Modelling transport modal shift in TIMES models through elasticities of substitution

Several efforts have been directed lately towards the endogenisation of transport modes competition in Energy/Economy/Environment/Engineering (E4) models. TIMES-DKEMS is a novel methodology paving the way for applying elasticities of substitution to incorporate transport modal shift into TIMES (The Integrated MARKAL-EFOM System) models. Substitution elasticities are defined for four transport demand aggregates, each corresponding to a different distance range class. Within an aggregate, modal demands can adjust their levels according to the defined substitution elasticity and in response to changes of their shadow prices relative to a reference case. The total volume of the transport demand over the aggregate is conserved and modal shift potentials are implemented to guarantee realistic dynamics. The behavior of TIMES-DKEMS is tested under an arbitrary environmental policy, an increasingly stringent bound on CO2 emissions. Modal shares are compared with the standard version of TIMES-DK. Results show that in 2050, 11% of car mobility demand is substituted by more efficient and less costly modes such as train and coach. A sensitivity analysis on the values of substitution elasticities indicates that higher absolute values correspond to larger modal shift. Finally, other model constraints, such as mode-specific travel patterns, interact with the substitution mechanism resulting in a modal shift containment.

[1]  M. Wardman,et al.  Triggers of Urban Passenger Mode Shift – State of the Art and Model Evidence , 2016 .

[2]  K. Train Qualitative Choice Analysis: Theory, Econometrics, and an Application to Automobile Demand , 1985 .

[3]  Zhenhong Lin,et al.  Improving the behavioral realism of global integrated assessment models: An application to consumers’ vehicle choices , 2017 .

[4]  B. Ó. Gallachóir,et al.  Improvements in the representation of behavior in integrated energy and transport models , 2018, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation.

[5]  D. McFadden,et al.  URBAN TRAVEL DEMAND - A BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS , 1977 .

[6]  Cristina Sarasa,et al.  Modeling the Carbon Consequences of Pro-environmental Consumer Behavior , 2016 .

[7]  Kenneth Bernard Karlsson,et al.  Residential heat pumps in the future Danish energy system , 2016 .

[8]  Valerie J. Karplus,et al.  Applying engineering and fleet detail to represent passenger vehicle transport in a computable general equilibrium model , 2013 .

[9]  Sonia Yeh,et al.  Formalizing best practice for energy system optimization modelling , 2017 .

[10]  Jacopo Tattini,et al.  Reaching carbon neutral transport sector in Denmark – Evidence from the incorporation of modal shift into the TIMES energy system modeling framework , 2018 .

[11]  P. E. Grohnheit,et al.  A global renewable energy system: A modelling exercise in ETSAP/TIAM , 2011 .

[12]  David L. McCollum,et al.  Deep greenhouse gas reduction scenarios for California – Strategic implications from the CA-TIMES energy-economic systems model , 2012 .

[13]  Weilong Huang,et al.  TIMES modelling of transport sector in China and USA: Comparisons from a decarbonization perspective☆ , 2016 .

[14]  Kalai Ramea,et al.  Achieving California's 80% greenhouse gas reduction target in 2050: Technology, policy and scenario analysis using CA-TIMES energy economic systems model , 2015 .

[15]  Mark Jaccard,et al.  Improving behavioral realism in hybrid energy-economy models using discrete choice studies of personal transportation decisions , 2005 .

[16]  Céline Guivarch,et al.  The transportation sector and low-carbon growth pathways: modelling urban, infrastructure, and spatial determinants of mobility , 2013 .

[17]  Sonia Yeh,et al.  Incorporating travel behaviour and travel time into TIMES energy system models , 2014 .

[18]  Sebastiaan Deetman,et al.  Global travel within the 2°C climate target , 2012 .

[19]  Steve Pye,et al.  Modelling sustainable urban travel in a whole systems energy model , 2015 .

[20]  Jean-Philippe Waaub,et al.  Electrification of the Canadian Road Transportation Sector: A 2050 Outlook with TIMES-Canada , 2013 .

[21]  C. Brand,et al.  The UK transport carbon model: An integrated life cycle approach to explore low carbon futures , 2012 .

[22]  A. Roskilly,et al.  Novel technologies and strategies for clean transport systems , 2015 .

[23]  J. P. Deane,et al.  Modelling the impacts of challenging 2050 European climate mitigation targets on Ireland’s energy system , 2013 .

[24]  M. Ha-Duong,et al.  Climate change 2014 - Mitigation of climate change , 2015 .

[25]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[26]  P. Goodwin,et al.  Elasticities of Road Traffic and Fuel Consumption with Respect to Price and Income: A Review , 2004 .

[27]  Christopher Yang,et al.  Improving the representation of modal choice into bottom-up optimization energy system models - The MoCho-TIMES model , 2018 .

[28]  G. Currie,et al.  Competition and substitution between public transport modes , 2018, Research in Transportation Economics.

[29]  J. Anable,et al.  Scientific research about climate change mitigation in transport: a critical review , 2011 .

[30]  Nadia Maïzi,et al.  Integrating household behavior and heterogeneity into the TIMES-Households model , 2015 .