Does it matter how I perceive my nation? National symbols, national identification and attitudes toward immigrants.

We examined how the ways of imagining one's own nation relate to the relationship between national identification and individuals' attitudes towards immigrants. National imagination is studied through two types of national symbols representing the nation in terms of confrontation between groups (i.e., war and sports) and a unique entity (i.e., nature and traditional culture). We found that national identification was positively associated with the degree to which individuals perceived their nation through a historical war and sports, which, in turn, enhanced negative attitudes toward immigrants. Unexpectedly, the degree to which individuals perceived their nation through nature and traditional culture was positively associated with positive intergroup attitudes. The results emphasize that the degree to which individuals perceive their nation through different national symbols is an important factor for understanding intergroup relations.

[1]  N. Fligstein,et al.  European Integration, Nationalism and European Identity , 2012 .

[2]  S. Reicher,et al.  The Impact of Adopting Ethnic or Civic Conceptions of National Belonging for Others’ Treatment , 2011, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[3]  F. Pichler.  Foundations of anti-immigrant sentiment: The variable nature of perceived group threat across changing European societies, 2002-2006 , 2010 .

[4]  K. Liebkind,et al.  National symbols and distinctiveness: rhetorical strategies in creating distinct national identities. , 2010, The British journal of social psychology.

[5]  F. Boen,et al.  The role of national identity representation in the relation between in-group identification and out-group derogation: ethnic versus civic representation. , 2010, The British journal of social psychology.

[6]  Rupert Brown,et al.  National Identification And Anti-Immigrant Prejudice: Individual And Contextual Effects Of National Definitions , 2009 .

[7]  Andrew Livingstone,et al.  The importance of social identity content in a setting of chronic social conflict: understanding intergroup relations in Northern Ireland. , 2008, The British journal of social psychology.

[8]  M. Cinnirella,et al.  National identification, type and specificity of comparison and their effects on descriptions of national character , 2007 .

[9]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[10]  Jay W. Jackson,et al.  Intergroup Attitudes as a Function of Different Dimensions of Group Identification and Perceived Intergroup Conflict , 2002 .

[11]  A. Manstead,et al.  Similarity as a source of differentiation: the role of group identification , 2001 .

[12]  N. Akrami,et al.  Classical and modern racial prejudice: a study of attitudes toward immigrants in Sweden , 2000 .

[13]  Walker Connor.  Beyond Reason: The Nature of the Ethnonational Bond , 1993 .

[14]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[15]  J. Phinney.  The Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure , 1992 .

[16]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  J. B. Mcconahay,et al.  Has Racism Declined in America? , 1981 .

[18]  A. J. Conger.  A Revised Definition for Suppressor Variables: a Guide To Their Identification and Interpretation , 1974 .

[19]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[20]  Thomas F. Pettigrew,et al.  Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe , 1995 .

[21]  P. Watzlawick.  The Language of Change , 1978 .