The ethics of conducting a co-operative inquiry with vulnerable people.

BACKGROUND Mental health services users have been calling for greater participation in clinical research. Participation in this context means research 'with' rather than 'on' groups of people. Conducting a co-operative inquiry involving the participation of vulnerable individuals as co-researchers, in particular those with a history of mental health problems, places an obligation on researchers to articulate and justify sound ethical procedures. AIMS The aim of this paper is to consider how the ethical issues encountered when conducting participative research with vulnerable people can be addressed in the implementation of a co-operative inquiry with users of mental health services. METHOD The study was based on personal reflection and a critical review of associated literature obtained from a database search using Boolean logic. FINDINGS The findings, presented under the headings of the four prima facie moral principles, suggest the need for researchers using participative approaches to demonstrate the humanistic attributes required for engaging and working with people over a period of time. These include building and maintaining trusting relationships, assessing competence to participate, managing interpersonal and group dynamics and making complex collaborative decisions about participants' continued participation in a study. CONCLUSIONS When using a co-operative inquiry approach involving vulnerable individuals, researchers need to demonstrate clearly how a balance between autonomy and paternalism will be achieved, how risks will be anticipated and managed and how fairness will be maintained throughout all procedures. Researchers using participative approaches need to have developed a level of personal insight and self-awareness through access to supervision which focuses on sources of unintended manipulation and interpersonal dynamics that may arise at the inception of a study and throughout its course. Researchers and ethics committees have a shared responsibility to ensure that vulnerable people are appropriately engaged to maintain the advancement of user knowledge which informs nursing practice.

[1]  J. Overall,et al.  The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale , 1962 .

[2]  A. Lautin,et al.  Preliminary findings on psychiatric patients as research participants: a population at risk? , 1981, The American journal of psychiatry.

[3]  B. Stanley,et al.  Drs. Stanley and Stanley Reply , 1981 .

[4]  M. Baum,et al.  Ethics of clinical research: lessons for the future. , 1989, BMJ.

[5]  P. Appelbaum,et al.  The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. II , 1995, Law and human behavior.

[6]  A. Macfarlane,et al.  Ethics approval for a national postal survey: recent experience , 1995, BMJ.

[7]  I. Holloway,et al.  Ethical Issues in Qualitative Nursing Research , 1995, Nursing ethics.

[8]  Thomas Grisso,et al.  Mental Illness and Competence to Consent to Treatment , 1995 .

[9]  P. Appelbaum,et al.  Constructing competence: formulating standards of legal competence to make medical decisions. , 1996, Rutgers law review.

[10]  P. Appelbaum,et al.  The MacCAT-T: a clinical tool to assess patients' capacities to make treatment decisions. , 1997, Psychiatric services.

[11]  J. Repper,et al.  Struggling for control: the care experiences of 'difficult' patients in mental health services. , 1998, Journal of advanced nursing.

[12]  D J Kupfer,et al.  Competence of depressed patients for consent to research. , 1999, The American journal of psychiatry.

[13]  T. Hostick,et al.  'Partnership': a co-operative inquiry between community mental health nurses and their clients. 1. Research methodology, process and reflections. , 2000, Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing.

[14]  M. Sque,et al.  Researching the Bereaved: an investigator’s experience , 2000, Nursing ethics.

[15]  E. Latvala,et al.  Applying Ethical Guidelines in Nursing Research on People with mental illness , 2001, Nursing ethics.

[16]  S. Owen The practical, methodological and ethical dilemmas of conducting focus groups with vulnerable clients. , 2001, Journal of advanced nursing.

[17]  P. Ramcharan,et al.  Judging the ethics of qualitative research: considering the "ethics as process" model. , 2001, Health & social care in the community.

[18]  Jane S. Paulsen,et al.  Capacity to provide informed consent for participation in schizophrenia and HIV research. , 2002, The American journal of psychiatry.

[19]  E. Caine,et al.  Impaired decision-making ability in subjects with Alzheimer's disease and willingness to participate in research. , 2002, The American journal of psychiatry.