A Dynamic Mixture Model to Detect Student Motivation and Proficiency

Unmotivated students do not reap the full rewards of using a computer-based intelligent tutoring system. Detection of improper behavior is thus an important component of an online student model. To meet this challenge, we present a dynamic mixture model based on Item Response Theory. This model, which simultaneously estimates a student's proficiency and changing motivation level, was tested with data of high school students using a geometry tutoring system. By accounting for student motivation, the dynamic mixture model can more accurately estimate proficiency and the probability of a correct response. The model's generality is an added benefit, making it applicable to many intelligent tutoring systems as well as other domains.

[1]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[2]  R. D. Bock,et al.  Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm , 1981 .

[3]  L. Collins,et al.  Latent Class Models for Stage-Sequential Dynamic Latent Variables , 1992 .

[4]  F. Baker,et al.  Item response theory : parameter estimation techniques , 1993 .

[5]  R. Hambleton,et al.  Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory , 1997 .

[6]  H. Pain,et al.  A computational model of Affective Educational Dialogues , 2000 .

[7]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Variational Learning for Switching State-Space Models , 2001 .

[8]  Antonija Mitrovic,et al.  Optimising ITS Behaviour with Bayesian Networks and Decision Theory , 2001 .

[9]  Cristina Conati,et al.  Probabilistic assessment of user's emotions in educational games , 2002, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[10]  Helen Pain,et al.  Informing the Detection of the Students' Motivational State: An Empirical Study , 2002, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[11]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Off-task behavior in the cognitive tutor classroom: when students "game the system" , 2004, CHI.

[12]  Beverly Park Woolf,et al.  Web-Based Intelligent Multimedia Tutoring for High Stakes Achievement Tests , 2004, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[13]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Detecting Student Misuse of Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2004, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[14]  Christine E. DeMars,et al.  Low Examinee Effort in Low-Stakes Assessment: Problems and Potential Solutions , 2005 .

[15]  Joseph E. Beck,et al.  Engagement tracing: using response times to model student disengagement , 2005, AIED.

[16]  Beverly Park Woolf,et al.  Inferring learning and attitudes from a Bayesian Network of log file data , 2005, AIED.

[17]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  The Andes Physics Tutoring System: Lessons Learned , 2005, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..