Lateral interactions in the control of visual sensitivity

Threshold vs intensity curves for cone vision, measured in the parafoveal retina, quickly saturate if the adapting background is made small (e.g. 19' at 5 degrees eccentricity). Log increment threshold increases at a rate of about 3:1 with log background illuminance at levels as low as 10 td. This shows that lateral interactions are an important process in preserving differential sensitivity in cone vision across the wide range of illuminances over which it normally operates. Parallels between light and dark adaptation in the effect of field size were explored, since effects of comparable magnitude are observed in both. Backgrounds and bleaches equated for their effects at one field size do not have equal effects on threshold at other field sizes, however, with small-area bleaches raising threshold more than predicted. This failure of equivalence was also revealed in a second experiment, in which recovery of sensitivity following small area bleaches was measured in the presence of large steady background fields, which have the effect of lowering threshold. Thresholds following the small bleach were lowered less than expected on the basis of the "equivalent background" hypothesis, a result which we take to mean that signals from bleached cones exceed those produced by a background which has an equivalent effect on threshold (the "equivalent background"). Control experiments examined whether rods contribute to the overloading of cone response by small fields and the possible contribution of such central adaptation processes as spatial frequency adaptation.

[1]  C. Stromeyer,et al.  Response saturation of short-wavelength cone pathways controlled by color-opponent mechanisms , 1979, Vision Research.

[2]  W. Geisler Evidence for the equivalent-background hypothesis in cones , 1979, Vision Research.

[3]  W. Stiles The Directional Sensitivity of the Retina and the Spectral Sensitivities of the Rods and Cones , 1939 .

[4]  J. Mollon,et al.  A curiosity of light adaptation , 1980, Nature.

[5]  A. Richter,et al.  Properties of centre‐hyperpolarizing, red‐sensitive bipolar cells in the turtle retina. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  W. Geisler Adaptation, afterimages and cone saturation , 1978, Vision Research.

[7]  D. Teller,et al.  Sensitization by annular surrounds: sensitization and dark adaptation. , 1969, Vision research.

[8]  D. A. Burkhardt,et al.  Sensitization and centre‐surround antagonism in Necturus retina , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  W A Rushton,et al.  Dark adaptation and increment threshold in a rod monochromat. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  M. Hayhoe After‐effects of small adapting fields. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  F. Werblin Control of Retinal Sensitivity II. Lateral Interactions at the Outer Plexiform Layer , 1974 .

[12]  P Lennie,et al.  Background configuration and rod threshold , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  Steven K. Shevell,et al.  Saturation in human cones , 1977, Vision Research.

[14]  S P McKee,et al.  Specificity of cone mechanisms in lateral interaction , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  F. Werblin,et al.  The response properties of the steady antagonistic surround in the mudpuppy retina. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  B. H. Crawford Visual adaptation in relation to brief conditioning stimuli , 1947, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[17]  M. Hollins,et al.  Dark Adaptation and Visual Pigment Regeneration in Human Cones , 1973, The Journal of general physiology.

[18]  Donald C. Hood,et al.  Human cone saturation as a function of ambient intensity: A test of models of shifts in the dynamic range , 1978, Vision Research.

[19]  R. Massof,et al.  Spectral scanning retinal densitometer (A) , 1980 .

[20]  E. A. Schwartz,et al.  Colour‐dependence of cone responses in the turtle retina , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  B. H. Crawford The effect of field size and pattern on the change of visual sensitivity with time , 1940, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[22]  F. Werblin,et al.  Control of Retinal Sensitivity: I. Light and Dark Adaptation of Vertebrate Rods and Cones , 1974 .

[23]  G. Westheimer Spatial interaction in human cone vision , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  G. Westheimer Bleached rhodopsin and retinal interaction , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  W. Stiles,et al.  Saturation of the Rod Mechanism of the Retina at High Levels of Stimulation , 1954 .

[26]  J. A. Cramer,et al.  Nonequivalence of backgrounds during photopic dark adaptation. , 1970, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[27]  P. Lennie,et al.  Rod‐cone interaction in light adaptation , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  A. Vassilev Contrast sensitivity near borders: significance of test stimulus form, size and duration. , 1973, Vision research.

[29]  S. H. Bartley,et al.  THE EFFECT OF ONE BORDER IN THE VISUAL FIELD UPON THE THRESHOLD OF ANOTHER , 1935 .

[30]  S. Burns,et al.  The achromatic channel—I. The non-linearity of minimum-border and flicker matches , 1978, Vision Research.

[31]  M. Hayhoe Lateral interactions in human cone dark adaptation. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  P. King-Smith,et al.  The use of photopic saturation in determining the fundamental spectral sensitivity curves. , 1974, Vision Research.

[33]  W A Rushton,et al.  Signals from cones , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[34]  J. Limb,et al.  Thresholds at luminance edges under stabilized viewing conditions. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[35]  S. Klein,et al.  Is spatial adaptation caused by prolonged inhibition? , 1977, Vision Research.

[36]  M. Hayhoe,et al.  Surround configuration and cone dark adaptation , 1980, Vision Research.

[37]  R M Boynton,et al.  Vision: The Additivity Law Made To Work for Heterochromatic Photometry with Bipartite Fields , 1968, Science.

[38]  R. M. Boynton,et al.  Visual Adaptation in Monkey Cones: Recordings of Late Receptor Potentials , 1970, Science.

[39]  H. Barlow Dark and Light Adaptation: Psychophysics , 1972 .

[40]  A. Kaneko Physiology of the retina. , 1979, Annual review of neuroscience.

[41]  J M Enoch,et al.  Static perimetric technique believed to test receptive field properties. I. Extension of Westheimer's experiments on spatial interaction. , 1970, American journal of ophthalmology.

[42]  W A Rushton,et al.  Bleached rhodopson and visual adaptation. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[43]  M Alpern,et al.  The kinetics of cone visual pigments in man. , 1971, Vision research.

[44]  D. Teller,et al.  Sensitization by annular surrounds: sensitization and masking. , 1971, Vision research.

[45]  C F Stromeyer,et al.  Detection of red and green flashes: evidence for cancellation and facilitation. , 1978, Sensory processes.

[46]  C. F. Stromeyer,et al.  On inhibition between spatial frequency channels: Adaptation to complex gratings , 1980, Vision Research.

[47]  G. Wyszecki,et al.  Axial chromatic aberration of the human eye. , 1957, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[48]  H B Barlow,et al.  Dark-adaptation: a new hypothesis. , 1964, Vision research.

[49]  W A Rushton,et al.  The rod increment threshold during dark adaptation in normal and rod monochromat. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[50]  J. Mollon,et al.  Saturation of a retinal cone mechanism , 1977, Nature.

[51]  K. Alexander Sensitization by annular surrounds: the effect of test stimulus size. , 1974, Vision research.

[52]  L. Temme,et al.  Rod-cone interaction in human scotopic vision—III: Rods influence cone increment thresholds , 1977, Vision Research.

[53]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  Changes in time scale and sensitivity in turtle photoreceptors , 1974, The Journal of physiology.