The Interaction With Task-induced Activity is More Important Than Polarization: A tDCS Study

BACKGROUND Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (A-tDCS) is a non-invasive technique in which cortical polarization can be used to increase excitability and facilitate learning through the modulation of neuroplasticity. Although the facilitatory effects of A-tDCS are well documented, there is evidence that they are not always present and may even be reversed during task execution. OBJECTIVE In this study, we explored the interaction between A-tDCS and task execution. We aimed to test how the excitability induced by the task interacts with the excitability induced by A-tDCS and determines the behavioral outcome. METHODS We performed an experiment in which A-tDCS or a control stimulation (Ctrl) were combined with one of two motor practices (MP), one inducing learning and increasing cortical excitability (F-MP) and the other neither inducing learning nor changing cortical excitability (S-MP). Six blocks of MP were performed while the primary motor cortex was stimulated. Moreover, one block of F-MP was performed before the stimulation (baseline) and one after. In an additional experiment, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded before the baseline block (TMS-pre) and after the MP (TMS-post). RESULTS We observed that A-tDCS reduced learning when participants performed the F-MP and facilitated learning for the S-MP. MEPs data paralleled behavioral results, confirming that the effects generated by A-tDCS depend on the excitability changes induced by the task. CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrate that tDCS-induced plasticity is task-dependent, and the concurrent combination of A-tDCS with another excitability-increasing event, e.g., motor practice, may trigger non-additive mechanisms, hindering neuroplasticity.

[1]  M. Hallett,et al.  Early consolidation in human primary motor cortex , 2002, Nature.

[2]  John W Krakauer,et al.  Probing for hemispheric specialization for motor skill learning: a transcranial direct current stimulation study. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  P. Matthews,et al.  Polarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  Sarah E. Pekny,et al.  Stimulation of the Human Motor Cortex Alters Generalization Patterns of Motor Learning , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Diminution of training-induced transient motor cortex plasticity by weak transcranial direct current stimulation in the human , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[8]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Induction of Late LTP-Like Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex by Repeated Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[9]  Heidi M. Schambra,et al.  Direct Current Stimulation Promotes BDNF-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity: Potential Implications for Motor Learning , 2010, Neuron.

[10]  A. Antal,et al.  Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients , 2007, Brain Research Bulletin.

[11]  R. Young,et al.  Brain stimulation. , 1990, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[12]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Facilitation of visuo‐motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor and extrastriate visual areas in humans , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[13]  Ulf Ziemann,et al.  Homeostatic and Nonhomeostatic Modulation of Learning in Human Motor Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Consensus: "Can tDCS and TMS enhance motor learning and memory formation?" , 2008, Brain stimulation.

[15]  A B Schwartz,et al.  Motor cortical representation of speed and direction during reaching. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  M. Hallett,et al.  Role of the human motor cortex in rapid motor learning , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  A. Priori.  Brain polarization in humans: a reappraisal of an old tool for prolonged non-invasive modulation of brain excitability , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  Paul Sacco,et al.  Modulation of internal model formation during force field‐induced motor learning by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex , 2009, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Contributions of the cerebellum and the motor cortex to acquisition and retention of motor memories , 2014, NeuroImage.

[20]  Takashi Hanakawa,et al.  Enhancement of pinch force in the lower leg by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Time course of the induction of homeostatic plasticity generated by repeated transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Janine Reis,et al.  Modulation of motor performance and motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation. , 2011, Current opinion in neurology.

[23]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Movement parameters and neural activity in motor cortex and area 5. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008 , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[25]  Dieter Hauschke,et al.  The time course of motor cortex plasticity after spaced motor practice , 2011, Brain Stimulation.

[26]  P. Celnik,et al.  Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  D. Ruge,et al.  Learning Modifies Subsequent Induction of Long-Term Potentiation-Like and Long-Term Depression-Like Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  H. Siebner.  A primer on priming the human motor cortex , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  Pablo Celnik,et al.  Brain polarization enhances the formation and retention of motor memories. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Hartwig R. Siebner,et al.  Modifying motor learning through gating and homeostatic metaplasticity , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[31]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Consensus: Can transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation enhance motor learning and memory formation? , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[34]  L. Bindman,et al.  The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long‐lasting after‐effects , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[35]  Tobias Bonhoeffer,et al.  Homeostatic shutdown of long-term potentiation in the adult hippocampus. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Enhancement of Planning Ability by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Timing-Dependent Modulation of Associative Plasticity by General Network Excitability in the Human Motor Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Imaging Brain Plasticity during Motor Skill Learning , 2002, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[39]  G. Thickbroom,et al.  Interaction Between Simultaneously Applied Neuromodulatory Interventions in Humans , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[40]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  W. Paulus,et al.  Towards unravelling task-related modulations of neuroplastic changes induced in the human motor cortex , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[42]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Partially non‐linear stimulation intensity‐dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[43]  W. Abraham.  Metaplasticity: tuning synapses and networks for plasticity , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[44]  Carlo Miniussi,et al.  The mechanism of transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognition , 2010, Cortex.

[45]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Direct Current Stimulation over V5 Enhances Visuomotor Coordination by Improving Motion Perception in Humans , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  Paolo Maria Rossini,et al.  Naming facilitation induced by transcranial direct current stimulation , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[47]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Enhancement of non-dominant hand motor function by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[48]  Nicole Wenderoth,et al.  Task-Specific Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Learning , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[49]  A B Schwartz,et al.  Arm trajectory and representation of movement processing in motor cortical activity , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[50]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Modelling Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Cognitive Neuroscience , 2022 .

[51]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Facilitation of Implicit Motor Learning by Weak Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex in the Human , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[53]  S. Gandevia,et al.  Training in a ballistic task but not a visuomotor task increases responses to stimulation of human corticospinal axons. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.