Influence of Internal Structural Parameters on the Inner Flow and Outer Spray Characteristics for Feedback-Free Fluidic Oscillator

Feedback-free fluidic oscillators, relying on the interaction of jets to oscillate, have a wide range of operation frequencies and no moving parts, which is promising for future applications. In this paper, the sweep angle, oscillation frequency, and volume flow rate of the feedback-free fluidic oscillator with a cavity width of 4.6 mm were measured experimentally, and the sweeping mechanism was analyzed based on the internal flow simulation. The influence of the impact angle, cavity exit width, and shoulder radius on the internal flow and external spray characteristics was analyzed by the numerical method. The results show that the sweep angle and oscillation frequency are affected throughout the increase in impact angle from 80° to 120°. However, only when the SR is greater than 0.88 mm does the internal flow and spray state change significantly. The volume flow rate is mainly affected by the cavity exit width and increases linearly from 5.3 mL/s to 9.3 mL/s as the width increases from 0.45 mm to 0.85 mm. It can be surmised that the sweep angle is approximately linear with the distance between the hit point and the impact cavity centerline.

[1]  Zhijun Wu,et al.  Study on the Spray Characteristics and Oscillation Mechanism of a Feedback-Free Internal Impinging Nozzle , 2021, Flow, Turbulence and Combustion.

[2]  Kwang‐Yong Kim,et al.  Flow control using fluidic oscillators on an airfoil with a flap , 2021 .

[3]  Mehmet N. Tomac,et al.  Fluidic Oscillator with Variable Sweep and Inclination Angles , 2020 .

[4]  Ajinkya V. Pandit,et al.  Fluidic Oscillator as a Continuous Crystallizer: Feasibility Evaluation , 2020, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.

[5]  Mehmet N. Tomac,et al.  Oscillation characteristics of mutually impinging dual jets in a mixing chamber , 2018, Physics of Fluids.

[6]  P. Morris,et al.  Flow-Separation Control Using Sweeping Jet Actuator , 2018, AIAA Journal.

[7]  A. Glezer,et al.  Effects of manufacturing parameters on performance of fluidic oscillators for aerodynamic flow control , 2018, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering.

[8]  Frieder Reichenzer,et al.  Influence of Geometry on a Feedback-Free Fluidic Oscillator with Nonoutlet Facing Jets , 2018, AIAA Journal.

[9]  Marlyn Y. Andino,et al.  Flight Test of an Active Flow Control Enhanced Vertical Tail , 2018, AIAA Journal.

[10]  Li-jun Yang,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulation of a nanoscale feedback-free fluidic oscillator , 2017 .

[11]  J. Gregory,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Sweeping Jet Film Cooling , 2017 .

[12]  M. Koklu Effect of a Coanda Extension on the Performance of a Sweeping-Jet Actuator , 2016 .

[13]  Mehmet N. Tomac,et al.  Internal jet interactions in a fluidic oscillator at low flow rate , 2014 .

[14]  J. M. Bergadà,et al.  Experimental study of the internal flow structures inside a fluidic oscillator , 2013 .

[15]  Hai‐feng Liu,et al.  Experimental study of planar opposed jets with acoustic excitation , 2013 .

[16]  S. Raghu Fluidic oscillators for flow control , 2013, Experiments in Fluids.

[17]  Louis N. Cattafesta,et al.  Actuators for Active Flow Control , 2011 .

[18]  James W. Gregory,et al.  Visualization of jet mixing in a fluidic oscillator , 2005, J. Vis..

[19]  G Raman,et al.  Innovative actuators for active flow and noise control , 2002 .

[20]  Zongjie Hu,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL STUDIES ON SPRAY CHARACTERISTICS OF AN INTERNAL OSCILLATING NOZZLE , 2019, Atomization and Sprays.

[21]  Mehmet N. Tomac,et al.  Internal Flow Physics of a Fluidic Oscillator in the Transition Regime , 2016 .

[22]  S. Heister,et al.  COMPUTATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF JET INTERACTION FLUIDIC INJECTORS , 2011 .