia: linguistic and non-linguistic deficits and their lesion correlates , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  D. Caplan,et al.  Syntactic determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasia , 1985, Cognition.

[6]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Enhancement of MR Images Using Registration for Signal Averaging , 1998, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography.

[7]  S. Bookheimer,et al.  Form and Content Dissociating Syntax and Semantics in Sentence Comprehension , 1999, Neuron.

[8]  M. Schwartz,et al.  The word order problem in agrammatism I. Comprehension , 1980, Brain and Language.

[9]  B. Rossion,et al.  Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's Object Pictorial Set: The Role of Surface Detail in Basic-Level Object Recognition , 2004, Perception.

[10]  D. Caplan The Measurement of Chance Performance in Aphasia, with Specific Reference to the Comprehension of Semantically Reversible Passive Sentences: A Note on Issues Raised by Caramazza, Capitani, Rey, and Berndt (2001) and Drai, Grodzinsky, and Zurif (2001) , 2001, Brain and Language.

[11]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Lagrangian frame diffeomorphic image registration: Morphometric comparison of human and chimpanzee cortex , 2006, Medical Image Anal..

[12]  David Caplan,et al.  Effects of Syntactic Structure and Propositional Number on Patterns of Regional Cerebral Blood Flow , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  D. C. Howell,et al.  Comparing an Individual's Test Score Against Norms Derived from Small Samples , 1998 .

[14]  Jan Derrfuss,et al.  Cognitive control in the posterior frontolateral cortex: evidence from common activations in task coordination, interference control, and working memory , 2004, NeuroImage.

[15]  M. Arbib,et al.  Language within our grasp , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: Procedure and data , 1989, Brain and Language.

[17]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Consequences of an inhibition deficit for word production and comprehension: Evidence from the semantic blocking paradigm , 2008, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[18]  J. Jonides,et al.  Brain mechanisms of proactive interference in working memory , 2006, Neuroscience.

[19]  Rosaleen A. McCarthy,et al.  Evidence for a context-sensitive word retrieval disorder in a case of nonfluent aphasia , 2002, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[20]  Myrna F Schwartz,et al.  The word order problem in agrammatism II. Production , 1980, Brain and Language.

[21]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Semantic relatedness effects in conjoined noun phrase production: implications for the role of short-term memory , 2004, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[22]  J. A. Shafer,et al.  Understanding aphasia. , 1954, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

[23]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Lexical‐semantic retention and speech production:further evidence from normal and brain‐damaged participants for a phrasal scope of planning , 2004, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[24]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Semantic interference during blocked-cyclic naming: Evidence from aphasia , 2006 .

[25]  N. Cohen,et al.  Prefrontal regions play a predominant role in imposing an attentional 'set': evidence from fMRI. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension , 2005, NeuroImage.

[27]  Alice C. Roy,et al.  Encoding of human action in Broca's area. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  Irene P. Kan,et al.  Effect of name agreement on prefrontal activity during overt and covert picture naming , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[29]  A. Anwander,et al.  The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: Functional localization and structural connectivity , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  M. Farah,et al.  A unified account of cognitive impairments following frontal lobe damage: the role of working memory in complex, organized behavior. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  F. Dick,et al.  Language deficits, localization, and grammar: evidence for a distributive model of language breakdown in aphasic patients and neurologically intact individuals. , 2001, Psychological review.

[32]  F. Rösler,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by the Comprehension of Normal and Pseudo-word Sentences of Different Processing Demands: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[33]  A. Kertesz The Western Aphasia Battery , 1982 .

[34]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  On considerations of method and theory governing the use of clinical categories in neurolinguistics and cognitive neuropsychology: The case against agrammatism , 1985, Cognition.

[35]  Roel M. Willems,et al.  When language meets action: the neural integration of gesture and speech. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia , 1976, Brain and Language.

[37]  S. Bookheimer,et al.  Dissociating Neural Mechanisms of Temporal Sequencing and Processing Phonemes , 2003, Neuron.

[38]  C. Fiebach,et al.  Revisiting the role of Broca's area in sentence processing: Syntactic integration versus syntactic working memory , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[39]  R. Berndt,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Aphasic Sentence Production: Further Development and New Data , 2000, Brain and Language.

[40]  A. Meyer,et al.  Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[41]  K. Bock,et al.  From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft. , 1992, Psychological review.

[42]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Broca's Area and the Ventral Premotor Cortex in Language: Functional Differentiation and Specificity , 2006, Cortex.

[43]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  Linguistic prominence and Broca's area: The influence of animacy as a linearization principle , 2006, NeuroImage.

[44]  D. Caplan,et al.  Chapter 3. CT-Scan correlates of agrammatism , 1989 .

[45]  N. Dronkers,et al.  Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension , 2004, Cognition.

[46]  R. Mccarthy,et al.  Wobbly words: Refractory anomia with preserved semantics , 2000 .

[47]  Sarah E Williams,et al.  The influence of situational context on naming performance in aphasic syndromes , 1982, Brain and Language.

[48]  Elizabeth A. Hirshorn,et al.  Localizing interference during naming: Convergent neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence for the function of Broca's area , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Effects of frontal lobe damage on interference effects in working memory , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[50]  M. Brass,et al.  The role of the inferior frontal junction area in cognitive control , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[51]  Myrna F Schwartz,et al.  A new multiword naming deficit: Evidence and interpretation , 2002, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[52]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Hierarchical artificial grammar processing engages Broca's area , 2008, NeuroImage.