Microtensile bond strength of sealant and adhesive systems applied to occlusal primary enamel.

PURPOSE To compare the microtensile bond strength (muTBS) of a self-etch adhesive system (OptiBond Solo Self-Etch Adhesive System), two total etch adhesive system (OptiBond FL; OptiBond Solo), and a conventional sealant (Clinpro) applied to the occlusal surface of primary molars under saliva contamination. METHODS Sealant and adhesive systems were applied under manufacturers' specifications with or without previous saliva contamination. After storage in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours, the specimens were longitudinally sectioned perpendicularly to the adhesive interface to obtain sticks (0.6 mm2) which were tested under a tensile load of 0.5 mm/minute. The bond failure modes were evaluated via scanning electron microscope. Repeated measures ANOVA followed by multiple comparisons using Bonferroni's technique was used to evaluate the effects of adhesive system and saliva contamination. The pre-test debonded specimens were included in the computation of the pTBS of each tooth. RESULTS No association between failure mode and the values of muTBS was observed (P = 0.3605). The majority of fractures were of mixed type; no cohesive failure of enamel or composite resin was observed. No significant effect of saliva contamination was detected (P = 0.2044). OptiBond FL and Clinpro had equivalent average muTBS (34.5 +/- 2.2 MPa and 45.1 +/- 3.2 MPa, respectively) which are significantly higher than the corresponding average muTBS for OptiBond Solo Plus and OptiBond Solo SE which may also be considered equivalent (19.1 +/- 2.3 MPa and 9.8 +/- 2.3 MPa, respectively).

[1]  A. Peutzfeldt,et al.  The influence of relative humidity on the effect of dentin bonding systems. , 2001, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[2]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. , 2003, American journal of dentistry.

[3]  F. García-Godoy,et al.  Effect of etching times and mechanical pretreatment on the enamel of primary teeth: an SEM study. , 1991, American journal of dentistry.

[4]  R. Carvalho,et al.  Durability of resin dentin interfaces: effects of surface moisture and adhesive solvent component. , 2004, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[5]  R. Feigal,et al.  Reducing microleakage of sealants under salivary contamination: digital-image analysis evaluation. , 1994, Quintessence international.

[6]  S. Uno,et al.  Effects of mechanical properties of adhesive resins on bond strength to dentin. , 2002, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[7]  S. Armstrong,et al.  Microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground and unground enamel. , 2002, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[8]  R. Simonsen Pit and fissure sealant: review of the literature. , 2002, Pediatric dentistry.

[9]  R. Frankenberger,et al.  A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occurs in self-etch adhesives. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[10]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to enamel. , 2003, American journal of dentistry.

[11]  D. Pashley,et al.  Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength--evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. , 1994, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[12]  J. Perdigão,et al.  In vivo influence of residual moisture on microtensile bond strengths of one-bottle adhesives. , 2002, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[13]  L. Straffon,et al.  Evaluating tooth eruption on sealant efficacy. , 1990, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[14]  M. Buonocore A Simple Method of Increasing the Adhesion of Acrylic Filling Materials to Enamel Surfaces , 1955, Journal of dental research.

[15]  N. Nakabayashi,et al.  The effect of phosphoric acid concentration on resin tag length and bond strength of a photo-cured resin to acid-etched enamel. , 2000, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[16]  D. Pashley,et al.  The microtensile bond test: a review. , 1999, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[17]  M. Hashimoto,et al.  Resin-enamel bonds made with self-etching primers on ground enamel. , 2003, European journal of oral sciences.

[18]  A. Reis,et al.  Effect of smear layer thickness and acidity of self-etching solutions on early and long-term bond strength to dentin. , 2005, Journal of dentistry.

[19]  F. García-Godoy,et al.  Effect of etching time and acid concentration on resin shear bond strength to primary tooth enamel. , 1992, American journal of dentistry.

[20]  Michael H. Kutner Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[21]  W. Finger,et al.  Salivary contamination during bonding procedures with a one-bottle adhesive system. , 1998, Quintessence international.

[22]  A. Reis,et al.  Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesive systems applied on occlusal primary enamel. , 2004, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[23]  D. Ranly,et al.  Effect of dentin adhesives on sealant bond strength. , 1991, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[24]  M. Hannig,et al.  Microleakage and SEM evaluation of fissure sealants placed by use of self-etching priming agents. , 2004, E -journal of dentistry.