Phase determination during normal running using kinematic data

Algorithms to predict heelstrike and toe-off times during normal running at subject-selected speeds, using only kinematic data, are presented. To assess the accuracy of these algorithms, results are compared with synchronised force platform recordings from ten subjects performing ten trials each. Using a single 180Hz camera, positioned in the sagittal plane, the average RMS error in predicting heelstrike times is 4.5 ms, whereas the average RMS error in predicting toe-off times is 6.9ms. Average true errors (negative for an early prediction) are +2.4 ms for heelstrike and +2.8ms for toe-off, indicating that systematic errors have not occured. The average RMS error in predicting contact time is 7.5ms, and the average true error in predicting contact time is 0.5ms. Estimations of event times using these simple algorithms compare favourably with other techniques requiring specialised equipment. It is concluded that the proposed algorithms provide an easy and reliable method of determining event times during normal running at a subject selected pace using only kinematic data and can be implemented with any kinematic data-collection system.

[1]  B T Bates,et al.  Asynchrony between subtalar and knee joint function during running. , 1999, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  G Gifford,et al.  A gait analysis system in clinical practice. , 1983, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[3]  R. Brand,et al.  The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly, and pathological , 1992 .

[4]  R. Mann,et al.  Biomechanics of walking, running, and sprinting , 1980, The American journal of sports medicine.

[5]  C Peham,et al.  Limb locomotion--speed distribution analysis as a new method for stance phase detection. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  P. Bowker,et al.  A simple low cost footswitch. , 1991, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[7]  R. Mann,et al.  Comparative electromyography of the lower extremity in jogging, running, and sprinting , 1986, The American journal of sports medicine.

[8]  J C Wall,et al.  Measurement of the temporal and spatial parameters of gait using a microcomputer based system. , 1987, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[9]  V P Stokes,et al.  A new method to measure foot contact. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Footswitch system for measurement of the temporal parameters of gait. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  R N Marshall,et al.  Algorithms to determine event timing during normal walking using kinematic data. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  J. Vilensky,et al.  Temporal gait parameters in humans and quadrupeds: How do they change with speed? , 1984 .

[13]  S. J. Stanhope,et al.  Kinematic-based technique for event time determination during gait , 1990, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[14]  J D Ross,et al.  A thin foot switch. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  Peggy Arnell,et al.  The Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Gait , 1988 .

[16]  R. P. Wells,et al.  Assessment of signal and noise in the kinematics of normal, pathological and sporting gaits. , 1980 .

[17]  Ralph Mann,et al.  Kinematic Analysis of Olympic Sprint Performance: Men's 200 Meters , 1985 .

[18]  Pekka Luhtanen,et al.  Photocell Contact Mat: A New Instrument to Measure Contact and Flight Times in Running , 1997 .

[19]  R J Minns.  A conductive rubber footswitch design for gait analysis. , 1982, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[20]  R. Shiavi,et al.  Variability of electromyographic patterns for level-surface walking through a range of self-selected speeds. , 1981, Bulletin of prosthetics research.