Effect of an Online Weight Management Program Integrated With Population Health Management on Weight Change: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance Online programs may help with weight loss but have not been widely implemented in routine primary care. Objective To compare the effectiveness of a combined intervention, including an online weight management program plus population health management, with the online program only and with usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants Cluster randomized trial with enrollment from July 19, 2016, through August 10, 2017, at 15 primary care practices in the US. Eligible participants had a scheduled primary care visit and were aged 20 to 70 years, had a body mass index between 27 and less than 40, and had a diagnosis of hypertension or type 2 diabetes. Follow-up ended on May 8, 2019. Interventions Participants in the usual care group (n = 326) were mailed general information about weight management. Participants in the online program only group (n = 216) and the combined intervention group (n = 298) were registered for the online program. The participants in the combined intervention group also received weight-related population health management, which included additional support from nonclinical staff who monitored their progress in the online program and conducted periodic outreach. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was weight change at 12 months based on measured weights recorded in the electronic health record. Weight change at 18 months was a secondary outcome. Results Among the 840 participants who enrolled (mean age, 59.3 years [SD, 8.6 years]; 60% female; 76.8% White), 732 (87.1%) had a recorded weight at 12 months and the missing weights for the remaining participants were imputed. There was a significant difference in weight change at 12 months by group with a mean weight change of -1.2 kg (95% CI, -2.1 to -0.3 kg) in the usual care group, -1.9 kg (95% CI, -2.6 to -1.1 kg) in the online program only group, and -3.1 kg (95% CI, -3.7 to -2.5 kg) in the combined intervention group (P < .001). The difference in weight change between the combined intervention group and the usual care group was -1.9 kg (97.5% CI, -2.9 to -0.9 kg; P < .001) and the difference between the combined intervention group and the online program only group was -1.2 kg (95% CI, -2.2 to -0.3 kg; P = .01). At 18 months, the mean weight change was -1.9 kg (95% CI, -2.8 to -1.0 kg) in the usual care group, -1.1 kg (95% CI, -2.0 to -0.3 kg) in the online program only group, and -2.8 kg (95% CI, -3.5 to -2.0 kg) in the combined intervention group (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance Among primary care patients with overweight or obesity and hypertension or type 2 diabetes, combining population health management with an online program resulted in a small but statistically significant greater weight loss at 12 months compared with usual care or the online program only. Further research is needed to understand the generalizability, scalability, and durability of these findings. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02656693.

[1]  L. Aronne,et al.  Integrating an online weight management program with population health management in primary care: Design, methods, and baseline data from the PROPS randomized controlled trial (partnerships for reducing overweight and obesity with patient-centered strategies). , 2020, Contemporary clinical trials.

[2]  J. Block,et al.  Primary Care Patients’ and Providers’ Perspectives about an Online Weight Management Program: a Qualitative Study , 2019, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[3]  A. Beleigoli,et al.  Web-Based Digital Health Interventions for Weight Loss and Lifestyle Habit Changes in Overweight and Obese Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2019, Journal of medical Internet research.

[4]  G. Castelnuovo,et al.  Web-Based Interventions for Weight Loss or Weight Loss Maintenance in Overweight and Obese People: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[5]  J. Raftery,et al.  An internet-based intervention with brief nurse support to manage obesity in primary care (POWeR+): a pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. , 2016, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[6]  Kenneth J. Smith,et al.  Cost effectiveness of an internet-delivered lifestyle intervention in primary care patients with high cardiovascular risk. , 2016, Preventive medicine.

[7]  S. Bleich,et al.  Efficacy of commercial weight-loss programs: an updated systematic review. , 2015, Annals of internal medicine.

[8]  Robert F Kushner,et al.  2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  S. Michie,et al.  Does Brief Telephone Support Improve Engagement With a Web-Based Weight Management Intervention? Randomized Controlled Trial , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[10]  Harathi Yandrapu,et al.  Implementing Panel Management for Hypertension in a Low-Income, Urban, Primary Care Setting , 2014, Journal of primary care & community health.

[11]  T. Wadden,et al.  Managing obesity in primary care practice: an overview with perspective from the POWER-UP study , 2013, International Journal of Obesity.

[12]  M. Conroy,et al.  Use of the internet in the treatment of obesity and prevention of type 2 diabetes in primary care , 2012, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

[13]  Thomas A Louis,et al.  Comparative effectiveness of weight-loss interventions in clinical practice. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Ellen H. Chen,et al.  Improving population health through team-based panel management: comment on "Electronic medical record reminders and panel management to improve primary care of elderly patients". , 2011, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  Clare E Collins,et al.  Dropout, Nonusage Attrition, and Pretreatment Predictors of Nonusage Attrition in a Commercial Web-Based Weight Loss Program , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[16]  M. Neve,et al.  Effectiveness of web‐based interventions in achieving weight loss and weight loss maintenance in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review with meta‐analysis , 2010, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[17]  Jun Ma,et al.  Adult Obesity and Office‐based Quality of Care in the United States , 2009, Obesity.

[18]  Joe Kimura,et al.  Population management, systems-based practice, and planned chronic illness care: integrating disease management competencies into primary care to improve composite diabetes quality measures. , 2008, Disease management : DM.

[19]  D. McAlpine,et al.  Trends in Obesity-Related Counseling in Primary Care: 1995–2004 , 2007, Medical care.

[20]  Nicole L. Nollen,et al.  Weight-related perceptions among patients and physicians , 2006, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[21]  R. Kolotkin,et al.  Psychometric evaluation of the impact of weight on quality of life-lite questionnaire (IWQOL-Lite) in a community sample , 2002, Quality of Life Research.

[22]  W. Willett,et al.  PrimeScreen, a brief dietary screening tool: reproducibility and comparability with both a longer food frequency questionnaire and biomarkers , 2001, Public Health Nutrition.

[23]  D. Schoenfeld,et al.  National patterns of physician activities related to obesity management. , 2000, Archives of family medicine.

[24]  M Sullivan,et al.  The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[25]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[26]  S. J. Franco,et al.  Health, United States, 2018 , 2019 .

[27]  David M. Levine,et al.  Technology-Assisted Weight Loss Interventions in Primary Care: A Systematic Review , 2015, Journal of general internal medicine.

[28]  Michael D. Jensen,et al.  Reprint: 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS Guideline for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. , 2013, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA.

[29]  Esther B Neuwirth,et al.  Understanding panel management: a comparative study of an emerging approach to population care. , 2007, The Permanente Journal.

[30]  Leonard H. Epstein,et al.  Overweight, obesity, and health risk. , 2000, Archives of internal medicine.

[31]  R S Paffenbarger,et al.  Measurement of physical activity to assess health effects in free-living populations. , 1993, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.