The Open Ontology Repository Initiative : Requirements and Research Challenges

Very large data sets are increasingly common both in science and industry. However, incorporating multiple data types from multiple sources to solve major problems is a significant interoperability challenge. Furthermore, documents and other artifacts created in the past can be as important as recently created data sets, but interoperability with such legacy data can also be difficult. The problem with such data sets is not only the differences in recording media and formats but also the enormous changes in terminology over time. Data sets run the risk of rapid obsolescence as the meaning and formats of the data fields are forgotten or no longer available. Semantic technologies based on logic, databases and the Semantic Web can address the problem of meaningful access to and integration of data both today and over decades and centuries. This paper discusses an initiative to develop and deploy a new federated interoperability infrastructure called the Open Ontology Repository (OOR). The OOR is intended to enable communities to manage the full metadata management lifecycle. The OOR grew out of the Ontolog community that has existed for over 6 years and continues to grow in both size and diversity. An initial OOR server based on BioPortal has been deployed, and further development will emphasize technological solutions that build on existing ontology repositories as well as proven architectures and standards. Nevertheless, many research challenges remain to achieve the requirements that have been identified. This paper reports on the research challenges of the OOR initiative and the requirements that gave rise to them. Ultimately, it is hoped that the OOR initiative will result in the deployment of a robust, federated knowledge repository that can collectively correct for multiple points of failure and can foster collaborative stewardship of knowledge and metadata.

[1]  Leo Obrst,et al.  Ontologies for Corporate Web Applications , 2003, AI Mag..

[2]  Mary K Pulvermacher,et al.  Toward the Use of an Upper Ontology for U.S. Government and U.S. Military Domains: An Evaluation , 2004 .

[3]  Leo Obrst,et al.  The Evaluation of Ontologies: Toward Improved Semantic Interoperability , 2006 .

[4]  Leo Obrst,et al.  Applying Semantic Rules to Achieve Dynamic Service Oriented Architectures , 2006, 2006 Second International Conference on Rules and Rule Markup Languages for the Semantic Web (RuleML'06).

[5]  Leo Obrst,et al.  Ontologies and Rules for Rapid Enterprise Integration and Event Aggregation , 2007, 2007 Eleventh International IEEE EDOC Conference Workshop.

[6]  Robert Stevens,et al.  e-Science and biological pathway semantics , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[7]  Leo Obrst,et al.  Ontologies for Rapid Integration of Heterogeneous Data for Command, Control, & Intelligence , 2007, OIC.

[8]  Leo Obrst,et al.  Evolving Use of Distributed Semantics to Achieve Net-centricity , 2007, AAAI Fall Symposium: Regarding the Intelligence in Distributed Intelligent Systems.

[9]  Leo Obrst,et al.  Parallelized dynamic service orchestration , 2008 .

[10]  M A Musen,et al.  BioPortal: ontologies and data resources with the click of a mouse. , 2008, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.

[11]  Enrico Motta,et al.  DOOR - Towards a Formalization of Ontology Relations , 2009, KEOD.

[12]  E. Berger,et al.  Ensuring the integrity, accessibility, and stewardship of research data in the digital age , 2009 .

[13]  Mathieu d'Aquin,et al.  Sharing and reusing aligned ontologies with cupboard , 2009, K-CAP '09.

[14]  Mathieu d'Aquin,et al.  Cupboard - A Place to Expose Your Ontologies to Applications and the Community , 2009, ESWC.

[15]  Leo Obrst,et al.  A net-centric metadata framework for service-oriented environments , 2009, Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontologies.

[16]  Leo Obrst,et al.  Dynamic Web Service Assembly Using OWL and a Theorem Prover , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing.