Quantitative investigation of the edge enhancement in in-line phase contrast projections and tomosynthesis provided by distributing microbubbles on the interface between two tissues: a phantom study

The objective of this study was to quantitatively investigate the ability to distribute microbubbles along the interface between two tissues, in an effort to improve the edge and/or boundary features in phase contrast imaging. The experiments were conducted by employing a custom designed tissue simulating phantom, which also simulated a clinical condition where the ligand-targeted microbubbles are self-aggregated on the endothelium of blood vessels surrounding malignant cells. Four different concentrations of microbubble suspensions were injected into the phantom: 0%, 0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.4%. A time delay of 5 min was implemented before image acquisition to allow the microbubbles to become distributed at the interface between the acrylic and the cavity simulating a blood vessel segment. For comparison purposes, images were acquired using three system configurations for both projection and tomosynthesis imaging with a fixed radiation dose delivery: conventional low-energy contact mode, low-energy in-line phase contrast and high-energy in-line phase contrast. The resultant images illustrate the edge feature enhancements in the in-line phase contrast imaging mode when the microbubble concentration is extremely low. The quantitative edge-enhancement-to-noise ratio calculations not only agree with the direct image observations, but also indicate that the edge feature enhancement can be improved by increasing the microbubble concentration. In addition, high-energy in-line phase contrast imaging provided better performance in detecting low-concentration microbubble distributions.

[1]  F. Pfeiffer,et al.  Speckle-based x-ray phase-contrast and dark-field imaging with a laboratory source. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[2]  Xizeng Wu,et al.  A general theoretical formalism for X-ray phase contrast imaging. , 2003, Journal of X-ray science and technology.

[3]  Srinivasan Vedantham,et al.  Flat-panel digital mammography system: contrast-detail comparison between screen-film radiographs and hard-copy images. , 2002, Radiology.

[4]  Di Wu,et al.  Quantitative imaging of the microbubble concentrations by using an in-line phase contrast tomosynthesis prototype: a preliminary phantom study , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[5]  Aimin Yan,et al.  Dose and detectability improvements with high energy phase sensitive x-ray imaging in comparison to low energy conventional imaging , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Hong Liu,et al.  An experimental method of determining relative phase-contrast factor for x-ray imaging systems. , 2004, Medical physics.

[7]  David R Pickens,et al.  Quantification of the effect of system and object parameters on edge enhancement in phase-contrast radiography. , 2003, Medical physics.

[8]  Di Wu,et al.  DQE characterization of a high-energy in-line phase contrast prototype under different kVp and beam filtration , 2015, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[9]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2017 , 2017, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[10]  F. Pfeiffer,et al.  Microbubbles as a scattering contrast agent for grating-based x-ray dark-field imaging , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Emilio Quaia,et al.  Mammography with synchrotron radiation: first clinical experience with phase-detection technique. , 2011, Radiology.

[12]  Franz Pfeiffer,et al.  Quantitative wave-optical numerical analysis of the dark-field signal in grating-based X-ray interferometry , 2012 .

[13]  Thomas Frauenfelder,et al.  Quantitative imaging. , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[14]  John Rong,et al.  DQE measurements in magnification X-ray imaging , 2006 .

[15]  P. Cloetens,et al.  Quantitative comparison between two phase contrast techniques: diffraction enhanced imaging and phase propagation imaging , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Yi Yang,et al.  X-ray differential phase contrast and dark-field computed tomography and radiography with microbubbles as contrast agent , 2013, 2013 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.

[17]  M. Oldham,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis with an on-board kilovoltage imaging device. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  T. P. Millard,et al.  Evaluation of microbubble contrast agents for dynamic imaging with x-ray phase contrast , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[19]  R. Edward Hendrick,et al.  Mammography quality control manual , 1999 .

[20]  Honglan Xie,et al.  Microbubble-based synchrotron radiation phase contrast imaging: basic study and angiography applications , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Di Wu,et al.  Using Microbubble as Contrast Agent for High-Energy X-Ray In-line Phase Contrast Imaging: Demonstration and Comparison Study , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  Zhong Zhong,et al.  Measurement of image contrast using diffraction enhanced imaging. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Atsushi Momose,et al.  Cadaveric and in vivo human joint imaging based on differential phase contrast by X-ray Talbot-Lau interferometry. , 2013, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[24]  Shengjiang Chang,et al.  Compensating the intensity fall-off effect in cone-beam tomography by an empirical weight formula. , 2008, Applied optics.

[25]  B. Kaufmann,et al.  Ultrasound Imaging for Risk Assessment in Atherosclerosis , 2015, International journal of molecular sciences.

[26]  J. Lindner Molecular imaging of vascular phenotype in cardiovascular disease: new diagnostic opportunities on the horizon. , 2010, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[27]  P Suortti,et al.  Medical applications of synchrotron radiation. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  P. Low,et al.  Principles in the design of ligand-targeted cancer therapeutics and imaging agents , 2015, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[29]  Bin Zheng,et al.  Characterization of a high-energy in-line phase contrast tomosynthesis prototype. , 2015, Medical physics.

[30]  Hong Liu,et al.  Clinical implementation of x-ray phase-contrast imaging: theoretical foundations and design considerations. , 2003, Medical physics.

[31]  T. P. Millard,et al.  Quantification of microbubble concentration through x-ray phase contrast imaging , 2013 .

[32]  G. Barnes,et al.  Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography. , 1994, Radiology.

[33]  G. Barnes,et al.  Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography. , 1991, Radiology.

[34]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .

[35]  R. Menk,et al.  Microbubbles as x-ray scattering contrast agents using analyzer-based imaging , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  Anne Rougee,et al.  Geometrical calibration for 3D x-ray imaging , 1993, Medical Imaging.

[37]  Hong Liu,et al.  X- Ray Diagnostic Techniques , 2003 .

[38]  Jun Zhao,et al.  Microbubbles as contrast agent for in-line x-ray phase-contrast imaging , 2011 .