Constructing the market position of a project-based firm

Abstract Project marketing research has shown that project-based firms (PBFs) can favorably differentiate themselves from their competitors by developing a strong functional position and a strong relational position in a specific market milieu. Combined, these two interrelated positions constitute the market position of a project-based firm, and inter-organizational relationships (IORs) between a PBF and other actors in the milieu play an important role in its development. Active development of IORs to key actors simultaneously increases the effectiveness of the focal PBF in delivering solutions to its customers (functional position) and simultaneously enables it to occupy a stronger position in the milieu linking it to its customers (relational position). We present evidence from an empirical case focusing on how an automation system supplier gradually constructed a strong market position in the Russian oil and gas industry.

[1]  Florence Crespin-Mazet,et al.  Co-development as a marketing strategy in the construction industry , 2007 .

[2]  R. Eccles The quasifirm in the construction industry , 1981 .

[3]  P. Ghauri,et al.  Project Marketing: Beyond Competitive Bidding , 2002 .

[4]  Tuomas Ahola Efficiency in project networks : the role of inter-organizational relationships in project implementation , 2009 .

[5]  J. C. Flanagan Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .

[6]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Supply strategy and network effects — purchasing behaviour in the construction industry , 2000 .

[7]  Bernard Cova,et al.  Six key points to merge project marketing into project management , 2005 .

[8]  J. Sydow,et al.  Project Networks and Changing Industry Practices Collaborative Content Production in the German Television Industry , 2001 .

[9]  Jaakko Kujala,et al.  A stakeholder network perspective on unexpected events and their management in international projects , 2010 .

[10]  Karlos Artto,et al.  Subcontractors' business relationships as risk sources in project networks , 2008 .

[11]  C. Locatelli The Russian oil industry restructuration: towards the emergence of western type enterprises? , 1999 .

[12]  David M. Waguespack,et al.  Social Structure and Exchange: Self-confirming Dynamics in Hollywood , 2006 .

[13]  Karlos Artto,et al.  The marketing strategy of a project-based firm: The Four Portfolios Framework , 2007 .

[14]  Torbjörn Stjernberg,et al.  Design and implementation in major investments -- A project network approach , 1995 .

[15]  Henrikki Tikkanen,et al.  Relationships and project marketing success , 2002 .

[16]  K. Artto,et al.  Impact of services on project business , 2008 .

[17]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[18]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  The Shadow Of The Future: Effects Of Anticipated Interaction And Frequency Of Contact On Buyer-Seller Cooperation , 1992 .

[19]  S. Manning Embedding Projects in Multiple Contexts: A Structuration Perspective , 2010 .

[20]  Amjad Hadjikhani,et al.  Project marketing and the management of discontinuity , 1996 .

[21]  Diego Rinallo,et al.  Ongoing search among industrial buyers , 2006 .

[22]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  On the Nature, Formation, and Maintenance of Relations Among Organizations , 1976 .

[23]  Tuomas Ahola,et al.  Purchasing strategies and value creation in industrial turnkey projects , 2008 .

[24]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[25]  Udo Staber,et al.  The Institutional Embeddedness of Project Networks: The Case of Content Production in German Television , 2002 .

[26]  S. Stiegelbauer Through the Eye of the Beholder: On the Use of Qualitative Methods in Data Analysis. , 1982 .

[27]  M. Martinsuo,et al.  Supplier integration in complex delivery projects: comparison between different buyer-supplier relationships , 2010, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[28]  J. Kujala,et al.  Use of services to support the business of a project-based firm , 2013, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[29]  A. Kadefors Trust in project relationships-inside the black box , 2004 .

[30]  Bernard Cova,et al.  Introduction to the IMM special issue on ‘Project marketing and the marketing of solutions’ A comprehensive approach to project marketing and the marketing of solutions , 2007 .

[31]  J. Johanson,et al.  Interorganizational relations in industrial systems: a network approach compared with the transaction cost approach , 1987 .

[32]  Bernard Cova,et al.  A twin-track networking approach to project marketing , 1997 .

[33]  M. Hobday,et al.  Innovation in Complex Systems Industries: the Case of Flight Simulation , 1995 .

[34]  Bernard Cova,et al.  Rituals in managing extrabusiness relationships in international project marketing: a conceptual framework , 2000 .

[35]  Kirsi Aaltonen,et al.  Response strategies to stakeholder pressures in global projects , 2009 .

[36]  Bernard Cova,et al.  Shaping Projects, Building Networks , 2011 .