Flow regulation reduces native plant cover and facilitates exotic invasion in riparian wetlands

Summary 1. River regulation and exotic plant invasion threaten riverine ecosystems, and the two often co-occur. By altering water regimes, flow regulation can facilitate plant invasion by providing conditions that directly benefit invading species, or by reducing competition from native species unsuited to the modified conditions. Integrating water and weed management has the potential to limit riparian plant invasion and maximize the ecological benefit of environmental flows. 2. We surveyed plant communities and modelled flood histories of 24 riparian wetlands along the regulated River Murray, south-eastern Australia. There were no suitable control rivers, so we compared modelled pre- and post-regulation hydrological data to quantify hydrological change in the study wetlands. Regression analyses revealed relationships between hydrological modification and cover of native non-weed, native weed and exotic weed groups and 10 individual species. 3. Exotic cover was highest and native non-weed cover lowest in wetlands that had experienced the greatest change in hydrology – a reduction in peak flow. Native weeds did not respond to hydrological modification indicating that exotic species’ success was not reliant on their generalist characteristics. 4. By altering habitat filters, hydrological modification caused a decline in amphibious native non-weed species cover and simultaneously provided drier conditions that directly favoured the exotic species group dominated by terrestrial species. Exotic species were potentially further assisted by human-mediated dispersal. 5. Species and functional diversity was inversely related to exotic cover. By shifting the balance between native and exotic taxa and changing community functional composition, flow regulation may disrupt the ecological function and ecosystem services of floodplain wetlands. 6. Synthesis and applications. Worldwide, flow regulation has led to riverine ecosystems becoming more terrestrial. The success of most introduced plants relies on minimal inundation. In this study, flood magnitude was more important than frequency, timing, or duration for wetland flora because it reflects spatial extent and depth of flooding. Augmenting natural spring floods with environmental flows will kill terrestrial weeds and facilitate native macrophyte growth. Combined with strategies for managing particular amphibious weeds, we recommend flows of 117 000–147 000 ML day−1 for at least 2 days every 10 years for River Murray wetland weed management.

[1]  P. Weisberg,et al.  Does river regulation increase the dominance of invasive woody species in riparian landscapes , 2010 .

[2]  P. Vesk,et al.  What does species richness tell us about functional trait diversity? Predictions and evidence for responses of species and functional trait diversity to land-use change , 2010 .

[3]  U. Treier,et al.  Evidence for a combination of pre‐adapted traits and rapid adaptive change in the invasive plant Centaurea stoebe , 2010 .

[4]  P. Boon,et al.  The importance of water regimes operating at small spatial scales for the diversity and structure of wetland vegetation , 2010 .

[5]  M. Fischer,et al.  A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[6]  J. Catford,et al.  Using multi‐scale species distribution data to infer drivers of biological invasion in riparian wetlands , 2010 .

[7]  D. Lytle,et al.  Theory, methods and tools for determining environmental flows for riparian vegetation: riparian vegetation‐flow response guilds , 2010 .

[8]  M. Leishman,et al.  Functional trait differences between extant exotic, native and extinct native plants in the Hunter River, NSW: a potential tool in riparian rehabilitation , 2009 .

[9]  Kelly H. Laycock,et al.  Disturbance and species displacement: different tolerances to stream drying and desiccation in a native and an invasive crayfish , 2009 .

[10]  M. Hill,et al.  Do urban areas act as foci for the spread of alien plant species? An assessment of temporal trends in the UK , 2009 .

[11]  C. Nilsson,et al.  Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework , 2009 .

[12]  Catherine S. Jarnevich,et al.  Modelling invasion for a habitat generalist and a specialist plant species , 2008 .

[13]  Yvonne M. Buckley,et al.  The role of research for integrated management of invasive species, invaded landscapes and communities , 2008 .

[14]  Wolfgang Nentwig,et al.  Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for integrating pathways into policy , 2008 .

[15]  A. Moles,et al.  A new framework for predicting invasive plant species , 2007 .

[16]  P. Shafroth,et al.  Altered stream-flow regimes and invasive plant species : the Tamarix case , 2007 .

[17]  Karen J. Esler,et al.  Riparian vegetation: degradation, alien plant invasions, and restoration prospects , 2007 .

[18]  R. Randall,et al.  The introduced flora of Australia and its weed status. , 2007 .

[19]  R. Naiman,et al.  The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[20]  H. MacIsaac,et al.  Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions , 2006, Biological Invasions.

[21]  P. Gagnon,et al.  Hydrological factors controlling the spread of common reed (Phragmites australis) in the St. Lawrence River (Québec, Canada) , 2005 .

[22]  Per Capita,et al.  About the authors , 1995, Machine Vision and Applications.

[23]  B. Elderd THE IMPACT OF CHANGING FLOW REGIMES ON RIPARIAN VEGETATION AND THE RIPARIAN SPECIES MIMULUS GUTTATUS , 2003 .

[24]  A. Arthington,et al.  Flow restoration and protection in Australian rivers , 2003 .

[25]  G. Quinn,et al.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2002 .

[26]  M. Crawley,et al.  Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis , 2002 .

[27]  J. Walter,et al.  Effects of flood interruption on species richness, diversity and floristic composition of woody regeneration in the upper rhine alluvial hardwood forest , 2001 .

[28]  Susan M. Galatowitsch,et al.  Effects of water regime and competition on the establishment of a native sedge in restored wetlands , 2000 .

[29]  J. Howell,et al.  Predicting potential impacts of environmental flows on weedy riparian vegetation of the Hawkesbury–Nepean River, south-eastern Australia , 2000 .

[30]  Richard A. Wadsworth,et al.  Simulating the spread and management of alien riparian weeds: are they out of control? , 2000 .

[31]  Crawley,et al.  Invasion‐resistance in experimental grassland communities: species richness or species identity? , 1999 .

[32]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[33]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[34]  D. Tilman,et al.  Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  D. Richardson,et al.  What attributes make some plant species more invasive , 1996 .

[36]  K. Rice,et al.  Patterns of Growth and Soil-water Utilization in some Exotic Annuals and Native Perennial Bunchgrasses of California , 1996 .

[37]  R. Sheley,et al.  Managing riparian weeds. , 1995 .

[38]  P. Keddy,et al.  The assembly of experimental wetland plant communities , 1995 .

[39]  E. Tabacchi,et al.  Changes in the hydrological regime and invasions by plant species along riparian systems of the Adour River, France , 1995 .

[40]  T. McMahon,et al.  Effects of regulation on the flow regime of the river Murray, Australia , 1995 .

[41]  C. Nilsson,et al.  Fragmentation and Flow Regulation of River Systems in the Northern Third of the World , 1994, Science.

[42]  W. Lonsdale,et al.  Fire as a Management Tool for a Tropical Woody Weed: Mimosa pigra in Northern Australia , 1993 .

[43]  K. A. Poiani,et al.  A Spatial Simulation Model of Hydrology and Vegetation Dynamics in Semi-Permanent Prairie Wetlands. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[44]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species , 1967, The American Naturalist.