Analysis of landslide hazard area in Ludian earthquake based on Random Forests

With the development of machine learning theory, more and more algorithms are evaluated for seismic landslides. After the Ludian earthquake, the research team combine with the special geological structure in Ludian area and the seismic filed exploration results, selecting SLOPE(PODU); River distance(HL); Fault distance(DC); Seismic Intensity(LD) and Digital Elevation Model(DEM), the normalized difference vegetation index(NDVI) which based on remote sensing images as evaluation factors. But the relationships among these factors are fuzzy, there also exists heavy noise and high-dimensional, we introduce the random forest algorithm to tolerate these difficulties and get the evaluation result of Ludian landslide areas, in order to verify the accuracy of the result, using the ROC graphs for the result evaluation standard, AUC covers an area of 0.918, meanwhile, the random forest’s generalization error rate decreases with the increase of the classification tree to the ideal 0.08 by using Out Of Bag(OOB) Estimation. Studying the final landslides inversion results, paper comes to a statistical conclusion that near 80% of the whole landslides and dilapidations are in areas with high susceptibility and moderate susceptibility, showing the forecast results are reasonable and adopted.

[1]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[2]  H. A. Nefeslioglu,et al.  Susceptibility assessments of shallow earthflows triggered by heavy rainfall at three catchments by logistic regression analyses , 2005 .

[3]  Fang Kuang-nana,et al.  A Review of Technologies on Random Forests , 2011 .

[4]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[5]  C. Chung,et al.  Predicting landslides for risk analysis — Spatial models tested by a cross-validation technique , 2008 .

[6]  Li Zhong-sheng,et al.  The State of the Art of the Research on Seismic Landslide Hazard at Home and abroad , 2003 .

[7]  Saro Lee,et al.  Landslide susceptibility mapping by correlation between topography and geological structure: the Janghung area, Korea , 2002 .

[8]  Alberto Carrara,et al.  Multivariate models for landslide hazard evaluation , 1983 .

[9]  David H. Wolpert,et al.  An Efficient Method To Estimate Bagging's Generalization Error , 1999, Machine Learning.

[10]  Nicola Casagli,et al.  Analysis of building deformation in landslide area using multisensor PSInSAR™ technique , 2014, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[11]  Pradhan Biswajeet,et al.  Utilization of Optical Remote Sensing Data and GIS Tools for Regional Landslide Hazard Analysis Using an Artificial Neural Network Model , 2007 .

[12]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[13]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .