Restoring Lost Cognitive Function Hippocampal-Cortical Neural Prostheses

O ne of the frontiers in the biomedical sciences is the development of prostheses for the central nervous system (CNS) to replace higher thought processes that have been lost due to damage or disease. Prosthetic systems that interact with the CNS are currently being developed by several groups [1], though virtually all other CNS prostheses focus on sensory or motor system dysfunction and not on restoring cog-nitive loss resulting from damage to central brain regions. Systems designed to compensate for the loss of sensory input attempt to replace the transduction of physical energy from the environment into electrical stimulation of sensory nerve fibers (e.g., a cochlear implant or artificial retina) or the sensory cortex [2]–[4]. Systems designed to compensate for the loss of motor control do so through functional electrical stimulation (FES), in which preprogrammed stimulation protocols are used to activate muscular movement [5], [6], or by decoding premotor/motor cortical commands for the control of robotic systems [7]–[9]. The type of neural prosthesis that performs or assists a cognitive function is qualitatively different from the cochlear implant, artificial retina, or FES. We consider here a prosthetic device that functions in a biomimetic manner to replace information transmission between cortical brain regions [10], [11]. In such a prosthesis, damaged CNS neu-rons would be replaced with a biomimetic system comprised of silicon neurons. The replacement silicon neurons would have functional properties specific to those of the damaged neurons and would both receive as inputs and send as outputs electrical activity to regions of the brain with which the damaged region previously communicated (Figure 1). Thus, the class of prosthesis being proposed is one that would replace the computational function of the damaged brain and restore the transmission of that computational result to other regions of the nervous system. Such a new generation of neural prostheses would have a profound impact on the quality of life throughout society; it would offer a biomed-ical remedy for the cognitive and memory loss accompanying Alzheimer's disease, the speech and language deficits resulting from stroke, and the impaired ability to execute skilled movements following trauma to brain regions responsible for motor control. We are in the process of developing such a cognitive prosthe-sis for the hippocampus, a region of the brain involved in the formation of new long-term memories. The hippocampus is responsible for what have been termed long-term declarative or recognition memories [12]–[18]: the formation of …

[1]  N. Wiener,et al.  Nonlinear Problems in Random Theory , 1964 .

[2]  B. Milner MEMORY AND THE MEDIAL TEMPORAL REGIONS OF THE BRAIN , 1970 .

[3]  M. Eckardt The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map , 1980 .

[4]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Single-unit analysis of different hippocampal cell types during classical conditioning of rabbit nictitating membrane response. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  K. Mauritz,et al.  Restoration of grasping functions in quadriplegic patients by Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) , 1987, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[6]  T. Berger,et al.  Nonlinear systems analysis of the hippocampal perforant path-dentate projection. III. Comparison of random train and paired impulse stimulation. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  T. Berger,et al.  Nonlinear systems analysis of the hippocampal perforant path-dentate projection. I. Theoretical and interpretational considerations. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  T. Berger,et al.  Nonlinear systems analysis of the hippocampal perforant path-dentate projection. II. Effects of random impulse train stimulation. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  D. Amaral,et al.  The three-dimensional organization of the hippocampal formation: A review of anatomical data , 1989, Neuroscience.

[10]  G. Loeb Cochlear prosthetics. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  Theodore W. Berger,et al.  Modeling of neuronal networks through experimental decomposition , 1991 .

[12]  Theodore W. Berger,et al.  A biologically based model of functional properties of the hippocampus , 1994, Neural Networks.

[13]  R E Hampson,et al.  Hippocampal ensemble activity during spatial delayed-nonmatch-to-sample performance in rats , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  L. Squire,et al.  Episodic memory, semantic memory, and amnesia , 1998, Hippocampus.

[15]  Robert E. Hampson,et al.  Distribution of spatial and nonspatial information in dorsal hippocampus , 1999, Nature.

[16]  H. Eichenbaum The hippocampus and mechanisms of declarative memory , 1999, Behavioural Brain Research.

[17]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Hippocampus as a memory map: Synaptic plasticity and memory encoding by hippocampal neurons , 1999, Hippocampus.

[18]  J. Weiland,et al.  Pattern electrical stimulation of the human retina , 1999, Vision Research.

[19]  Theodore W. Berger,et al.  A novel network for nonlinear modeling of neural systems with arbitrary point-process inputs , 2000, Neural Networks.

[20]  G E Loeb,et al.  BION system for distributed neural prosthetic interfaces. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[21]  Eduardo Fernandez,et al.  High-resolution spatio-temporal mapping of visual pathways using multi-electrode arrays , 2001, Vision Research.

[22]  Bing J. Sheu,et al.  Brain-implantable biomimetic electronics as the next era in neural prosthetics , 2001, Proc. IEEE.

[23]  T. Berger,et al.  Contribution of T‐type VDCC to TEA‐induced long‐term synaptic modification in hippocampal CA1 and dentate gyrus , 2002, Hippocampus.

[24]  Dong Song,et al.  Contribution of NMDA receptor channels to the expression of LTP in the hippocampal dentate gyrus , 2002, Hippocampus.

[25]  John P. Donoghue,et al.  Connecting cortex to machines: recent advances in brain interfaces , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  Theodore W. Berger,et al.  Brain-implantable biomimetic electronics as neural prosthetics , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[27]  R. Andersen,et al.  Neural prosthetic control signals from plan activity , 2003, Neuroreport.

[28]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Brain–machine interfaces to restore motor function and probe neural circuits , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  Theodore W. Berger,et al.  Characterization of the short-term plasticity of the dentate gyrus-CA3 system using nonlinear systems analysis , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[30]  J. Born,et al.  Declarative memory consolidation: mechanisms acting during human sleep. , 2004, Learning & memory.

[31]  T. Bliss,et al.  Lamellar organization of hippocampal excitatory pathways , 1971, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  Theodore W. Berger,et al.  A systems theoretic approach to the study of CNS function , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  V. Marmarelis Identification of nonlinear biological systems using laguerre expansions of kernels , 1993, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  P. Z. Marmarelis,et al.  Analysis of Physiological Systems: The White-Noise Approach , 2011 .