CasA mediates Cas3-catalyzed target degradation during CRISPR RNA-guided interference

Significance Bacteria use clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) together with CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins to defend themselves against viral infection. The CRISPR locus contains short segments acquired from viral genomes, and RNAs derived from these segments assemble with Cas proteins into programmable DNA-binding complexes that target DNA molecules complementary to the guide RNA for cleavage. In type I CRISPR-Cas systems, the CRISPR-associated complex for antiviral defense (Cascade) binds to target DNA sequences and then recruits the Cas3 enzyme to repeatedly cleave the bound DNA. In this study, we show how Cascade positions both the DNA and Cas3 to ensure DNA cleavage. In bacteria, the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)–associated (Cas) DNA-targeting complex Cascade (CRISPR-associated complex for antiviral defense) uses CRISPR RNA (crRNA) guides to bind complementary DNA targets at sites adjacent to a trinucleotide signature sequence called the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM). The Cascade complex then recruits Cas3, a nuclease-helicase that catalyzes unwinding and cleavage of foreign double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) bearing a sequence matching that of the crRNA. Cascade comprises the CasA–E proteins and one crRNA, forming a structure that binds and unwinds dsDNA to form an R loop in which the target strand of the DNA base pairs with the 32-nt RNA guide sequence. Single-particle electron microscopy reconstructions of dsDNA-bound Cascade with and without Cas3 reveal that Cascade positions the PAM-proximal end of the DNA duplex at the CasA subunit and near the site of Cas3 association. The finding that the DNA target and Cas3 colocalize with CasA implicates this subunit in a key target-validation step during DNA interference. We show biochemically that base pairing of the PAM region is unnecessary for target binding but critical for Cas3-mediated degradation. In addition, the L1 loop of CasA, previously implicated in PAM recognition, is essential for Cas3 activation following target binding by Cascade. Together, these data show that the CasA subunit of Cascade functions as an essential partner of Cas3 by recognizing DNA target sites and positioning Cas3 adjacent to the PAM to ensure cleavage.

[1]  R. Terns,et al.  CRISPR-based technologies: prokaryotic defense weapons repurposed. , 2014, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[2]  Wen Jiang,et al.  EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. , 2007, Journal of structural biology.

[3]  R. Barrangou,et al.  CRISPR Provides Acquired Resistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes , 2007, Science.

[4]  J. Doudna,et al.  RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea , 2012, Nature.

[5]  Shirley Graham,et al.  Structure of the CRISPR Interference Complex CSM Reveals Key Similarities with Cascade , 2013, Molecular cell.

[6]  B. Graveley,et al.  RNA-Guided RNA Cleavage by a CRISPR RNA-Cas Protein Complex , 2009, Cell.

[7]  Albert J R Heck,et al.  Structure and activity of the RNA-targeting Type III-B CRISPR-Cas complex of Thermus thermophilus. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[8]  Feng Zhang,et al.  Crystal Structure of Cas9 in Complex with Guide RNA and Target DNA , 2014, Cell.

[9]  Chao Yang,et al.  SPARX, a new environment for Cryo-EM image processing. , 2007, Journal of structural biology.

[10]  Albert J R Heck,et al.  Structural basis for CRISPR RNA-guided DNA recognition by Cascade , 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[11]  Michael S. Spilman,et al.  Structure of an RNA silencing complex of the CRISPR-Cas immune system. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[12]  W Chiu,et al.  EMAN: semiautomated software for high-resolution single-particle reconstructions. , 1999, Journal of structural biology.

[13]  R. Barrangou,et al.  In vitro reconstitution of Cascade‐mediated CRISPR immunity in Streptococcus thermophilus , 2013, The EMBO journal.

[14]  Christopher Irving,et al.  Appion: an integrated, database-driven pipeline to facilitate EM image processing. , 2009, Journal of structural biology.

[15]  Anchi Cheng,et al.  Automated molecular microscopy: the new Leginon system. , 2005, Journal of structural biology.

[16]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server , 2009, Nature Protocols.

[17]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[18]  Scott Bailey,et al.  In Vitro Reconstitution of an Escherichia coli RNA-guided Immune System Reveals Unidirectional, ATP-dependent Degradation of DNA Target* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  Konstantin Severinov,et al.  CRISPR immunity relies on the consecutive binding and degradation of negatively supercoiled invader DNA by Cascade and Cas3. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[20]  J. García-Martínez,et al.  Short motif sequences determine the targets of the prokaryotic CRISPR defence system. , 2009, Microbiology.

[21]  Thomas D. Goddard,et al.  Quantitative analysis of cryo-EM density map segmentation by watershed and scale-space filtering, and fitting of structures by alignment to regions. , 2010, Journal of structural biology.

[22]  Stan J. J. Brouns,et al.  Small CRISPR RNAs Guide Antiviral Defense in Prokaryotes , 2008, Science.

[23]  Joshua R. Elmore,et al.  Essential features and rational design of CRISPR RNAs that function with the Cas RAMP module complex to cleave RNAs. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[24]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Structures of the RNA-guided surveillance complex from a bacterial immune system , 2011, Nature.

[25]  Clinton S Potter,et al.  ACE: automated CTF estimation. , 2005, Ultramicroscopy.

[26]  Konstantin Severinov,et al.  Interference by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) RNA is governed by a seed sequence , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  J. García-Martínez,et al.  Intervening Sequences of Regularly Spaced Prokaryotic Repeats Derive from Foreign Genetic Elements , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[28]  J M Carazo,et al.  XMIPP: a new generation of an open-source image processing package for electron microscopy. , 2004, Journal of structural biology.

[29]  R. Barrangou,et al.  Cas9–crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  M van Heel,et al.  A new generation of the IMAGIC image processing system. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[31]  Philippe Horvath,et al.  The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA , 2010, Nature.

[32]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Structures of Cas9 Endonucleases Reveal RNA-Mediated Conformational Activation , 2014, Science.

[33]  J. Doudna,et al.  A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity , 2012, Science.

[34]  A M Roseman,et al.  FindEM--a fast, efficient program for automatic selection of particles from electron micrographs. , 2004, Journal of structural biology.

[35]  Stan J. J. Brouns,et al.  Evolution and classification of the CRISPR–Cas systems , 2011, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[36]  Dipali G. Sashital,et al.  Mechanism of foreign DNA selection in a bacterial adaptive immune system. , 2012, Molecular cell.