Beyond internal OR groups

The paper reviews the prospects of OR applied by dispersed practitioners, small providers of OR services, academics and OR consultants, in other words OR applied by those not located inside internal OR groups. Many in the UK have regarded the activities of OR groups as the defining practice of our profession. The Survival and Success of OR Groups (SSOR) study indicates that within a fairly stable population of OR practitioners the number of internal OR groups is in decline while the number of external, consulting groups is growing. There are good reasons in terms of the diffusion of innovation for assuming that this trend will continue. Against that possibility, the OR profession in the UK needs to reassess the defining aspects of OR and the implications for the activities of the profession in the future. Using the language of strategy, the profession needs to identify its core competencies, define how they are distinctive, consider how they can be developed and maintained, and determine through which channels they can be delivered. One of the key battlegrounds is within the management consultancies where the competing approaches of management science and organisational development vie for supremacy.

[1]  C. Eden Operational research as negotiation , 1989 .

[2]  Richard J. Ormerod,et al.  Response to Miser: The Objects and Objectives of Operational Research , 1996 .

[3]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  The Natural Drift: What Happened to Operations Research? , 1993, Oper. Res..

[4]  Richard J. Ormerod,et al.  The role of OR in shaping the future: smart bits, helpful ways and things that matter , 1997 .

[5]  I J Disley,et al.  A life in OR , 1997 .

[6]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Report of the Commission on the Future Practice of Operational Research , 1986 .

[7]  Michael Jackson,et al.  Present positions and future prospects in management science , 1987 .

[8]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  Toward A Rational Society , 1970 .

[9]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  Critical Systems Thinking for Citizens , 1996 .

[10]  Arnold Reisman,et al.  The Devolution of OR/MS: Implications from a Statistical Content Analysis of Papers in Flagship Journals , 1994, Oper. Res..

[11]  Robert Fildes,et al.  Success and survival of operational research groups—A review , 1997 .

[12]  Hugh J. Miser,et al.  OR Forum - Presidents' Symposium: Science and Professionalism in Operations Research , 1987, Oper. Res..

[13]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  On purposeful systems , 1972 .

[14]  H. Demsetz,et al.  Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization , 1975, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[15]  Hugh J. Miser Comments on ‘OR as Technology’ , 1991 .

[16]  Oliver E. Williamson,et al.  Markets, hierarchies, and the modern corporation: An unfolding perspective , 1992 .

[17]  Hugh J. Miser,et al.  Comments Prompted by ‘On the Nature of OR—Entering the Fray’ , 1996 .

[18]  Richard J. Ormerod,et al.  On the Nature of OR — Entering the Fray , 1996 .

[19]  P. Keys,et al.  OR as Technology: Some Issues and Implications , 1989 .

[20]  A. Abbott The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor , 1988 .