The instability of downside risk measures

We study the feasibility and noise sensitivity of portfolio optimization under some downside risk measures (value-at-risk, expected shortfall, and semivariance) when they are estimated by fitting a parametric distribution on a finite sample of asset returns. We find that the existence of the optimum is a probabilistic issue, depending on the particular random sample, in all three cases. At a critical combination of the parameters of these problems we find an algorithmic phase transition, separating the phase where the optimization is feasible from the one where it is not. This transition is similar to the one discovered earlier for expected shortfall based on historical time series. We employ the replica method to compute the phase diagram, as well as to obtain the critical exponent of the estimation error that diverges at the critical point. The analytical results are corroborated by Monte Carlo simulations.

[1]  I. Kondor,et al.  Feasibility of Portfolio Optimization under Coherent Risk Measures , 2008, 0803.2283.

[2]  Imre Kondor,et al.  Noise sensitivity of portfolio selection in constant conditional correlation GARCH models , 2007 .

[3]  Marc Mézard,et al.  Risk minimization through portfolio replication , 2006, physics/0608035.

[4]  I. Kondor,et al.  Noise sensitivity of portfolio selection under various risk measures , 2006, physics/0611027.

[5]  Marc Mézard,et al.  On the feasibility of portfolio optimization under expected shortfall , 2006, physics/0606015.

[6]  Olivier Ledoit,et al.  A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices , 2004 .

[7]  Z. Burda,et al.  Signal and Noise in Correlation Matrix , 2003, cond-mat/0305627.

[8]  Imre Kondor,et al.  Estimated correlation matrices and portfolio optimization , 2003, cond-mat/0305475.

[9]  Olivier Ledoit,et al.  Improved estimation of the covariance matrix of stock returns with an application to portfolio selection , 2003 .

[10]  Olivier Ledoit,et al.  Honey, I Shrunk the Sample Covariance Matrix , 2003 .

[11]  Z. Burda,et al.  Is Econophysics a Solid Science , 2003, cond-mat/0301096.

[12]  I. Kondor,et al.  Noisy Covariance Matrices and Portfolio Optimization II , 2002, cond-mat/0205119.

[13]  I. Kondor,et al.  Noisy covariance matrices and portfolio optimization , 2001, cond-mat/0111503.

[14]  V. Plerou,et al.  Random matrix approach to cross correlations in financial data. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  D. Tasche,et al.  Expected Shortfall: a natural coherent alternative to Value at Risk , 2001, cond-mat/0105191.

[16]  C. Acerbi,et al.  Expected Shortfall as a Tool for Financial Risk Management , 2001, cond-mat/0102304.

[17]  J. Bouchaud,et al.  RANDOM MATRIX THEORY AND FINANCIAL CORRELATIONS , 2000 .

[18]  R. Rockafellar,et al.  Optimization of conditional value-at risk , 2000 .

[19]  Philippe Artzner,et al.  Coherent Measures of Risk , 1999 .

[20]  V. Plerou,et al.  Universal and Nonuniversal Properties of Cross Correlations in Financial Time Series , 1999, cond-mat/9902283.

[21]  J. Bouchaud,et al.  Noise Dressing of Financial Correlation Matrices , 1998, cond-mat/9810255.

[22]  Byung Ha Lim,et al.  A Minimax Portfolio Selection Rule with Linear Programming Solution , 1998 .

[23]  M. Mézard,et al.  Spin Glass Theory and Beyond , 1987 .

[24]  A. Stuart,et al.  Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments , 1959 .