Analysis of electric vehicle charge scheduling and effects on electricity demand costs

Due to the recent inflow of electric vehicles (EVs) to the automobile market, new concerns have risen with respect to the additional electrical load and the resultant effects on an overloaded electric grid. It takes approximately three to four hours to fully charge the battery of some common EVs depending on battery capacities. Either for convenience purposes or possibly necessity due to limited electric range on EVs, some EV owners may desire to charge their EV while at work in addition to charging at home. These forward-thinking daytime charging providers are typically Commercial and Industrial (C&I) electric ratepayers, or other large electric consumers which constitute the majority of businesses, shopping centers, academic campuses and manufacturing facilities. C&I consumers generally pay for electricity consumption based not only on total energy consumed, but also on peak electric demand measurements because certain portions of the working day are traditionally associated with C&I peak load periods. Electricity consumption during these periods results in higher electricity costs due to differences in the billing structures. Therefore, uncontrolled EV charging in large numbers potentially creates significant peak demand increases resulting in higher electric costs for the C&I ratepayer and exacerbating grid issues relating to electric generation and grid stability. Proper scheduling of EV charging is a necessity to avoid such increases in peak electric demand. Scheduling can be implemented in a number of ways including traditional process control strategies such as model predictive control or machine scheduling algorithms. When viewed as a parallel machine scheduling problem, charging stations can be considered as identical machines and the EV charging transactions required can be seen as jobs with varying processing times and due dates. The goal of such an algorithm is to schedule EV charging so that total electricity cost is minimized but off-peak charging activity is maximized. Due to the nature of electricity billing structures and cost calculations for C&I ratepayers, the machine scheduling algorithm must use time index based operations. This paper examines the EV charge scheduling problem and casts it as a parallel machine scheduling problem with availability constraints. Particularly, this study develops several heuristic scheduling algorithms such as Greedy Local Search and Simulated Annealing. These algorithms are evaluated using MATLAB (Mathworks MATLAB R2012b, 2012) to compare performance. In addition, the general-purpose optimization solver CPLEX (Ibm, ILOG CPLEX, 2012) is used to determine exact solutions for small size problems, which is then used to benchmark the performance of the other algorithms studied.

[1]  J. Doob Stochastic processes , 1953 .

[2]  Walid Saad,et al.  Economics of Electric Vehicle Charging: A Game Theoretic Approach , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[3]  W. Thammasiriroj,et al.  The impact of unexpected power demand from electric vehicles on future load profiles: Case study on Thailand , 2011, ISGT 2011.

[4]  G.B. Shrestha,et al.  A study of electric vehicle battery charging demand in the context of Singapore , 2007, 2007 International Power Engineering Conference (IPEC 2007).

[5]  Sami Repo,et al.  Statistical Charging Load Modeling of PHEVs in Electricity Distribution Networks Using National Travel Survey Data , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[6]  M. McIntyre,et al.  A Power Monitoring and Control System to minimize electricity demand costs associated with Electric Vehicle charging stations , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Electric Vehicle Conference.

[7]  Yue Yuan,et al.  Modeling of Load Demand Due to EV Battery Charging in Distribution Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  Johan Driesen,et al.  Coordinated charging of multiple plug-in hybrid electric vehicles in residential distribution grids , 2009, 2009 IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition.

[9]  G. Gong,et al.  An adaptive simulated annealing algorithm , 2001 .

[10]  Matthew Turner,et al.  Control of battery electric vehicle charging for commercial time of day demand rate payers , 2012, 2012 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT).

[11]  M. McIntyre,et al.  Analysis of forecasting algorithms for minimization of electric demand costs for electric vehicle charging in commercial and industrial environments , 2012, 2012 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC).

[12]  G. Heydt,et al.  The Impact of Electric Vehicle Deployment on Load Management Straregies , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[13]  Cecilia R. Aragon,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing: An Experimental Evaluation; Part I, Graph Partitioning , 1989, Oper. Res..

[14]  R. M. Shereef,et al.  Review of demand response under smart grid paradigm , 2011, ISGT2011-India.

[15]  G. Andersson,et al.  Demand Management of Grid Connected Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEV) , 2008, 2008 IEEE Energy 2030 Conference.

[16]  Giri Venkataramanan,et al.  The role of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles in demand response and beyond , 2010, IEEE PES T&D 2010.

[17]  F. Marra,et al.  Demand profile study of battery electric vehicle under different charging options , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[18]  Yue Yuan,et al.  Load model for prediction of electric vehicle charging demand , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Power System Technology.