Supervised mineral exploration targeting and the challenges with the selection of deposit and non-deposit sites thereof

Abstract Selection of non-deposit sites is a challenging issue affecting the application of supervised algorithms for modeling mineral exploration targets. For this, equal number of deposit and non-deposit sites has been widely applied for training purposes. In this paper, we investigated the effect of changes in the number of non-deposit sites on the effectiveness of exploration targeting models while the number of deposit sites is constant. The results obtained demonstrated that exploration targeting models are affected by the ratio of non-deposit and deposit sites. Thus, balancing between the number of deposit and non-deposit sites is an efficient way to produce more-reliable exploration targets when supervised algorithms are applied for modeling. The idea of this research came from the fact that mineralization is a rare event, and therefore, in a region of interest number of non-deposit sites is much more than that of deposit events. To illustrate the procedure proposed, we used an exploration dataset of porphyry Cu mineralization in Chahargonbad area, SE Iran. A sequence application of self-organizing map and multilayer perceptron neural network algorithm was applied to better illustration of the changing effects of the number of non-deposit sites on the ensuing exploration targeting models.

[1]  R. Zuo.  Geodata Science-Based Mineral Prospectivity Mapping: A Review , 2020, Natural Resources Research.

[2]  Mark J. Mihalasky,et al.  Lithodiversity and Its Spatial Association with Metallic Mineral Sites, Great Basin of Nevada , 2001 .

[3]  Carlos Roberto de Souza Filho,et al.  Modeling of Cu-Au prospectivity in the Carajás mineral province (Brazil) through machine learning: Dealing with imbalanced training data , 2020 .

[4]  D. Singer,et al.  Application of a feedforward neural network in the search for Kuroko deposits in the Hokuroku district, Japan , 1996 .

[5]  Eric C. Grunsky,et al.  Predictive lithological mapping of Canada's North using Random Forest classification applied to geophysical and geochemical data , 2015, Comput. Geosci..

[6]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Neural networks for pattern recognition , 1995 .

[7]  Esa Alhoniemi,et al.  Clustering of the self-organizing map , 2000, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst..

[8]  E. Carranza,et al.  Selection of coherent deposit-type locations and their application in data-driven mineral prospectivity mapping , 2008 .

[9]  M. Abedi,et al.  Weighted Photolineaments Factor (WPF): An Enhanced Method to Generate a Predictive Structural Evidential Map with Low Uncertainty, a Case Study in Chahargonbad Area, Iran , 2020, Natural Resources Research.

[10]  Regional magnetic lithologies and structures as controls on porphyry copper deposits: evidence from Iran , 2016 .

[11]  Zahra Yazdi,et al.  Analysis and modeling of geospatial datasets for porphyry copper prospectivity mapping in Chahargonbad area, Central Iran , 2015, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[12]  Misac N. Nabighian,et al.  Additional comments on the analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section , 1974 .

[13]  Mahyar Yousefi,et al.  Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Neuro-Fuzzy Prospectivity Analysis Using Continuously Weighted Spatial Exploration Data , 2018, Natural Resources Research.

[14]  Maysam Abedi,et al.  Integration of various geophysical data with geological and geochemical data to determine additional drilling for copper exploration , 2012 .

[15]  M. Yousefi,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on spatial modelling and analysis of ore-forming processes in mineral exploration targeting , 2020 .

[16]  Renguang Zuo,et al.  GIS-based rare events logistic regression for mineral prospectivity mapping , 2018, Comput. Geosci..

[17]  Yi-Chung Hu,et al.  Optimization Theory, Methods, and Applications in Engineering 2014 , 2012 .

[18]  R. Zuo,et al.  Effects of Random Negative Training Samples on Mineral Prospectivity Mapping , 2020, Natural Resources Research.

[19]  Abbas Bahroudi,et al.  Support vector machine for multi-classification of mineral prospectivity areas , 2012, Comput. Geosci..

[20]  M. Yousefi,et al.  Introduction to the special issue: GIS-based mineral potential targeting , 2017 .

[21]  A. Bhattacharya,et al.  Random Forest-Based Prospectivity Modelling of Greenfield Terrains Using Sparse Deposit Data: An Example from the Tanami Region, Western Australia , 2017, Natural Resources Research.

[22]  Alok Porwal,et al.  A Hybrid Neuro-Fuzzy Model for Mineral Potential Mapping , 2004 .

[23]  Emmanuel John M. Carranza,et al.  Data-Driven Index Overlay and Boolean Logic Mineral Prospectivity Modeling in Greenfields Exploration , 2016, Natural Resources Research.

[24]  Emmanuel John M. Carranza,et al.  Geometric average of spatial evidence data layers: A GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making approach to mineral prospectivity mapping , 2015, Comput. Geosci..

[25]  W. Liu,et al.  GIS-based mineral prospectivity mapping using machine learning methods: A case study from Tongling ore district, eastern China , 2019, Ore Geology Reviews.

[26]  Maysam Abedi,et al.  Clustering of mineral prospectivity area as an unsupervised classification approach to explore copper deposit , 2013, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[27]  G. Bonham-Carter.  Geographic Information Systems for Geoscientists: Modelling with GIS , 1995 .

[28]  A. Hezarkhani,et al.  Application of an ordinary kriging–artificial neural network for elemental distribution in Kahang porphyry deposit, Central Iran , 2020, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[29]  Adriana Giret,et al.  A New Optimization Algorithm Based on Search and Rescue Operations , 2019, Mathematical Problems in Engineering.

