Visualizing Data using t-SNE

We present a new technique called “t-SNE” that visualizes high-dimensional data by giving each datapoint a location in a two or three-dimensional map. The technique is a variation of Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (Hinton and Roweis, 2002) that is much easier to optimize, and produces significantly better visualizations by reducing the tendency to crowd points together in the center of the map. t-SNE is better than existing techniques at creating a single map that reveals structure at many different scales. This is particularly important for high-dimensional data that lie on several different, but related, low-dimensional manifolds, such as images of objects from multiple classes seen from multiple viewpoints. For visualizing the structure of very large datasets, we show how t-SNE can use random walks on neighborhood graphs to allow the implicit structure of all of the data to influence the way in which a subset of the data is displayed. We illustrate the performance of t-SNE on a wide variety of datasets and compare it with many other non-parametric visualization techniques, including Sammon mapping, Isomap, and Locally Linear Embedding. The visualizations produced by t-SNE are significantly better than those produced by the other techniques on almost all of the datasets.

[1]  H. Hotelling.  Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. , 1933 .

[2]  W. Arnoldi.  The principle of minimized iterations in the solution of the matrix eigenvalue problem , 1951 .

[3]  W. Torgerson.  Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method , 1952 .

[4]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Multivariate Analysis , 1958, Nature.

[5]  John W. Sammon,et al.  A Nonlinear Mapping for Data Structure Analysis , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[6]  Herman Chernoff,et al.  The Use of Faces to Represent Points in k- Dimensional Space Graphically , 1973 .

[7]  Peter G. Doyle,et al.  Random Walks and Electric Networks: REFERENCES , 1987 .

[8]  Robert A. Jacobs,et al.  Increased rates of convergence through learning rate adaptation , 1987, Neural Networks.

[9]  Olvi L. Mangasarian,et al.  Nuclear feature extraction for breast tumor diagnosis , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[10]  Sameer A. Nene,et al.  Columbia Object Image Library (COIL100) , 1996 .

[11]  Jeanny Hérault,et al.  Curvilinear component analysis: a self-organizing neural network for nonlinear mapping of data sets , 1997, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[12]  Gerard L. G. Sleijpen,et al.  Jacobi-Davidson Style QR and QZ Algorithms for the Reduction of Matrix Pencils , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[13]  Daniel A. Keim,et al.  Designing Pixel-Oriented Visualization Techniques: Theory and Applications , 2000, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[14]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. , 2000, Science.

[15]  S T Roweis,et al.  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. , 2000, Science.

[16]  Amaury Lendasse,et al.  A robust nonlinear projection method , 2000 .

[17]  Tommi S. Jaakkola,et al.  Partially labeled classification with Markov random walks , 2001, NIPS.

[18]  Mikhail Belkin,et al.  Laplacian Eigenmaps and Spectral Techniques for Embedding and Clustering , 2001, NIPS.

[19]  Gordon F. Royle,et al.  Algebraic Graph Theory , 2001, Graduate texts in mathematics.

[20]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Stochastic Neighbor Embedding , 2002, NIPS.

[21]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  Global Versus Local Methods in Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction , 2002, NIPS.

[22]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Combining active learning and semi-supervised learning using Gaussian fields and harmonic functions , 2003, ICML 2003.

[23]  Haim Levkowitz,et al.  From Visual Data Exploration to Visual Data Mining: A Survey , 2003, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[24]  Kilian Q. Weinberger,et al.  Learning a kernel matrix for nonlinear dimensionality reduction , 2004, ICML.

[25]  Christopher K. I. Williams.  On a Connection between Kernel PCA and Metric Multidimensional Scaling , 2004, Machine Learning.

[26]  Michel Verleysen,et al.  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction of data manifolds with essential loops , 2005, Neurocomputing.

[27]  B. Nadler,et al.  Diffusion maps, spectral clustering and reaction coordinates of dynamical systems , 2005, math/0503445.

[28]  Ann B. Lee,et al.  Diffusion maps and coarse-graining: a unified framework for dimensionality reduction, graph partitioning, and data set parameterization , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[29]  Kilian Q. Weinberger,et al.  Graph Laplacian Regularization for Large-Scale Semidefinite Programming , 2006, NIPS.

[30]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Reducing the Dimensionality of Data with Neural Networks , 2006, Science.

[31]  Leo Grady,et al.  Random Walks for Image Segmentation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[32]  Charles K. Chui,et al.  Special issue on diffusion maps and wavelets , 2006 .

[33]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Visualizing Similarity Data with a Mixture of Maps , 2007, AISTATS.

[34]  Lawrence Sirovich,et al.  On the Dimensionality of Face Space , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[35]  Michel Verleysen,et al.  Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction , 2021, Computer Vision.

[36]  Yoshua. Bengio,et al.  Learning Deep Architectures for AI , 2007, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[37]  Le Song,et al.  Colored Maximum Variance Unfolding , 2007, NIPS.

[38]  Eric O. Postma,et al.  Dimensionality Reduction: A Comparative Review , 2008 .