Effect of changes in orientation and position of external loads on trunk muscle activity and kinematics in upright standing.

Forces at different heights and orientations are often carried by hands while performing occupational tasks. Trunk muscle activity and spinal loads are likely dependent on not only moments but also the orientation and height of these forces. Here, we measured trunk kinematics and select superficial muscle activity of 12 asymptomatic subjects while supporting forces in hands in upright standing. Magnitude of forces in 5 orientations (-25°, 0°, 25°, 50° and 90°) and 2 heights (20cm and 40cm) were adjusted to generate flexion moments of 15, 30 and 45Nm at the L5-S1 disc centre. External forces were of much greater magnitude when applied at lower elevation or oriented upward at 25°. Spinal kinematics remained nearly unchanged in various tasks. Changes in orientation and elevation of external forces substantially influenced the recorded EMG, despite similar trunk posture and identical moments at the L5-S1. Greater EMG activity was overall recorded under larger forces albeit constant moment. Increases in the external moment at the L5-S1 substantially increased EMG in extensor muscles (p<0.001) but had little effect on abdominals; e.g., mean longissimus EMG for all orientations increased by 38% and 75% as the moment level altered from 15Nm to 30Nm and to 45Nm while that in the rectus abdominus increased only by 2% and 4%, respectively. Under 45Nm moment and as the load orientation altered from 90° to 50°, 25°, 0° and -25°, mean EMG dropped by 3%, 12%, 12% and 1% in back muscles and by 17%, 17%, 19% and 13% in abdominals, respectively. As the load elevation increased from 20cm to 40cm, mean EMG under maximum moment decreased by 21% in back muscles and by 17% in abdominals. Due to the lack of EMG recording of deep lumbar muscles, changes in relative shear/compression components and different net moments at cranial discs despite identical moments at the caudal L5-S1 disc, complementary model studies are essential for a better comprehension of neuromuscular strategies in response to alterations in load height and orientation.

[1]  D Chaffin,et al.  High-pass filtering to remove electrocardiographic interference from torso EMG recordings. , 1993, Clinical biomechanics.

[2]  Andrew S Merryweather,et al.  A revised back compressive force estimation model for ergonomic evaluation of lifting tasks. , 2009, Work.

[3]  B. Murphy,et al.  The validity and reliability of surface EMG to assess the neuromuscular response of the abdominal muscles to rapid limb movement. , 2003, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[4]  I. Stokes,et al.  The Effects of Abdominal Muscle Coactivation on Lumbar Spine Stability , 1998, Spine.

[5]  I. Kingma,et al.  Effect of lifting height and load mass on low back loading , 2008, Ergonomics.

[6]  N Arjmand,et al.  A novel approach to evaluate abdominal coactivities for optimal spinal stability and compression force in lifting , 2009, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[7]  Karl F. Orishimo,et al.  Response of trunk muscle coactivation to changes in spinal stability. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  I. Stokes,et al.  Spinal stiffness increases with axial load: another stabilizing consequence of muscle action. , 2003, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[9]  William S. Marras,et al.  Regression Models for Predicting Peak and Continuous Three-Dimensional Spinal Loads during Symmetric and Asymmetric Lifting Tasks , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[10]  Offering proper feedback to control for out-of-plane lumbar moments influences the activity of trunk muscles during unidirectional isometric trunk exertions. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  M Parnianpour,et al.  Predictive equations to estimate spinal loads in symmetric lifting tasks. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  A Plamondon,et al.  Coupled objective function to study the role of abdominal muscle forces in lifting using the kinematics-driven model , 2013, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[13]  S. McGill,et al.  Appropriately placed surface EMG electrodes reflect deep muscle activity (psoas, quadratus lumborum, abdominal wall) in the lumbar spine. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  W. Marras,et al.  Spine Loading Characteristics of Patients With Low Back Pain Compared With Asymptomatic Individuals , 2001, Spine.

[15]  Richard G. Snyder Link System of the Human Torso , 1972 .

[16]  Idsart Kingma,et al.  Trunk muscle activation and associated lumbar spine joint shear forces under different levels of external forward force applied to the trunk. , 2007, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[17]  W. Forrest,et al.  Muscle fibre direction of longissimus, iliocostalis and multifidus: landmark-derived reference lines. , 1989, Journal of anatomy.

[18]  S. McGill Kinetic Potential of the Lumbar Trunk Musculature About Three Orthogonal Orthopaedic Axes in Extreme Postures , 1991, Spine.

[19]  M. Solomonow,et al.  Methods to reduce the variability of EMG power spectrum estimates. , 1998, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[20]  A. Schultz,et al.  Biomechanics of the Human Spine and Trunk , 1988, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.