E-leadership effectiveness in virtual teams: motivating language perspective

Purpose – Virtual teams are becoming a norm in current knowledge-based society and offer a wide range of organizational benefits. This paper aims to investigate the effects of leaders’ motivating language (ML) and feedback approach on virtual team members’ creativity performance. Design/methodology/approach – A 2×2 with pre-test and post-test experimental design was employed to explore how to stimulate virtual team members’ creativity performance using a group decision support system. Findings – The results show that leaders’ ML and feedback approach via e-mail instructions have different interaction effects on members’ creativity and idea generation performance. Team members receiving direction-giving instructions generate more ideas under the demanding feedback approach and team member receiving instructions with more empathetic language exhibit higher creativity performance under the encouraging feedback approach. Research limitations/implications – Shortcomings of virtual environment and leadership re...

[1]  J. Mayfield,et al.  The Benefits of Leader Communication On Part-Time Worker Outcomes: A Comparison Between Part-Time and Full-Time Employees Using Motivating Language , 2006, Journal of Business Strategies.

[2]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[3]  J. Sullivan Three Roles of Language in Motivation Theory , 1988 .

[4]  Allen S. Lee Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation , 1994, MIS Q..

[5]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work , 1996 .

[6]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Virtual Teams versus Face-to-Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web-based Conference System* , 1997 .

[7]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do , 1997 .

[8]  John J. Sosik,et al.  Inspiring Group Creativity , 1998 .

[9]  Mark J. Martinko,et al.  The effects of performance attributions and outcome dependence on leader feedback behavior following poor subordinate performance , 1998 .

[10]  B. Bass,et al.  Re‐examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership , 1999 .

[11]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[12]  Vicki L. Goodwin,et al.  A laboratory experiment testing the antecedents of leader cognitions , 2000 .

[13]  S. Kahai,et al.  E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice , 2000 .

[14]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Building A Global Learning Community , 2001, CACM.

[15]  Sumita Raghuram,et al.  Organizational identification among virtual workers: the role of need for affiliation and perceived work-based social support , 2001 .

[16]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Leadership Effectiveness in Global Virtual Teams , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Ching-Wen Wang,et al.  The Effects of Creative Problem Solving Training on Creativity, Cognitive Type and R&D Performance , 2002 .

[18]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Creativity under the gun. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[19]  D. Pauleen Leadership in a global virtual team: an action learning approach , 2003 .

[20]  Susan J. Ashford,et al.  Reflections on the Looking Glass: A Review of Research on Feedback-Seeking Behavior in Organizations: , 2003 .

[21]  John J. Sosik,et al.  Effects of leadership style, anonymity, and rewards on creativity-relevant processes and outcomes in an electronic meeting system context , 2003 .

[22]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[23]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2004 .

[24]  T. Judge,et al.  Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analysis. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  Ned Kock,et al.  Trust and leadership in virtual teamwork: A media naturalness perspective , 2004 .

[26]  Antonio Chirumbolo,et al.  Effects of need for closure on creativity in small group interactions , 2004 .

[27]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Leader Behaviors and the Work Environment for Creativity: Perceived Leader Support , 2004 .

[28]  R.J. Ocker,et al.  Influences on creativity in asynchronous virtual teams: a qualitative analysis of experimental teams , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[29]  Benson Rosen,et al.  Training for virtual teams: An investigation of current practices and future needs , 2006 .

[30]  J. Mayfield,et al.  The Effects of Leader Communication on a Worker's Intent to Stay: An Investigation Using Structural Equation Modeling , 2007 .

[31]  A. Majchrzak,et al.  Leading Virtual Teams , 2007 .

[32]  Minder Chen,et al.  TeamSpirit: Design, implementation, and evaluation of a Web-based group decision support system , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[33]  Paul E. Levy,et al.  The Development of a Feedback Environment and Role Clarity Model of Job Performance , 2007 .

[34]  Theresa J. B. Kline,et al.  Virtual Team Leadership: Perspectives From the Field , 2007, Int. J. e Collab..

[35]  Milton Mayfield,et al.  Leadership techniques for nurturing worker garden variety creativity , 2008 .

[36]  Michelle LaBrosse,et al.  Managing virtual teams , 2008 .

[37]  Francis Amagoh,et al.  Leadership development and leadership effectiveness , 2009 .

[38]  Julia Brandl,et al.  Applying cognitive adjustment theory to cross-cultural training for global virtual teams , 2009 .

[39]  D. S. Derue,et al.  Leadership in Teams: A Functional Approach to Understanding Leadership Structures and Processes , 2010 .

[40]  J. Mayfield,et al.  Leader‐level influence on motivating language: A two‐level model investigation on worker performance and job satisfaction , 2010 .

[41]  Linda Duxbury,et al.  Conceptualizing and measuring the virtuality of teams , 2010, Inf. Syst. J..

[42]  M. Hargis,et al.  Developing Leaders: Examining the Role of Transactional and Transformational Leadership across Business Contexts , 2011 .

[43]  A. Zimmermann Interpersonal Relationships in Transnational, Virtual Teams: Towards a Configurational Perspective , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[44]  Leif Jarle Gressgård Virtual team collaboration and innovation in organizations , 2011 .

[45]  D. Mukherjee,et al.  Leading virtual teams: how do social, cognitive, and behavioral capabilities matter? , 2012 .

[46]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  A meta-analysis of the consequences of virtualness on team functioning , 2012, Inf. Manag..

[47]  Paul E. Madlock The influence of motivational language in the technologically mediated realm of telecommuters , 2013 .