[30]  Aijun An,et al.  Application of ant colony algorithm to geochemical anomaly detection , 2016 .

[31]  F. Molnár,et al.  Unsupervised clustering and empirical fuzzy memberships for mineral prospectivity modelling , 2019, Ore Geology Reviews.

[32]  A. Hezarkhani,et al.  Application of support vector machines for copper potential mapping in Kerman region, Iran , 2017 .

[33]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[34]  E. Carranza,et al.  Data-Driven Predictive Modeling of Mineral Prospectivity Using Random Forests: A Case Study in Catanduanes Island (Philippines) , 2016, Natural Resources Research.

[35]  R. Zuo,et al.  Mapping mineral prospectivity for Cu polymetallic mineralization in southwest Fujian Province, China , 2016 .

[36]  Tongfei Li,et al.  Prospectivity Mapping for Tungsten Polymetallic Mineral Resources, Nanling Metallogenic Belt, South China: Use of Random Forest Algorithm from a Perspective of Data Imbalance , 2019, Natural Resources Research.

[37]  Jian Wang,et al.  Mapping Mineral Prospectivity via Semi-supervised Random Forest , 2019, Natural Resources Research.

[38]  Renguang Zuo,et al.  Support vector machine: A tool for mapping mineral prospectivity , 2011, Comput. Geosci..

[39]  M. J. Mihalasky.  Mineral potential modelling of gold and silver mineralization in the Nevada Great Basin - a GIS-based analysis using weights of evidence , 2001 .

[40]  V. Nykänen,et al.  Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) as validation tool for prospectivity models — A magmatic Ni–Cu case study from the Central Lapland Greenstone Belt, Northern Finland , 2015 .

[41]  J. Harris,et al.  Application of GIS Processing Techniques for Producing Mineral Prospectivity Maps—A Case Study: Mesothermal Au in the Swayze Greenstone Belt, Ontario, Canada , 2001 .

[42]  M. Yousefi.  Recognition of an enhanced multi-element geochemical signature of porphyry copper deposits for vectoring into mineralized zones and delimiting exploration targets in Jiroft area, SE Iran , 2017 .

[43]  Samuel Kaski,et al.  Self organization of a massive document collection , 2000, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst..

[44]  Emmanuel John M. Carranza,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks for Mineral-Potential Mapping: A Case Study from Aravalli Province, Western India , 2003 .

[45]  V. Nykänen.  Radial Basis Functional Link Nets Used as a Prospectivity Mapping Tool for Orogenic Gold Deposits Within the Central Lapland Greenstone Belt, Northern Fennoscandian Shield , 2008 .

[46]  J. Harris,et al.  Data- and knowledge-driven mineral prospectivity maps for Canada's North , 2015 .

[47]  D. Wright,et al.  Mineral Potential Modelling for the Greater Nahanni Ecosystem Using GIS Based Analytical Methods , 2008 .

[48]  G. Raines,et al.  Assessment of Exploration Bias in Data-Driven Predictive Models and the Estimation of Undiscovered Resources , 2007 .

[49]  R. Zuo,et al.  Effects of misclassification costs on mapping mineral prospectivity , 2017 .

[50]  P. Afzal,et al.  Delineation of podiform-type chromite mineralization using geochemical mineralization prospectivity index and staged factor analysis in Balvard area (SE Iran) , 2019 .

[51]  J. Hronsky.  Self-Organized Critical Systems and Ore Formation: The Key to Spatial Targeting?* , 2011 .

[52]  Mahyar Yousefi,et al.  Prediction-area (P-A) plot and C-A fractal analysis to classify and evaluate evidential maps for mineral prospectivity modeling , 2015, Comput. Geosci..

[53]  M. Yousefi,et al.  Data-driven logistic-based weighting of geochemical and geological evidence layers in mineral prospectivity mapping , 2016 .

[54]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  The self-organizing map , 1990, Neurocomputing.

[55]  E. Carranza.  Geochemical Anomaly and Mineral Prospectivity Mapping in Gis , 2012 .

[56]  Q. Cheng,et al.  The separation of geochemical anomalies from background by fractal methods , 1994 .

[57]  J. Shahabpour.  Post-mineralization breccia dike from the Sar Cheshmeh porphyry copper deposit, Kerman, Iran , 1994 .

[58]  M. Yousefi,et al.  Exploration information systems – A proposal for the future use of GIS in mineral exploration targeting , 2019, Ore Geology Reviews.

[59]  P. Afzal,et al.  Application of Fractal Modelling for Cu Mineralisation Reconnaissance by ASTER Multispectral and Stream Sediment Data in Khoshname Area, NW Iran , 2015, Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing.

[60]  Guocheng Pan,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Favorability Mappings by Weights of Evidence, Probabilistic Neural Networks, Discriminant Analysis, and Logistic Regression , 2003 .

[61]  Tom Gedeon,et al.  Artificial neural networks: A new method for mineral prospectivity mapping , 2000 .

[62]  R. Zuo,et al.  A comparative study of fuzzy weights of evidence and random forests for mapping mineral prospectivity for skarn-type Fe deposits in the southwestern Fujian metallogenic belt, China , 2016, Science China Earth Sciences.

[63]  D. Groves,et al.  Science of targeting: definition, strategies, targeting and performance measurement , 2008 .