Crossing boundaries: complex systems, transdisciplinarity and applied impact agendas

This paper highlights the challenges of distilling generalizable principles and guidelines for sustainable co-management arrangements and demonstrating the practical impact of the underlying research. We explore the complexities of multi-country, socio-ecological research and address the challenges of moving beyond pure research to engage with the science-policy-practice interfaces. Growing demand for such applied research by official funding agencies is linked to the requirements of policy relevance and ‘research impact’. Successful applied research requires ongoing user engagement throughout a project, which is often hard to achieve, especially when diverse stakeholders have sharply different power, knowledge and interests. The arguments are exemplified by our personal experience on such a complex project. Clear impact agendas could be useful for strengthening efforts to achieve transdisciplinarity but research applications should not be penalised on account of inherent potential uncertainties and risks.

[1]  Michael Watts,et al.  Liberation ecologies : environment, development, social movements , 1998 .

[2]  Tim Forsyth,et al.  Critical Political Ecology , 2003 .

[3]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources , 1994 .

[4]  S. Jentoft.  In the Power of Power: The Understated Aspect of Fisheries and Coastal Management , 2007 .

[5]  B. Jones.  Bounded Rationality and Political Science: Lessons from Public Administration and Public Policy , 2003 .

[6]  D. Lang,et al.  A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science , 2013 .

[7]  John Fitzgibbon,et al.  Co-management of Natural Resources: A Proposed Framework , 2004, Environmental management.

[8]  D. Simon,et al.  The peri-urban interface: approaches to sustainable natural and human resource use , 2006 .

[9]  P. Blaikie.  A review of political ecology:Issues, epistemology and analytical narratives , 1999 .

[10]  R. Pomeroy,et al.  Conditions affecting the success of fisheries co-management: lessons from Asia , 2001 .

[11]  D. Simon,et al.  Poverty elimination, North-South research collaboration, and the politics of participatory development , 2003 .

[12]  Michael Watts,et al.  Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements , 1997 .

[13]  C. Folke,et al.  Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change: Fikret Berkes, Johan Colding and Carl Folke (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, 2003. xxi + 393 pages. ISBN 0-521-81592-4 (hardback), £65 , 2004 .

[14]  Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on New Methods for Adaptive Water Management Managing Change toward Adaptive Water Management through Social Learning , 2007 .

[15]  Matthias Bergmann,et al.  Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization , 2012 .

[16]  Fikret Berkes,et al.  Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[17]  O. Sahin,et al.  Improving cross-sectoral climate change adaptation for coastal settlements: insights from South East Queensland, Australia , 2014, Regional Environmental Change.

[18]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Water security for a planet under pressure: interconnected challenges of a changing world call for sustainable solutions , 2012 .

[19]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  The role of science in decision making: does evidence‐based science drive environmental policy? , 2010 .

[20]  John H. Lawton,et al.  Ecology, politics and policy , 2007 .

[21]  Bruce V. Taylor,et al.  Bringing it all together: researcher dialogue to improve synthesis in regional climate adaptation in South-East Queensland, Australia , 2014, Regional Environmental Change.

[22]  T. Forsyth.  Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science , 2002 .

[23]  F. Wickson,et al.  Transdisciplinary research: characteristics, quandaries and quality , 2006 .

[24]  Pim Martens,et al.  Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[25]  G. Cumming,et al.  Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: Causes, consequences, and solutions , 2006 .

[26]  C. Macleod,et al.  Mechanisms to improve integrative research at the science-policy interface for sustainable catchment management , 2008 .

[27]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: Toward a knowledge-action-system in global environmental change research , 2010 .

[28]  E. Ostrom.  A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems , 2009, Science.

[29]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Cool Heads for a Hot World – Social Sciences Under a Changing Sky , 2012 .

[30]  W. Lucht,et al.  Climate change adaptation and sustainable regional development: a case study for the Federal State of Brandenburg, Germany , 2012, Regional Environmental Change.

[31]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The globalization of socio-ecological systems: An agenda for scientific research , 2006 .

[32]  W. Neil Adger,et al.  ADVANCING A POLITICAL ECOLOGY OF GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL DISCOURSES , 2001 .

[33]  T. A. Benjaminsen,et al.  THE KILOSA KILLINGS: POLITICAL ECOLOGY OF A FARMER–HERDER CONFLICT IN TANZANIA , 2009 .