Lumbar pedicle screw fixation with cortical bone trajectory: A review from anatomical and biomechanical standpoints

Over the past few decades, many attempts to enhance the integrity of the bone-screw interface have been made to prevent pedicle screw failure and to achieve a better clinical outcome when treating a variety of spinal disorders. Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) has been developed as an alternative to the traditional lumbar pedicle screw trajectory. Contrary to the traditional trajectory, which follows the anatomical axis of the pedicle from a lateral starting point, CBT starts at the lateral part of the pars interarticularis and follows a mediolateral and caudocranial screw path through the pedicle. By markedly altering the screw path, CBT has the advantage of achieving a higher level of thread contact with the cortical bone from the dorsal entry point to the vertebral body. Biomechanical studies demonstrated the superior anchoring ability of CBT over the traditional trajectory, even with a shorter and smaller CBT screw. Furthermore, screw insertion from a more medial and caudal starting point requires less exposure and minimizes the procedure-related morbidity, such as reducing damage to the paraspinal muscles, avoiding iatrogenic injury to the cranial facet joint, and maintaining neurovascular supply to the fused segment. Thus, the features of CBT, which enhance screw fixation with limited surgical exposure, have attracted the interest of surgeons as a new minimally invasive method for spinal fusion. The purpose of this study was: 1) to identify the features of the CBT technique by reviewing previous anatomical and biomechanical literature, and 2) to describe its clinical application with a focus on the indications, limitations, surgical technique, and clinical evidence.

[1]  S. S. St. Clair,et al.  Pedicle screw insertion angle and pullout strength: comparison of 2 proposed strategies. , 2011, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[2]  Toshiki Yoshimine,et al.  Significance of the Pars Interarticularis in the Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Technique: An In Vivo Insertional Torque Study , 2016, Asian spine journal.

[3]  L. Lenke,et al.  The biomechanical effect of pedicle screw hubbing on pullout resistance in the thoracic spine. , 2012, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[4]  B. Weiner,et al.  The Lateral Buttress: An Anatomic Feature of the Lumbar Pars Interarticularis , 2002, Spine.

[5]  T. Asazuma,et al.  Morphometric Measurement of Cortical Bone Trajectory for Lumbar Pedicle Screw Insertion Using Computed Tomography , 2013, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[6]  T. Yoshimine,et al.  Clear Zone Formation around Screws in the Early Postoperative Stages after Posterior Lumbar Fusion Using the Cortical Bone Trajectory Technique , 2015, Asian spine journal.

[7]  A. Tsitlakidis,et al.  Clinical outcomes during the learning curve of MIDline Lumbar Fusion (MIDLF®) using the cortical bone trajectory , 2016, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[8]  Xiang-Yang Wang,et al.  Minimally invasive cortical bone trajectory screws placement via pedicle or pedicle rib unit in the lower thoracic spine: a cadaveric and radiographic study , 2016, European Spine Journal.

[9]  J. Street,et al.  Early clinical results with cortically based pedicle screw trajectory for fusion of the degenerative lumbar spine , 2015, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[10]  Alpesh A. Patel,et al.  Differences in bone mineral density of fixation points between lumbar cortical and traditional pedicle screws. , 2016, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[11]  K. Bachus,et al.  Cortical screws used to rescue failed lumbar pedicle screw construct: a biomechanical analysis. , 2015, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[12]  K. Chiba,et al.  Incidence and Risk Factors of Adjacent Cranial Facet Joint Violation Following Pedicle Screw Insertion Using Cortical Bone Trajectory Technique , 2016, Spine.

[13]  O. Danisa,et al.  Early complications after instrumentation of the lumbar spine using cortical bone trajectory technique , 2016, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[14]  S. Cho,et al.  The biomechanics of pedicle screw-based instrumentation. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[15]  George M. Wahba,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Short-Segment Posterior Instrumentation With and Without Crosslinks in a Human Cadaveric Unstable Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Model , 2010, Spine.

[16]  V. Goel,et al.  The Effect of Removing the Lateral Part of the Pars Interarticularis on Stress Distribution at the Neural Arch in Lumbar Foraminal Microdecompression at L3–L4 and L4–L5: Anatomic and Finite Element Investigations , 2007, Spine.

[17]  Paul D. Kim,et al.  An Anatomical Study of the Mid-Lateral Pars Relative to the Pedicle Footprint in the Lower Lumbar Spine , 2009, Spine.

[18]  R. Lehman,et al.  Effect of Various Tapping Diameters on Insertion of Thoracic Pedicle Screws: A Biomechanical Analysis , 2003, Spine.

[19]  Qixin Chen,et al.  Morphometric measurement of the lumbosacral spine for minimally invasive cortical bone trajectory implant using computed tomography , 2016, European Spine Journal.

[20]  Ho-Joong Kim,et al.  The comparison of pedicle screw and cortical screw in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective randomized noninferiority trial. , 2015, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[21]  Yoshiomi Kobayashi,et al.  Cortical bone trajectory and traditional trajectory—a radiological evaluation of screw-bone contact , 2015, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[22]  Serena S. Hu,et al.  Internal fixation in the osteoporotic spine. , 1997, Spine.

[23]  T. Asazuma,et al.  Cortical bone trajectory for lumbosacral fixation: penetrating S-1 endplate screw technique: technical note. , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[24]  T. Washio,et al.  Structural Characteristics of the Pedicle and Its Role in Screw Stability , 1997, Spine.

[25]  K. Chiba,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar pedicle screws in spondylolytic vertebrae: comparison of fixation strength between the traditional trajectory and a cortical bone trajectory. , 2016, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[26]  N. Hosogane,et al.  Cortical Bone Trajectory for Thoracic Pedicle Screws: A Technical Note , 2014, Clinical spine surgery.

[27]  K. Sairyo,et al.  Hybrid technique of cortical bone trajectory and pedicle screwing for minimally invasive spine reconstruction surgery: a technical note. , 2014, The journal of medical investigation : JMI.

[28]  M. Hongo,et al.  Short-Term Results of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Pedicle Screw with Cortical Bone Trajectory Compared with Conventional Trajectory , 2015, Asian spine journal.

[29]  A. Patwardhan,et al.  Effect of Physiological Loads on Cortical and Traditional Pedicle Screw Fixation , 2014, Spine.

[30]  O. Danisa,et al.  Pars and pedicle fracture and screw loosening associated with cortical bone trajectory: a case series and proposed mechanism through a cadaveric study. , 2016, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[31]  Hironobu Sakaura,et al.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparative study. , 2016, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[32]  T. Yoshimine,et al.  Isthmus‐guided Cortical Bone Trajectory for Pedicle Screw Insertion , 2014, Orthopaedic surgery.

[33]  N. Hosogane,et al.  Comparison of Pedicle Screw Fixation Strength Among Different Transpedicular Trajectories: A Finite Element Study , 2015, Clinical spine surgery.

[34]  C. Puttlitz,et al.  Pedicle screw placement in the lumbar spine: effect of trajectory and screw design on acute biomechanical purchase. , 2015, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[35]  N. Khanna,et al.  Medialized, Muscle-Splitting Approach for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique and Multicenter Perioperative Results , 2016, Spine.

[36]  Che-Wei Hung,et al.  Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with conventional and cortical bone trajectory , 2016, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[37]  N. Hosogane,et al.  Evaluation of the Fixation Strength of Pedicle Screws Using Cortical Bone Trajectory: What Is the Ideal Trajectory for Optimal Fixation? , 2015, Spine.

[38]  K. Chin,et al.  Clinical Outcomes With Midline Cortical Bone Trajectory Pedicle Screws Versus Traditional Pedicle Screws in Moving Lumbar Fusions From Hospitals to Outpatient Surgery Centers , 2017, Clinical spine surgery.

[39]  David P Fyhrie,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of differing pedicle screw insertion angles. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[40]  N. Hosogane,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of the fixation strength of lumbar pedicle screws using cortical bone trajectory: a finite element study. , 2015, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[41]  B. Cunningham,et al.  Biomechanical fixation properties of cortical versus transpedicular screws in the osteoporotic lumbar spine: an in vitro human cadaveric model. , 2016, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[42]  M. Panjabi,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Lumbar Spinal Stability After Graded Facetectomies , 1990, Spine.

[43]  C. Puttlitz,et al.  Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. , 2009, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[44]  Y. Akpolat,et al.  Fatigue Performance of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Compared With Standard Trajectory Pedicle Screw , 2016, Spine.

[45]  T. Asazuma,et al.  In Vivo Analysis of Insertional Torque During Pedicle Screwing Using Cortical Bone Trajectory Technique , 2014, Spine.

[46]  N. Crawford,et al.  Biomechanics of Lumbar Cortical Screw–Rod Fixation Versus Pedicle Screw–Rod Fixation With and Without Interbody Support , 2013, Spine.

[47]  K. Chiba,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of fixation strength among different sizes of pedicle screws using the cortical bone trajectory: what is the ideal screw size for optimal fixation? , 2016, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[48]  Ali Kiapour,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of Various Footprints of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices , 2014, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[49]  A. Shimano,et al.  Effect of pilot hole on biomechanical and in vivo pedicle screw–bone interface , 2013, European Spine Journal.

[50]  N. Khanna,et al.  Medialized , Muscle-Splitting Approach for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cop , 2016 .

[51]  K. Nishizawa,et al.  Short-Term Clinical Result of Cortical Bone Trajectory Technique for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis with More than 1-Year Follow-Up , 2016, Asian spine journal.

[52]  Choll W. Kim,et al.  Nerve Injury to the Posterior Rami Medial Branch During the Insertion of Pedicle Screws: Comparison of Mini-Open Versus Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion Techniques , 2009, Spine.