Systematic scaling of target width: dynamics, planning, and feedback

The target width of a single target in a two-target reciprocal aiming task was scaled from small (ID = 5.85) to large (ID = 2.85) and large-to-small within individual trials with movement amplitude fixed. Scaling target width produced a transition in the end-effector's dynamics and based on a measure of movement harmonicity, the transition was sensitive to the initial conditions but not to the direction of target width scaling. Hysteresis emerged in a variety of kinematic measures suggesting that the interdependency of planning and feedback control processes was sensitive to initial conditions as well as the direction of target width scaling. Practice increased the efficiency of the reciprocal movements and produced changes in movement time and the measure of harmonic motion that revealed a tuning of the end-effector's dynamics to cyclical motion over as large of range of IDs as possible. The tuning occurred through the modulation of time spent accelerating and decelerating the end-effector for IDs outside the range of 3.85-4.26. The results are discussed with reference to a critical ID boundary that separates regions of parameter space wherein the end-effector's dynamics are more cyclical (limit-cycle) or discrete (fixed-point) in nature.

[1]  Denis Mottet,et al.  The dynamics of goal-directed rhythmical aiming , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[2]  Young U. Ryu,et al.  Discrete and cyclical units of action in a mixed target pair aiming task , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  James L. Lyons,et al.  Optimal Control Strategies Under Different Feedback Schedules: Kinematic Evidence , 2002, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  C. Winstein,et al.  Practice effects on the less-affected upper extremity after stroke. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  Yves Guiard,et al.  Fitts' law in the discrete vs. cyclical paradigm , 1997 .

[6]  G. Schöner,et al.  A dynamic theory of coordination of discrete movement , 1990, Biological Cybernetics.

[7]  Denis Mottet,et al.  Informational constraints in human precision aiming , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[8]  R Plamondon,et al.  Speed/accuracy trade-offs in target-directed movements , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[9]  R A Abrams,et al.  Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. , 1988, Psychological review.

[10]  Romeo Chua,et al.  On-line control of rapid aiming movements: Unexpected target perturbations and movement kinematics. , 1998 .

[11]  Yves Guiard,et al.  Two-handed performance of a rhythmical fitts task by individuals and dyads. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  E. R. Crossman,et al.  Feedback Control of Hand-Movement and Fitts' Law , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  Y. Guiard On Fitts's and Hooke's laws: simple harmonic movement in upper-limb cyclical aiming. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[15]  J. Cullen,et al.  The utilization of visual information in the control of reciprocal aiming movements. , 2001, Human Movement Science.

[16]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Rhythmic and discrete elements in multi-joint coordination , 2003, Brain Research.