Sexual selection protects against extinction

Reproduction through sex carries substantial costs, mainly because only half of sexual adults produce offspring. It has been theorized that these costs could be countered if sex allows sexual selection to clear the universal fitness constraint of mutation load. Under sexual selection, competition between (usually) males and mate choice by (usually) females create important intraspecific filters for reproductive success, so that only a subset of males gains paternity. If reproductive success under sexual selection is dependent on individual condition, which is contingent to mutation load, then sexually selected filtering through ‘genic capture’ could offset the costs of sex because it provides genetic benefits to populations. Here we test this theory experimentally by comparing whether populations with histories of strong versus weak sexual selection purge mutation load and resist extinction differently. After evolving replicate populations of the flour beetle Tribolium castaneum for 6 to 7 years under conditions that differed solely in the strengths of sexual selection, we revealed mutation load using inbreeding. Lineages from populations that had previously experienced strong sexual selection were resilient to extinction and maintained fitness under inbreeding, with some families continuing to survive after 20 generations of sib × sib mating. By contrast, lineages derived from populations that experienced weak or non-existent sexual selection showed rapid fitness declines under inbreeding, and all were extinct after generation 10. Multiple mutations across the genome with individually small effects can be difficult to clear, yet sum to a significant fitness load; our findings reveal that sexual selection reduces this load, improving population viability in the face of genetic stress.

[1]  J. B. S. Haldane,et al.  The Effect of Variation of Fitness , 1937, The American Naturalist.

[2]  D. Falconer,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1962 .

[3]  C. Darwin On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection: Or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 2019 .

[4]  J. M. Smith Evolution of sex , 1975, Nature.

[5]  W. Rice SEX CHROMOSOMES AND THE EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  M. Soulé,et al.  Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity , 1987 .

[7]  R. Lande Genetics and demography in biological conservation. , 1988, Science.

[8]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. , 1999, Genetical research.

[9]  W. Rice,et al.  Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Sexual selection and the maintenance of sexual reproduction , 2001, Nature.

[11]  S. Siller,et al.  Sexual selection and the maintenance of sex , 2001, Nature.

[12]  M. Lynch,et al.  TOWARD A REALISTIC MODEL OF MUTATIONS AFFECTING FITNESS , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[13]  TOWARD A REALISTIC MODEL OF MUTATIONS AFFECTING FITNESS , 2003 .

[14]  FEMALE RESISTANCE TO MALE HARM EVOLVES IN RESPONSE TO MANIPULATION OF SEXUAL CONFLICT , 2004 .

[15]  J. Radwan Effectiveness of sexual selection in removing mutations induced with ionizing radiation , 2004 .

[16]  J. L. Tomkins,et al.  Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Mating Density and the Strength of Sexual Selection Against Deleterious Alleles in Drosophila melanogaster , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  M. Whitlock,et al.  Purging the Genome with Sexual Selection: Reducing Mutation Load Through Selection on Males , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  Janna L. Fierst,et al.  SEXUAL SELECTION ACCELERATES THE ELIMINATION OF A DELETERIOUS MUTANT IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  Doina Caragea,et al.  BeetleBase in 2010: revisions to provide comprehensive genomic information for Tribolium castaneum , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[21]  L. Excoffier,et al.  Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows , 2010, Molecular ecology resources.

[22]  Alyson J. Lumley,et al.  Inbreeding Promotes Female Promiscuity , 2011, Science.

[23]  D. Houle,et al.  Populations with elevated mutation load do not benefit from the operation of sexual selection , 2011, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[24]  Alyson J. Lumley,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL EVOLUTION EXPOSES FEMALE AND MALE RESPONSES TO SEXUAL SELECTION AND CONFLICT IN TRIBOLIUM CASTANEUM , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  H. Rundle,et al.  SEXUAL SELECTION IS INEFFECTUAL OR INHIBITS THE PURGING OF DELETERIOUS MUTATIONS IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  L. Rowe,et al.  The Effect of Sexual Selection on Offspring Fitness Depends on the Nature of Genetic Variation , 2012, Current Biology.

[27]  John Sibert,et al.  AD Model Builder: using automatic differentiation for statistical inference of highly parameterized complex nonlinear models , 2012, Optim. Methods Softw..

[28]  M. Whitlock,et al.  Mutation Load: The Fitness of Individuals in Populations Where Deleterious Alleles Are Abundant , 2012 .

[29]  Kenny Q. Ye,et al.  An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes , 2012, Nature.

[30]  H. Kokko,et al.  The consequences of polyandry for population viability, extinction risk and conservation , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  Ł. Michalczyk,et al.  Experimental Removal of Sexual Selection Reveals Adaptations to Polyandry in Both Sexes , 2013, Evolutionary Biology.

[32]  P. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package) , 2014 .

[33]  L. Keller,et al.  Evolution under monogamy feminizes gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster , 2014, Nature Communications.

[34]  L. Simmons,et al.  SEXUAL SELECTION CAN REMOVE AN EXPERIMENTALLY INDUCED MUTATION LOAD , 2014, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .