Resistance to bribery when aggregating soft constraints
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Toby Walsh,et al. Winner determination in voting trees with incomplete preferences and weighted votes , 2011, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.
[2] Maria Silvia Pini,et al. Bribery in Voting Over Combinatorial Domains Is Easy , 2012, ISAIM.
[3] Ronen I. Brafman,et al. Finding the Next Solution in Constraint- and Preference-Based Knowledge Representation Formalisms , 2010, KR.
[4] Piotr Faliszewski,et al. Nonuniform Bribery , 2007, AAMAS.
[5] M. Trick,et al. The computational difficulty of manipulating an election , 1989 .
[6] Francesca Rossi,et al. Multi-Agent Soft Constraint Aggregation via Sequential Voting , 2011, IJCAI.
[7] K. Arrow,et al. Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare , 2011 .
[8] Lirong Xia,et al. Sequential composition of voting rules in multi-issue domains , 2009, Math. Soc. Sci..
[9] Francesca Rossi,et al. Multi-agent Soft Constraint Aggregation - A Sequential Approach , 2011, ICAART.
[10] Ravindra K. Ahuja,et al. Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications , 1993 .
[11] R. Dechter,et al. Inference Schemes for M Best Solutions for Soft CSPs , 2011 .
[12] Francesca Rossi,et al. Bribery in voting with CP-nets , 2013, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.
[13] Piotr Faliszewski,et al. How Hard Is Bribery in Elections? , 2006, J. Artif. Intell. Res..
[14] Toby Walsh,et al. Handbook of Constraint Programming , 2006, Handbook of Constraint Programming.
[15] Vincent Conitzer,et al. When are elections with few candidates hard to manipulate? , 2007, J. ACM.
[16] Michael R. Fellows,et al. On complexity of lobbying in multiple referenda , 2006 .
[17] Toby Walsh,et al. Incompleteness and incomparability in preference aggregation: Complexity results , 2011, Artif. Intell..