Construct Validity of the Physical Function Scale of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire for the Measurement of Walking Capacity

Study Design. Measurement (validity) study using data from a prospective longitudinal study of lumbar spinal stenosis. Objective. Provide convergent and divergent validity evidence for the use of the Physical Function Scale of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire for the measurement of walking capacity in persons with lumbar spinal stenosis. We were also interested in the association between the Physical Function Scale and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Summary of Background Data. The Physical Function Scale has been used to assess walking capacity in persons with lumbar spinal stenosis; however, there have been limited studies investigating its psychometric properties. No validity studies have compared the Physical Function Scale and the ODI head to head. Methods. The Physical Function Scale was correlated with the ODI, Health Utilities Index, Centres for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Medical Outcomes Survey Social Support Scale, and an additional item from the Oxford Claudication Score. Results. As hypothesized, the Physical Function Scale was correlated highly with those instruments and items intended to measure walking capacity and minimally with those instruments intended to measure different constructs. The correlation between the Physical Function Scale and the ODI was r = 0.719. Conclusion. Results support construct validity of the Physical Function Scale for the measurement of walking in an lumbar spinal stenosis population. However, it cannot be ascertained from the current study that the construct being measured is, indeed, walking capacity. Further research is warranted to investigate criterion validity evidence for the use of the Physical Function Scale in the measurement of walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis, by examining the relationships between self-report and observational measures of walking.

[1]  S. Savolainen,et al.  Somatic comorbidity and younger age are associated with life dissatisfaction among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis before surgical treatment , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[2]  Y. Iwasaki,et al.  An Interspinous Process Distractor (X STOP) for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Elderly Patients: Preliminary Experiences in 10 Consecutive Cases , 2004, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[3]  M. Battié,et al.  Construct Validity of a Kinesiophysical Functional Capacity Evaluation Administered Within a Worker's Compensation Environment , 2003, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[4]  K. Ohzono,et al.  Correlation of Patient Satisfaction with Symptom Severity and Walking Ability after Surgical Treatment for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 2003, Spine.

[5]  M. Szpalski,et al.  The conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly , 2003, European Spine Journal.

[6]  T. Keller,et al.  Clinical and psychofunctional measures of conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort study , 2003, European Spine Journal.

[7]  Brett Hanscom,et al.  Is a Condition-Specific Instrument for Patients with Low Back Pain/Leg Symptoms Really Necessary?: The Responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36 , 2003, Spine.

[8]  M. Nyska,et al.  Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in patients aged 65 years and older. , 2002, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[9]  A. Mcgregor,et al.  The Evaluation of the Surgical Management of Nerve Root Compression in Patients with Low Back Pain: Part 1: The Assessment of Outcome , 2002, Spine.

[10]  J. Fairbank,et al.  The Reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the Assessment of Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 2002, Spine.

[11]  J. Katz,et al.  Examination findings and self-reported walking capacity in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2001, Physical therapy.

[12]  A. Simotas Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  F. Cammisa,et al.  Decompressive Surgery for Typical Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  J. Hall,et al.  Decompression, Fusion, and Instrumentation Surgery for Complex Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  R. Zimmerman,et al.  Test-retest reproducibility of the exercise treadmill examination in lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2000, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[16]  L. Lenke,et al.  Prospective functional evaluation of the surgical treatment of neurogenic claudication in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[17]  F. Cammisa,et al.  Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Clinical and Outcome Results and a 3-Year Survivorship Analysis , 2000, Spine.

[18]  O. Airaksinen,et al.  Computed tomography findings 4 years after surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. No correlation with clinical outcome. , 1999, Spine.

[19]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. , 1999, Spine.

[20]  O. Airaksinen,et al.  Long-term clinical and magnetic resonance imaging follow-up assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis after laminectomy. , 1999, Spine.

[21]  O. Airaksinen,et al.  The degree of decompressive relief and its relation to clinical outcome in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. , 1999, Spine.

[22]  O. Airaksinen,et al.  Surgical Outcome of 438 Patients Treated Surgically for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 1997, Spine.

[23]  A. Fossel,et al.  Associations Between Spinal Deformity and Outcomes After Decompression For Spinal Stenosis , 1997, Spine.

[24]  Robert A. Lew,et al.  Lumbar Laminectomy Alone or With Instrumented or Noninstrumented Arthrodesis in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Patient Selection, Costs, and Surgical Outcomes , 1997, Spine.

[25]  A. Beurskens,et al.  Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments , 1996, Pain.

[26]  M. Liang,et al.  Measurement Properties of a Self‐Administered Outcome Measure in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 1996, Spine.

[27]  M. Liang,et al.  Seven‐ to 10‐year Outcome of Decompressive Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 1996, Spine.

[28]  M. Liang,et al.  Relative responsiveness of condition-specific and generic health status measures in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[29]  J. Katz,et al.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Diagnostic value of the history and physical examination. , 1995, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[30]  O. Airaksinen,et al.  Surgical Results of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Comparison of Patients With or Without Previous Back Surgery , 1995, Spine.

[31]  O. Airaksinen,et al.  Computed Tomography After Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Patients' Pain Patterns, Waliking Capacity, and Subjective Disability Had No Correlation With Computed Tomography Findings , 1994, Spine.

[32]  M. Hupli,et al.  Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients. , 1993, The Clinical journal of pain.

[33]  J C Fairbank,et al.  The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. , 1980, Physiotherapy.

[34]  L. Radloff The CES-D Scale , 1977 .

[35]  Leon Straker,et al.  Validity of work-related assessments. , 1999, Work.

[36]  O. Airaksinen,et al.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: a matched-pair study of operated and non-operated patients. , 1996, British journal of neurosurgery.

[37]  G W Torrance,et al.  Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index. , 1995, PharmacoEconomics.

[38]  A. Herno Surgical results of lumbar spinal stenosis. , 1995, Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae. Supplementum.

[39]  J. Katz,et al.  Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis. , 1994, Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America.

[40]  Elizabeth Domholdt,et al.  Physical Therapy Research: Principles and Applications , 1993 .