Antibiotic Cement Spacer and Induced Membrane Bone Grafting in Open Fractures with Bone Loss: A Case Series

Background: Open fractures are a difficult entity, often complicated by infection and nonunion. Bone loss in such fractures adds to the complexity. Conventional techniques of bone defect management are mainly directed toward fracture union but not against preventing infection or joint stiffness. In this case series, we evaluated Masquelet's technique for management of open fractures with bone loss. Materials and Methods: Twenty seven open fractures with bone defect, which presented within 3 days of trauma were planned for treatment by Masquelet's technique. Followup ranged from 21 to 60 months. Results: Average length of bone defect was 6 cm. Radiological union was obtained at a mean of 280 days since first stage of surgery. Time for union was not related to the size of defect. Union was faster in metaphyseal region (265.6 ± 38.8 days) as compared to diaphysis (300.9 ± 58.6 days). No patient had residual infection after stage 1. All the patients were able to mobilize with full weight bearing after radiological union with a satisfactory range of motion of adjacent joints. Conclusion: This technique can be routinely applied in compound fractures with bone loss with good results. Chances of infection are reduced using antibiotic cement spacer as an adjunct to thorough debridement. Induced biomembrane revascularizes the graft. Union can be expected in most of the cases, however, long time to union is a limitation. Technique is cost-effective and does not require special training or instrumentation. Although it is a two-stage surgery, requirement of multiple surgeries, as may be needed in conventional methods, is avoided.

[1]  I. Pluvy,et al.  Functional and radiographic evaluation of the treatment of traumatic bone loss of the hand using the Masquelet technique. , 2016, Hand surgery & rehabilitation.

[2]  F. Luo,et al.  Induced membrane technique for the treatment of bone defects due to post-traumatic osteomyelitis , 2016, Bone & joint research.

[3]  W. Walsh,et al.  The Masquelet Technique for Membrane Induction and the Healing of Ovine Critical Sized Segmental Defects , 2014, PloS one.

[4]  M. Bumbasirevic,et al.  Free vascularised fibular grafts in orthopaedics , 2014, International Orthopaedics.

[5]  Hannu-Ville Leskelä,et al.  The mechanism of action of induced membranes in bone repair. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  K. Chong,et al.  Induced membranes--a staged technique of bone-grafting for segmental bone loss: surgical technique. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  L. Obert,et al.  Pertes de substance osseuse à la main et au poignet traitées en urgence par technique de la membrane induite (technique de Masquelet) , 2010 .

[8]  P. Cronier,et al.  Two-stage reconstruction of post-traumatic segmental tibia bone loss with nailing. , 2010, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[9]  Y. Tropet,et al.  [Use of the induced membrane technique for the treatment of bone defects in the hand or wrist, in emergency]. , 2010, Chirurgie de la main.

[10]  A. Masquelet,et al.  The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction of long bone defects. , 2010, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[11]  R. Brand,et al.  Lower limb deformity due to failed trauma treatment corrected with the Ilizarov technique , 2009, Acta Orthopaedica.

[12]  J. Kelm,et al.  Elution of gentamicin and vancomycin from polymethylmethacrylate beads and hip spacers in vivo , 2009, Acta orthopaedica.

[13]  Marc F Swiontkowski,et al.  Treatment principles in the management of open fractures , 2008, Indian journal of orthopaedics.

[14]  R. Marcus,et al.  Management of open fractures and subsequent complications. , 2007, Instructional course lectures.

[15]  A C Masquelet,et al.  Induced membranes secrete growth factors including vascular and osteoinductive factors and could stimulate bone regeneration , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[16]  M. Pirela-Cruz,et al.  Management of Posttraumatic Segmental Bone Defects , 2004, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[17]  S. Lepreux,et al.  Behaviour of cancellous bone graft placed in induced membranes. , 2002, British journal of plastic surgery.

[18]  R. Gustilo,et al.  JSBS classics. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones. Retrospective and prospective analyses. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  A. Minami,et al.  Vascularised fibular grafts , 2000 .

[20]  A. Minami,et al.  Vascularised fibular grafts. An experience of 102 patients. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  D. Paley,et al.  Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  R. Gustilo,et al.  Classification of type III (severe) open fractures relative to treatment and results. , 1987, Orthopedics.